Effect of supplementing selenized yeast on performance and anti-oxidant responses in Vanaraja and commercial broiler chickens
 

DOI: 10.18805/ijar.B-3520    | Article Id: B-3520 | Page : 500-504
Citation :- Effect of supplementing selenized yeast on performance and anti-oxidant responses in Vanaraja and commercial broiler chickens.Indian Journal Of Animal Research.2019.(53):500-504
B. Prakash, S.V. Rama Rao, M.V.L.N. Raju and C. Sreenivasa Reddy drbhukyaprakash@gmail.com
Address : ICAR - Directorate of Poultry Research Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, Telangana, India.
Submitted Date : 30-10-2017
Accepted Date : 12-05-2018

Abstract

The study was conducted to determine the efficacy of organic Se produced through Saccharomyces cerevisiae from sodium selenite in the diet of Vanaraja and commercial broiler chicken. The trial was conducted in day-old Vanaraja chicks (n=160), which were randomly distributed into 4 dietary groups having 5 chicks in each of 8 replicates. The basal diet (BD) was formulated and supplemented with calculated quantity of organic Se to formulate the different experimental diets and fed up to 5 weeks. The second experiment in day-old commercial broiler chicks (n=350), which were randomly distributed into 7 dietary groups having 5 chicks in each of 10 replicates.  The experimental birds were fed BD (diet I) with 0.2 mg/kg organic Se (diet II), 0.4 mg/kg organic Se (diet III) and 0.6 mg/kg organic Se (diet IV), and BD with 0.2 mg/kg inorganic Se (diet V), 0.4 mg/kg inorganic Se (diet VI) and 0.6 mg/kg inorganic Se (diet VII) up to 6 weeks.  The body weight gain during 5th week was higher (P<0.05) in the birds fed with diet supplemented 0.3 mg/kg of the organic Se compared to the other groups. However, feed intake and feed conversion ratio (FCR) among different groups did not vary (P>0.05) throughout the experiment. The activity of glutathione peroxidase was higher (P<0.01) among the groups fed the diets containing organic Se (0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 mg/kg) compared to the control diet in experiment I. In experiment II, body weight gain and FCR at the end of the experiment were improved significantly (P<0.01) in the group fed 0.2 mg/kg organic Se compared to control. Alanine transaminase, Aspartate aminotransferase, triglycerides and cholesterol levels were lower in groups fed diets supplemented organic Se compared to control or inorganic Se fed groups. Whereas, glutathione reductase activity was significantly higher among the groups supplemented organic Se compared to other dietary groups. Based on the results it can be concluded that supplementing organic Se up to 0.3 mg/kg enhanced the body weight gain and anti-oxidant enzyme activity in Vanaraja and commercial broiler chicken.  

Keywords

Blood biochemical Chickens Organic selenium Performance Yeast.

References

  1. Cohen, G., Dembiec, D. and Marcus, J. (1970). Measurement of catalase in tissue extract. Anal. Biochem., 34: 30-38.
  2. Guido, I., Alessandro, A., Mariella, F., Raffaella, R., Andrea, F., Antonella, B., Vittorio D.O. and Giovanni, S. (2013). Effects of inclusion of Selenium-Enriched Yeast in the diet of laying hens on Performance, Eggshell Quality, and Selenium Tissue Deposition. Italian J. Anim. Sci., 12:1, e1, DOI: 10.4081/ijas.2013.e1. 
  3. Hada, F.H., Malheiros, R.D., Silva , J.D.T., Marques, R.H., Gravena, R.A., Silva, V.K. and Moraes, V.M.B. (2013). Effect of protein, carbohydrate, lipid, and selenium levels on the performance, carcass yield, and blood cchanges in broilers. Brazilian J. Poult. Sci., 15 (4): 385-39.
  4. Hoffmann, P. R. (2007). Mechanisms by which selenium influences immune responses. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp., 55:289-297.
  5. Kang, B., Bansal, M. and Mehta, U. (2000). Hyperlipidemia and type I 52 monodeiodinase activity: regulation by selenium supple    mentation in rabbits. Bio. Trace Elem. Res., 7:231- 239.
  6. Oliveira, T.F.B., Rivera, D.F.R., Mesquita, F.R., Braga, H. and Ramos, E. M. (2014). Effect of different sources and levels of selenium on performance, meat quality, and tissue characteristics of broilers, J. Appl. Poult. Res., 23: 15–22
  7. Paglia, D.E. and Valantine, W.N. (1967). Studies on quantitative characterization of erythrocytes glutathione peroxidise, J. Laboratory and Clinical., 79: 158-169. 
  8. Peric, L., Miloševic, N., Žikic, D., Kanaèki, Z., Džinic , N., Nollet L. and Spring, P. (2009). Effect of selenium sources on performance and meat characteristics of broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 18: 403-409.
  9. Rama Rao, S.V., Bhukya Prakash, Kumari, K., Raju, M.V. L.N., Panda, A. K., Poonam, S. and Murthy, O.K. (2013). Effect of supplementing organic selenium on performance, carcass traits, oxidative parameters and lmmune responses in commercial broiler chickens. Asian-Aus. J Anim. Sci., 26: 247-252.
  10. Rama Rao, S.V., Prakash, B., Raju M.V.L.N. and Pradeep Reddy, E. (2016). Effect of supplementing organic forms of zinc, selenium and chromium on performance, anti-Oxidant and lmmune responses in broiler chicken reared in tropical summer. Bio. Trace Elem. Res., 172 (2): 511–520.
  11. Sonja, D., Izeta, O., Nikola, S. and Bozidar, M. (2016). Effect of organic selenium in broiler diet on slaughter traits and plasma lipids. J Agr. Vet. Sci., 9(5): 71-73.
  12. Swennen, Q., Decuypere, E. and Buyse, J. (2007). Implications of dietary macronutrients for growth and metabolism in broiler chickens. World Poult. Sci. Journal., 63(4): 541-55.
  13. Toghyani, M., Khodami, A. and Gheisari, A.A. (2008). Effect of organic chromium supplementation on meat quality of heat stressed broiler chicken. Am. J. Anim. Sci., 3:62-67.
  14. Underwood, E.J. and Suttle, N.F. (2001). The mineral nutrition of livestock, 3rd edn. CAB Int, London, UK.
  15. Waseem, M.Z., Anjum, K., Saima, N. and Jibran, H. (2016). Organic and inorganic selenium in poultry: A review. Ind. J Anim. Res., 10.18805/ijar.v0iOF.6837.
  16. Wu, R., Zhan, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, M. and Yuan, D. (2011). Effect of different selenomethionine forms and levels on performance of breeder hens and Se distribution of tissue and egg inclusion. Bio. Trace Elem. Res., 143: 923-931. 

Global Footprints