Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.5 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 52 issue 9 (september 2018) : 1373-1377

Socio-economic factors and management practices followed in eastern Uttar Pradesh for rearing of Jaunpuri goat

Dharmendra kumar, V. K. Singh, Alok Kumar Yadav, Amit Kumar Jha, Jitendra Singh
1<p>Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Veterinary Sciences andAnimal Husbandry,<br /> Narendra Dev University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad-224 229, Uttar Pradesh, India.</p>
Cite article:- kumar Dharmendra, Singh K. V., Yadav Kumar Alok, Jha Kumar Amit, Singh Jitendra (2017). Socio-economic factors and management practices followed in eastern Uttar Pradesh for rearing of Jaunpuri goat . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 52(9): 1373-1377. doi: 10.18805/ijar.v0iOF.8465.

The present investigation was undertaken to study the management practices and socio-economic factors affecting the farming of Jaunpuri goat in two districts of its native tracts in eastern Uttar Pradesh. viz., Allahabad and Jaunpur. Ten villages from Jaunpur and fifteen villages from Allahabad district were randomly selected for the present investigation. The findings revealed that most of the goat farmers in Jaunpur and Allahabad district were of marginal type in their land holding capacity with 47.61 and 68.18% respectively and they earned more than Rs.5000 per annum from goatery.  Besides the goatery, the other professions of goat rearers are 60% farming, 33.33% labor, 6.67% small business in Jaunpur and 58.82% labour, 41.18% farming in Allahabad district. The literacy of the head of the Jaunpuri goat rearing family was 66.67 and 68.18 % respectively in the Jaunpur and Allahabad district and most of farmers have 6-8 members per family. The farmers of both districts used to house their goats mostly during night time. The result indicated that 70.48 and 80.91% farmers from Jaunpur and Allahabad districts keep their animal in the house during night. However, 29.52 and 19.09% of the farmers used to keep their animals in the goat shed both day and night. The overall percentages of close and open type house were 27.91 and 72.09%, respectively in Jaunpur and Allahabad district. Most goat sheds were Kuccha type, because of the poor economic status of goat farmer in these districts. The Jaunpuri goat is dual type of goat which produces milk and meat both. Thus the present findings indicated that in both the districts the farmers reared this breed for dual purpose.

  1. GOI. (2006). Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics (AHS-10). Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India.

  2. Kumar, S., Vaid, R. K. and Sagar, R. L. (2006). Contribution of goat to livelihood security of small ruminant’s farmers in semi-    aridregion. Indian J Small Rumin, 12: 61-66.

  3. Maity, S. B. and Das, M. M. (2000). Goat farming a profitable enterprise at Bundelkhand region. Indian Farming, Nov 28-29.

  4. Mishra P., Ali, S. A. and Verma, N. K. (2015). On the population and characteristics of descript and non-descript goats of India. Biosci. Biotech. Res. Comm., 8(2): 213-216.

  5. Patra, A. K., Sharma, K., Dutta, N. A. K., Pattanaik, A. K. (2002). Effect of partial replacement of dietary protein by a leaf meal mixture containing Leucaena leucocephala, Morus alba and Azadirachta indica on performance of goats. Asian-Aus J Anim Sci., 15(12):1732-1737

  6. Prasad, R., Singh, A.K., Singh, L. and Singh, A. (2013). Economics of Goat Farming Under Traditional Low Input Production System in Uttar Pradesh. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 13 (2): 62-66.

  7. Rout, P.K., Saxena, V.K., Khan. B.U., Roy. R., Mandal, A., Singh, S.K. and Singh, L.B. (2000). Characterization of Jamanapari goats in its home tract. Genetic and Breeding Division, CIRG, Makhdoom, (Mathura) U.P. 

  8. Safeer Alam (2002). Breed characterization and evaluation of Beetal goats, Ph.D. thesis, Central institute for research on goat, Makhdoom, Mathura, U.P.

  9. Sen, A. R., Santra, A. and Karim, S. A. (2004). Carcass yield, composition and meat quality attributes of sheep and goat under semi arid conditions. Meat Science, 66: 757-63.

  10. Singh, K. P., Dixit, S. P., Singh, P. K., Taneja, K. R., Singh, G. and Ahlawat, S. P. S. (2009). Economics of goat farming undertraditional low input production system in North Gujarat of India. Indian J Anim Sci., 79 (9): 948-51.

  11. Singh, M. K., Rai, B., Kumar, A., Simaria, M. B. and Singh, N. P. (2009). Performance of Zalawadi Goats under Range Conditions. Indian J Anim Sci., 79 (1): 68–72.

  12. Singh, S. K. (2004). Security system for goat germ plasm in India. Proceeding of Seminar on Goat Genome. CIRG, Mathura. 87

  13. Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. (1995). Statistical Methods (7th edn) lowa State university Press Ames, Iowa, USA


Editorial Board

View all (0)