Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 52 issue 9 (september 2018) : 1263-1266

Prediction of body weight from linear body measurements in sheep

Sandeep Kumar, S.P. Dahiya, Z.S. Malik, C.S. Patil
1Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar-125 004, Haryana, India
Cite article:- Kumar Sandeep, Dahiya S.P., Malik Z.S., Patil C.S. (2017). Prediction of body weight from linear body measurements in sheep. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 52(9): 1263-1266. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3360.

ABSTRACT

Measurements of body conformation in sheep are of value in judging the quantitative characteristics of meat and also helpful in developing suitable selection criterion. Data  on 349 Harnali sheep for body length (BL), body height (BH), heart girth (HG), paunch girth (PG), tail length (TL), head circumference (HC), ear length (EL), ear width (EW), face length (FL) and adult body weight (ABW) were analysed to study the relationship between linear body measurements and  body weight. The mixed linear model with dam’s weight at lambing as covariate was used to study the effect of non-genetic factors on body measurements and body weight. High estimates of heritability were obtained for BL, BH, HG, TL, HC, EL, EW, FL and ABW while moderate estimate was obtained for PG. The phenotypic correlations of BL, BH, HG, PG, HC and FL with ABW were positive and significant (0.32±0.04 to 0.59±0.08). The genetic correlations of HG, PG, HC and FL with ABW were 0.51±0.13, 0.42±0.19, 0.44±0.13 and 0.43±0.15, respectively. Various combinations of linear type traits to predict ABW were found to have coefficient of determination as high as 0.92. It is concluded that heart girth is the most important trait for estimation of live weight in sheep and the prediction equation is Body weight = -63.72 + 1.23 HG with R2 = 0.87.

REFERENCES

  1. Abbasi, M.A. and Ghafouri-Kesbi, F. (2011). Genetic co (variance) components for body weight and body measurements in Makuie sheep. Asian–Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 24: 739–743.
  2. Arora, D.N., Singh, B., Kalra, S. and Balaine, D.S. (1986). Studies on growth and body weights in different breeds. Livestock Adviser. 11(11): 29-31. (S)
  3. Atta, M. and El Khidir, O.A. (2004). Use of heart girth, wither height and scapuloischial length for prediction of liveweight of Nilotic sheep. Small Rumin. Res, 55: 233-237.
  4. Attah, S., Okubanjo, A.O., Omojola, A.B. and Adesehinwa, A.O.K. (2004). Body and carcass linear measurements of goats slaughtered at different weights. Livest. Res. Rural dev. 16: 160-172.
  5. Bakhshalizadeh, S.,Hashemi, A., Gaffari, M., Jafari, S. and Farhadian, H. (2015). Estimation of genetic parameters and genetic trends for biometric traits in Moghani sheep breed. Small Ruminant Research. 134: 79–83
  6. Birteeb, P.T., Peters, S.O., Yakubu, A., Adeleke, M.A. and Ozoje, M.O. (2012). Multivariate characterisation of the phenotypic traits of Djallonke and Sahel sheep in Northern Ghana. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 45: 267-274.
  7. Borg, R.C., Notter, D.R. and Kott, R.W. (2009). Phenotypic and genetic associations between lamb growth traits and adult ewe body weights in western range sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 87:3506-3514.
  8. Cam, M.A., Olfaz, M. and Soydan, E. (2010). Body measurements reflect body weights and carcass yields in Karayaka sheep. Asian Journal Animal and Veterinary Advances. 5: 120-127.
  9. Çilek, S. and Gotoh, T. (2014). Effects of dam age lamb gender, and singleton or twin status on body size of Malya Lambs in Middle Anatolia, Turkey. J. Fac. Agr., Kyushu Univ. 59(2): 313–320.
  10. Draper, N.R. and Smith, H. (1998). Applied Regression Analysis. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA.
  11. Fadare, A. O., Peters, S. O., Adedeji, T. A. and Ozoje, M. O. (2014). Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates of body morphometric traits of West African dwarf lambs in a humid tropical environment. Tropical Agriculture. 91 ( 3) :165.
  12. Goe, M.R., Alldredge , J.R. and Light, D. (2001). Use of heart girth to predict body weight of working oxen in the Ethiopian highlands. Levest. Prod. Sci. 69: 187-195.
  13. Harvey, W. R. (1990). Mixed model least squares and maximum likehood computer program, Columus, O.H. pp.1-21.
  14. Islam, M. R., Saadullah, A. R., Howlider, M.A.R. and Huq, M. A. (1991). Estimation of live weight and dressed carcass weight from different body measurements in goats. J. Anim. Sci. 61(4): 460-461.
  15. Iyiola-Tunji, A.O., Olugbemi, T.S., Ali, A.O. and Ojo, O.A. (2011). Inter-relationship between body measurements and price of sheep in an open market in Kano State. Animal Production. 13(1): 64-68.
  16. Jafari, S. and Hashemi, A. (2014). Estimation of genetic parameters for body measurements and their association with yearling liveweight in the Makuie sheep breed. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 44 (2): 141–147.
  17. Lalit, Malik, Z.S., Dalal, D.S., Patil, C.S. and Dahiya, S.P. (2016). Genetic studies on growth, reproduction and wool production traits of Harnali sheep. Indian J. Anim. Res. online published. DO1:10.18805/ijar. 10984.
  18. Mandal, A., Dass, G., Rout, P.K. and Roy, R.( 2010). Genetic parameters for direct and maternal effects on post-weaning body measurements of Muzaffarnagari sheep in India. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 10: 9752–9756.
  19. Musa, A.M., Idam, N.Z. and Elamin, K.M. ( 2012). Regression analysis of linear body measurements on live weight in Sudanese Shugor Sheep. Online J. Anim. Feed Res. 2(1): 27-29.
  20. Panda, P., Rao, P.K., Kumar, P. and Bhujabal, B.N. (2014). Characterization of mutton type indigenous sheep of Puri district in Odisha. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants. 20 (1): 95-97.
  21. Petrovic, M.P., Petrovic, V.C., Muslic, R.D., Iliæ, Z., Spasiæ, Z., Stojkoviæ, J. and Makshimovic, N. (2012). Genetic and phenotypic of the body measured traits in Merinolandschaf breed of sheep. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry. 28 (4): 733-741.
  22. Ravimurugan, T., Thiruvenkadan, A.K., Sudhakar, K., Panneerselvam, S. and Elango, A. (2013). The estimation of body weight from body measurements in Kilakarsal Sheep of Tamil Nadu India. Iranian J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 3(2): 357-360.
  23. Riva, J., Rizzi, R., Marelli, S. and Cavalchini, G. (2002) Body measurements in Bergamasca Sheep, Small Ruminant Research, 221-227.
  24. Sharaby, M. A. and Sulleiman, I.O. (1987). Factors influencing meat production traits and their association with body weight dimensions. Word Review. Anim. Prod., 23(4): 86-88.
  25. Snyman, M.A. ( 2012). Genetic analysis of body weight in South African Angora kids and young goats. South African Journal of Animal Science. 42 (2): 146-155.
  26. Sowande, O.S. and Sobola, O.S. (2008). Body measurements of West African dwarf sheep as parameters for estimation of live weight. Trop. Anim. Hlth. Prod. 40(6): 433-9.
  27. Tadesse, A. and Gebremariam, T. (2010). Application of linear body measurements for live body weight estimation of Highland Sheep in Tigray Region, North-Ethiopia. J. The Dry lands. 3(2):203-207
  28. Thiruvenkadan, A.K. (2005). Determination of best-fitted regression model for estimation of body weight in Kanni Adu kids under farmer’s management system. Livest. Res. Rural Dev, 17: 160-165.
  29. Verma, S.K., Dahiya, S.P., Malik, Z.S., Patil, C.S. and Patil, H.R. (2016). Biometrical characterization of Harnali sheep : A new synthetic strain. Indian J. Vet. Res. 25(1) : 16-21.
  30. Waheed, A., Khan, M.S., Ali, S. and Sarwar, M. ( 2011). Estimation of growth curve parameters in Beetal goats. Arch. Tierzucht. 54:287-296. 
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)