Morphological and morphometrical studies on the carpal bone of blue bull  (boselephus tragocamelus)

DOI: 10.18805/ijar.B-3332    | Article Id: B-3332 | Page : 632-636
Citation :- Morphological and morphometrical studies on the carpal bone of blue bull (boselephus tragocamelus).Indian Journal of Animal Research.2018.(52):632-636
Sanjay Kumar Bharti and Ishwer Singh drskbharti24@gmail.com
Address : Department of Veterinary Anatomy, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar-263 145, U.S. Nagar, Uttarakhand, India.
Submitted Date : 27-10-2016
Accepted Date : 11-04-2017


The present study has been carried out on the carpal bones of six blue bull. The carpal bones consisted of six short bones arranged in two transverse rows one above the other. The bones of the proximal row from medial to lateral were radial carpal or scaphoid, intermediate carpal or semilunar, ulnar carpal or cuneiform and accessory carpal or pisiform. The bones of the distal row were second and third fused carpal or os magnum and fourth carpal or unciform. The radial carpal bone was the medial-most of the proximal row and presented six surfaces. The intermediate carpal bone was wedge shaped, being wide in front and constricted in middle. The ulnar carpal bone was irregular in outline and situated lateral to the intermediate carpal. The accessory carpal was a short, medially curved bone. It was placed behind the ulnar carpal. In the distal row, the fused second and third carpal bone was situated medially and was larger than fourth carpal. The fourth carpal bone was smaller of the two bones of the distal row. It was roughly quadrilateral in outline and decreased in thickness cranio-caudally.


Biometry Blue bull Carpal.


  1. Akers, R.M. and Denbow, M. (2008). Anatomy and Physiology of Domestic Animals pp: 152-160 Lowa State University, Ames, Iowa,.
  2. Bagchi. S; Goyal. S.P.; Sankar. K. (2004). Harbivore density and biomass in a semi-arid tropical dry deciduous forest of western India. Journal of Tropical Ecology 20 (4):475-478. 
  3. Choudhary, O.P., Mathur, R., Joshi, S, Beniwal, G. and Dangi, A. (2013). Gross and Biometrical studies on carpals of chital (Axis axis). Vet. Practitioner. 14 (1): 36-39.
  4. Choudhary O.P.; ( 2015). Osteo-morpholgical studies of skull and appendicular skeleton of Indian Blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra).Ph.D. thesis submitted to G.B.P.A.T.Pantnagar, India.
  5. Frandson, R.D., Wilke, W.L. and Fails, A.D. (2009). Anatomy and Physiology of Farm Animals.. Willey-Blackwell, Ames, Iowa. pp: 71-74
  6. Getty, R. (1975). Sisson and Grossman’s. The Anatomy of the Domesticated Animals. Vol. I, 5th edn. pp. 273-296. W.B. Saunders Co. Philadelphia. 
  7. Konig, H.E. and Liebich, H.G. (2006). Veterinary Anatomy of Domestic Animals, 3rd edn.,. Schattauer, Stuttgart, Germany. pp.145-164
  8. Miller, M.E., Christensen, G.C. and Evans, H.E. (1964). Anatomy of the Dog. pp. 64-78. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia. 
  9. Özkan, Z.E. (2004). Macro-Anatomical Investigations on the Hedgehog Skeleton (Erinaceus europaeus) I- Ossa Membri Thoracici. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 28: 271-274.
  10. Raghavan, D. (1964) Anatomy of ox. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp. 97-117.
  11. Siddiqui, M.S.I., Khan, M.Z.I., Sarma, M., Islam, M.N. and Jahan, M.R. (2008). Macro-anatomy of the bones of the forelimb of Black Bengal Goat (Capra hircus): Bangladesh J. Vet. Med. 6 (1): 59-66.
  12. Smuts, M. and Bezuidenhout, A.J. (1987). Anatomy of the Dromedary. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 24-34.
  13. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (2004). Statistical Methods. 8th edn. lowa State University Press, Ames, lowa, USA. pp. 26-37.

Global Footprints