Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 52 issue 6 (june 2018) : 898-902

Comparative efficacy of homeopathic and allopathic treatments against Foot and Mouth disease in cattle

N. Chand, A. S. Sirohi, S. Tyagi, A. Sharma, Suresh Kumar, T. V. Raja
1<p>ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cattle, Meerut Cantt-250 001, Uttar Pradesh, India.</p>
Cite article:- Chand N., Sirohi S. A., Tyagi S., Sharma A., Kumar Suresh, Raja V. T. (2017). Comparative efficacy of homeopathic and allopathic treatments against Foot and Mouth disease in cattle . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 52(6): 898-902. doi: 10.18805/ijar.v0iOF.7818.

The study was conducted in crossbred Frieswal bulls (Holstein–Friesian X Sahiwal) during an outbreak of FMD and 24 FMD-affected animals were randomly divided into two groups–homeopathic treatment group and allopathic treatment group–consisting of 14 and 10 animals, respectively.  Animals in the homeopathic treatment group were treated with Sulphur 200C @ 20 drops orally once, Kalium iodatum 200C @ 20 drops orally twice a day for 3 days.  Calendula mother tincture was used for washing and topical application over the oral and foot lesions. Animals in the allopathic treatment group were treated with intramuscular injections of strepto-penicillin twice a day for 3 days, meloxicam once a day for 3 days along with washing of oral and foot lesions with potassium permanganate (1:1000) followed by topical application of 2% boroglycerine over the oral ulcers. The animals were closely inspected for 12 days for recording clinical signs. The mean rectal temperature in the animals of homeopathic treatment group was significantly (p<0.05) lower than those of the allopathic treatment group on days 2 and 3 post treatment. Appetite score improved significantly (p<0.05) in homeopathic treatment group as compared with allopathic treatment group on day 3 post treatment. Healing scores of oral mucosal lesion were significantly (p<0.05) higher in the homoeopathic treatment group than that in the allopathic treatment group on days 2, 3, and 5 post therapy. Healing of foot lesions was significantly (p<0.05) better in the homeopathic treatment group than that in the allopathic treatment group on day 3 and 5 post treatment.


  1. Alexandersen, S., Zhang, Z., Donaldson, A. I. and Garland A. J.(2003). The pathogenesis and diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease. J. Comp. Path., 129: 1-36.

  2. Boericke, W.(1991). Pocket Manual of Homeopathic Materia Medica. 9th Edition, B. Jain Publishers (P) Ltd. New Delhi, India, pp 197 & 584.

  3. Bogdnova, N.S., Nikolaeva, I.S., Scherbakova, L.I., Tolstova, T.I., Moskalenko, N.I. and Pershin, G.N. (1970). Studies of antiviral properties of Calendula officinalis. Farmakol Toksikol (Mosc), 33:349.

  4. Clarke, J.H. (1996). A Dictionary of Practical Materia Medica. Reprint Edition, Vol-2, B. Jain Publisher (P) Ltd, New Delhi, India, pp.127-140.

  5. Day, C. (1999). Veterinary homeopathy: principles and practices. In: Scheon AM, Wyne SG editors. Complementary and Alternative Veterinary Medicine. Principles and practices. St. Luis: Mushy pp 485-513.

  6. Della-Porta, A.J. (1983). Current status of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines including the use of genetic engineering. Australian Vet. J., 60: 129. 

  7. Duz, E.H., Icen, H., Arserrim, N.B., Cakmak, .F, Bakir, B. and Uysal, E. (2012). Comparison of classic, theranekron and classic plus theranekron treatment on the foot and mouth disease lesions in cattle in Van, Diyarbakir and Ankara regions in Turkey. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 11: 3258-3261.

  8. Fronza, M., Heinzman, B., Hamburger, M., Laufer, S. and Merfort, I. (2009). Determination of the wound healing effect of Calendula extracts using the scratch assay with 3T3 fibroblasts. J Ethnopharmacol, 126: 463-467.

  9. Kent, J.T. (2000). Lectures on homeopathic materia medica. Available at: http:// homeoint.org/ books3/kentmm/ sul.htm, [accessed on 12.04.2016].

  10. Longjam, N., Deb, R., Sarmah, A. K., Tayo, T., Awachat, V. B. and Saxena, V. K. (2011). A Brief review on diagnosis of foot-and-Mouth disease of livestock: conventional to molecular tools. Vet Med Int., 2011, 905768. http://doi.org/10.4061/2011/905768.

  11. Lotfollahzadeh, S., Alizadeh, M.R., Mohri, M. and Dezfouli, M.R.M. (2012). The therapeutic effect of Tarentula cubensis extract (Theranekron) in foot-and-mouth disease in cattle: a randomized trial in an endemic setting. Homeopathy. 101:159-164.

  12. Muley, B.P., Khadabadi, S.S. and Banarase, N.B. (2009). Phytochemical constituents and pharmacological activities of Calendula officinalis Linn (Asteraceae): A Review. Trop J Pharm Res., 8:455-465.

  13. Parente, L.M.L., Junior, R.D.L., Tresvenzol, L.M.F., Vinaud, M.C., Paula, J.R. and Paulo, N.M. (2012). Wound healing and anti-    inflammatory effect in animal models of Calendula officinalis L. growing in Brazil. J. Evid. Based Complementary Altern. Med. volume 2012; pp 1-7 doi: 10.1155/ 2012/ 375671.

  14. Preethi, K.C., Kuttan, G. and Kuttan, R. (2009). Anti-inflammatory activity of flower extract of C. officinalis Linn. and its possible mechanism of action. Indian J Exp Biol., 47:113-120.

  15. Radostits, O.M., Gay, C.C., Blood, D.C., Hinchcliff, K.W. and Constable, P.D. (2007). Veterinary Medicine- A textbook of the Diseases of Cattle, Horses, Sheep, Pigs and Goats. 10th Edition, WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia, USA.

  16. Rao, S.G., Udupa, A.L., Rao, G, Rao. P.G.M. and Kulkarni, D.R. (1991). Wound healing activities of Calendula and Hypericum: two homeopathic drugs promoting wound healing in rats. Fitoterapia, 62:508.

  17. Shakoor, A., Kashif, M., Nasir, A., Ehtisham-ul-Haque, S., Hussain, A., Waheed, U. and Muhammad, S. A. (2014). Comparative Clinical Efficacy of Allopathic, Homoeopathic and Herbal Treatments against Foot and Mouth Disease in Buffaloes. Pak. j. life soc. Sci., 12: 155 159.

  18. Snowden, J.M. (1981).Wound contraction. A quantitative interpretation. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci., 59: 203-217.

  19. Yang, P.C., Chu, R.M., Chung, W.B. and Sung, H.T. (1999). Epidemiological characteristics and financial costs of the 1997 foot-and-    mouth disease epidemic in Taiwan. Vet. Rec., 25: 731-734. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)