Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.5 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 52 issue 5 (may 2018) : 793-795

Gross anatomy of the skull of hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius)

K.M. Lucy, V. R. Indu, C. Leena, R. Fathima, C. George, H. S. Patki, S. Surjith, A.J. Anneth
1<p>Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Histology,&nbsp;College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, Thrissur- 680 651, Kerala, India.</p>
Cite article:- Lucy K.M., Indu R. V., Leena C., Fathima R., George C., Patki S. H., Surjith S., Anneth A.J. (2017). Gross anatomy of the skull of hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius) . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 52(5): 793-795. doi: 10.18805/ijar.v0iOF.7659.

Morphological studies were conducted on the skull of a hippopotamus brought to the Veterinary college for postmortem examination.  Skull of the hippopotamus was huge and notable for its little brain case and high supra-orbital ridges. The skull had a larger splanchnocranium than the neurocranium.  From the dorsal view, the skull had a watch glass appearance because of its narrow middle portion (at the region of maxillae) and wide caudal and rostral portions.  Maxilla showed a large Eminenta canina and two infraorbital foramina leading to two separate infraorbital canals. The premaxilla lodged two huge incisors and just above the central incisor, there was a large rough eminence for the elevated nostrils. Three to four large rounded lacrimal bullae were seen on the floor of the bony orbit.  Frontal bone presented a strongly convex smooth supra-orbital ridge that formed upper margin of the orbit which projected from the surface of the skull.  The median sagittal crest was very high that diverged to accommodate the concave forehead in front. Temporal fossa was very extensive.  Caudal surface of the skull showed a concave nuchal surface and the external occipital protuberance was in the form of a crest. The paramastoid process and external auditory process were very short. Bulla tympanica was conical with a pyramidal muscular process.  Anatomical peculiarities of the skull and their functional significance are discussed.

  1. Dyce, K.M., Sack, W.O. and Wensing, C.J.G. (1987). Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia. p. 856.

  2. Getty, R. (1975). Sisson and Grossman’s Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. Vols. 1 and 2. (5th Ed.) Philadelphia: W B. Saunders Company. 

  3. Nickel, R., Schummer, A. and Seiferle, E. (1986). The Anatomy of Domestic Animals-Vol.1. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, Hamburg. pp: 49-57.

  4. Raghu, N.K., Santhilakshmi, M., Purushotham, G., Sailaja, S.N. and Dhyana, V.R. (2014). Gross morphological studies on the giraffe skull (Giraffa camelopardalis). XXVIII- Annual convention of IAVA and National Symposium, RAJUVAS, Bikaner. p. 138.

  5. Vaughan, T. A. (1972). Mammalogy. W. B. saunders Company, Philadelphia. p. 463.

  6. Young, T. H. (1980). Preparation of skeletal specimen. Equine Pract. 2: 276. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)