Effect of exposure of sound signals in semen collection area on quantity and quality of semen in Hariana bulls

DOI: 10.18805/ijar.11418    | Article Id: B-3219 | Page : 438-443
Citation :- Effect of exposure of sound signals in semen collection areaon quantity and quality of semen in Hariana bulls .Indian Journal Of Animal Research.2018.(52):438-443

Archana Yadav, Yajuvendra Singh, Garima Shukla, P.K. Shukla, Muneendra Kumar, D.N. Singh and Ajay Kumar

archnasingh.yadav@gmail.com
Address :

Livestock Production Management, Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyay Pashu Chikitsa,
Vigyan Vishwavidyalaya Evam Go Anusandhan Sansthan, Mathura-281 001, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Submitted Date : 1-04-2016
Accepted Date : 14-07-2016

Abstract

The present experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of two different beats {100 and 150 BPM (Beat Per Minute)} of musical sound signals {intensity below 85 dB(decibel)} on reproductive performance of Hariana bulls maintained at semen biology lab of DDD (District Dairy Demonstration) Farm within the premises of Instructional Livestock Farm Complex (ILFC). The present experiment was carried out for an aggregate time period of three and half months (within autumn season) and was accomplished in three phases. Same four Hariana bulls were used as experimental animals in three different phases of experiments to avoid individual effect of bulls as well as to overcome the limitations of limited numbers of bulls. During the first (control) phase of experiment the bulls were not exposed to any additional source of sound (T1) except the normal environmental sound in the semen collection area. In second and third phase, bulls were exposed to a musical instrumental sound signal of 100 (T2) and 150 (T3) BPM with intensity below 85 dB.  Each phase of the experiment was done for a period of one month (four weeks) one after another in continuation but the third phase was started after a gap of three weeks from the second in order to cancel out the persistent effect of sound exposure to bulls during second phase of investigation. The effect of exposure of sound signals on volume (6.58±0.29) ml, concentration (1018.72±49.92) millions/ml, mass (3.98±0.07) and progressive motility (72.97±0.80%), head (1.93±0.21%), middle piece (0.63±0.15%), and tail (2.56±0.28%) of sperm and HOST (79.22±0.69) was highly significantly better (P<0.01), with an exposure of a sound signal of 150 BPM with intensity below 85 dB. 

Keywords

Hariana bull Reproductive performance Semen quantity Semen quality Sound exposure.

References

  1. Anzar, M., Ahmad, M., Nazir, M., Ahmad, N. and Shah, I. H. (1993). Selection of buffalo bull: Sexual behaviour and its relationship to semen and fertility. Theriogenology. 40: 1187-1198.
  2. Berman, J., Stádník, L., Ducháèek, J., Toušová, R., Louda, F. and Štolc, L. (2011). Effect of bulls’ breed, age and body condition score on quantitative and qualitative traits of their semen. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 59: 37-44.
  3. Blockey, M.A. de B. (1981). Development of a serving capacity test for beef bulls. Applied Anim. Ethol. 7: 307-319.
  4. Brito, L.F.C., Silva A.E.D.F., Rodrigues L.H., Vieira F.V., Deragon L.A.G. and Kastelic, J.P., (2002). Effects of environmental factors, age and genotype on sperm production and semen quality in Bos indicus and Bos Taurus AI bulls in Brazil, Anim. Reprod. Sci. 70: 181-190.
  5. Correa, J. R., and Zavos, P. M. (1994). The hypoosmotic swelling test: its employment as an assay to evaluate the functional integrity of the frozen-thawed bovine sperm membrane. Theriogenology, 42: 351-360.
  6. Dhanju, C.K., Ranjha, S., Cheema, C. and Kaur, P. (2006).Correlation of spermatozoa Freezability with semen characteristics in crossbred bulls. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 76: 241-243. 
  7. Foote, R.H. (1978). Factors influencing the quantity and quality of semen harvested from bulls, rams, boars and stallions. J. Anim. Sci. 47: 1-11.
  8. Hultnas, C.A. (1959). Studies on mating behaviour and semen picture in young bulls of the swedish red-and-white breed and on causes of this variation. Acta Agric. Scand. Supplement. 6: 1-81. 
  9. Leopold, R. A. (1976). The role of male accessory glands in insect reproduction. Annual review of entomology, 21: 199-221.
  10. Loubser, P.G., and Van Niekerk, C.H. (1983). Seasonal changes in sexual activity and semen quality in the Angora ram. 2. Semen volume, quality and freezability. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci.13: 161-163.
  11. Lunstra, D. D., Gregory, K. E. and Cundiff. L. V. (1988). Heritability estimates and adjustment factors for the effects of bulls age and age of dam on yearling testicular size in breeds of bulls. Theriogenology. 30: 127-136.
  12. Malejane, C.M., Greyling, J.P.C. and Raito, M.B. (2014). Seasonal variation in semen quality of Dorper rams using different collection techniques. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 44: 26-32.].
  13. Mukherjee, D.P. and Banerjee, G.C. (1980). Genetics and breeding of farm animals. Published by Oxford and IBM Publishing company, Calcutta. 297-301.
  14. Nelson’t, L. (2014). Sperm motility. Fertilization: Comparative Morphology, Biochemistry, and Immunology, 27.
  15. Patel, K. V., Dhami, A.J., and Kodagali, S.B. (1989). Seminal characteristics and their inter-relationships in Kankrej×Jersy and Kankrej×H.F. crossbred bulls. Indian Vet. J., 66:737-743. 
  16. Patterson, J.D., Gilbert, G.R., Krieger, K.E., Sales, M.A., Looper, M.L. and Rosenkrans, C.F. (2012). Season of collection and heat shock protein 70 haplotype influence semen quality characteristics of Holstein bulls. Arkansas Animal Science Department Report .
  17. Salisbury, G. W., VanDemark, N. L., and Lodge, J. R. (1978). Physiology of reproduction and artificial insemination of cattle (No. Ed. 2). WH Freeman and Company..
  18. Sarder, M.J.U. (2007). Environment related variations in the semen characteristics of bulls used for Artificial Insemination (AI) programme in Bangladesh. Univ. J. Zool. Rajshahi Univ. 26: 81-88.
  19. Saxena, V.B., Tripathi, S.S., and Manglik, V.P. (1979). Semen characteristics and preservability in Red Dane bulls. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 49: 878-883.
  20. Shalash, M.R. (1984). Some aspects of mating behaviour in male buffalo and camel under the Egyptain environment Cong. 10th Int. Anim. Reprod. and A.I. University of Illinois, Urbana-Campaign.. 272.
  21. Tomar, N.S., Misra, B.S. and Johari, C.B. (1966). Seasonal variations in reaction time and semen production and prediction of some semen attributes on initial motility of spermatozoa in Hariana and Murrah bulls. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 19: 87-93.
  22. Tomar, S.S. and Gupta, H.C.L. (1984). Effect of season onsex desire and semen quality of Hariana bulls. Indian J. Anim. Health. 19: 37-40. 
  23. Tomer, S.S. and Kanaujia, A.S. (1970). Seasonal variation in reaction time and semen characteristics of Hariana bulls. J. Res. 7: 541-545
  24. Vosoughi, S., Khavanin, A., Salehnia, M., Mahabadi, H.A. and Soleimanian, A. (2012). Effects of simultaneous exposure to formaldehyde vapor and noise on mouse testicular tissue and sperm parameters. J. Health Scope.1: 110-117.
  25. Younis, A.A., Shalash, M.R., Hassan, S.G. and Taha, A. (1980). Effect of locality on sexual desire and semen characters of Egyptian buffalo bulls. Proceed. 9th Int. Congr. Anim. Reprod. A.I. 583-587. 

Global Footprints