Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 51 issue 4 (august 2017) : 737-741

Diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in livestock using gamma interferon assay and single intradermal comparative tuberculin test in Assam and Meghalaya

Acheenta G. Barua, Himangshu Raj, Ashok Kumar, Chandana C. Barua, Arundhati Purkayastha, Pompy Patowary
1<p>Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati-781 022, India.</p>
Cite article:- Barua G. Acheenta, Raj Himangshu, Kumar Ashok, Barua C. Chandana, Purkayastha Arundhati, Patowary Pompy (2017). Diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in livestock using gamma interferon assay and single intradermal comparative tuberculin test in Assam and Meghalaya . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 51(4): 737-741. doi: 10.18805/ijar.v0iOF.7662.

ABSTRACT

The present study was carried out to investigate the diagnostic potential of gamma interferon (IFN-ã) assay and single intradermal comparative tuberculin test (SICTT), including species specification of bovine tuberculosis infection in different livestock farms of Assam and Meghalaya. A total of 199 animals (cattle and buffalo) were examined for bovine tuberculosis symptoms and swab samples were cultured. Biochemical tests and PCR were used for species specification of bovine tuberculosis. Out of 199 cases examined, 33 (16.58%) showed positive for SICTT, 39 (19.59%) for IFN-ã and 35(17.59%) for PCR. Based on PCR targeting pncA region, the confirmation was done for M. Bovis. IFN-ã thus ensures a sensitive and specific detection of early bovine tuberculosis infection together with SICTT and hence may be considered as a screening method of choice. 

REFERENCES


  1. Alvarez, J., de Juan, L., Bezos, J., Romero, B., Saez, J.L., Marques, S., Dominguez, C., Mínguez, O., Fernandez-Mardomingo, B., Mateos, A., Dominguez, L., Aranaz, A. (2009). Effect of paratuberculosis on the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis in a cattle herd with a mixed infection using interferon-gamma detection assay. Vet Microbiol., 135:389–393.

  2. Altman, D.G. (1991). Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman and Hall London

  3. Cagiola, M., Feliziani, F., Severi, G., Pasquali, P., Rutili, D. (2004) Analysis of possible factors affecting the specificity of the gamma interferon test in tuberculosis-free cattle herds. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol., 11:952–956.

  4. Clegg, T.A., Duignan, A., Whelan, C., Gormley, E., Good, M., Clarke, J., Toft, N., More, S.J. (2011). Using latent class analysis to estimate the test characteristics of the gamma-interferon test, the single intradermal comparative tuberculin test and a multiplex immunoassay under Irish conditions. Vet Microbiol., 151:68–76.

  5. de la Rua-Domenech, R., Goodchild, A.T., Vordermeier, H.M., Hewinson, R.G., Christiansen, K.H., Clifton-Hadley, R.S. (2006). Ante mortem diagnosis of tuberculosis in cattle: a review of the tuberculin tests, gamma-interferon assay and other ancillary diagnostic techniques. Res. Vet. Sci., 81:190–210.

  6. De Los Monteros, L.E.E., Galan, J.C., Gutierrez, S.S., Marin, J.F.G., Matin, C., Dominguez, L., Rafael, L., Baquero, F., Gomez-Mampaso, E., Blasquez, J. (1998). Allele-specific PCR method based on pncA and oxyR for distinguishing Mycobacterium bovis from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Intraspecific M. bovis pncA sequence polymorphism. J. Clin. Microbiol., 36:239–242.

  7. D.V. Gadre, D.V., Mahajan, M., Singh, N.R., Agarwal, D.S., Talwar, V. (1995). Niacin test for mycobacteria: a comparative Study of two methods. Indian. J. Tub., 42: 225-226

  8. Good, M., Clegg, T.A., Murphy, F., More, S.J. (2011). The comparative performance of the single intradermal comparative tuberculin test in Irish cattle, using tuberculin PPD combinations from different manufacturers. Vet. Microbiol., 151:77–84.

  9. Gormley, E., Doyle, M., Duignan, A., Good, M., More, S.J. Clegg, T.A. (2013). Identification of risk factors associated with disclosure of false positive bovine tuberculosis reactors using the gamma-interferon (IFNã) assay. Veterinary Research, 44:117

  10. Inwald, J., Hinds, J., Palmer, S., Dale, J., Butcher, P.D., Hewinson, R.G., Gordon, S.V. (2003). Genomic analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains used for production of purified protein derivative. J. Clin. Microbiol., 41:3929–3932.

  11. Karolemeas K, de la Rua-Domenech R, Cooper R, Goodchild AV, Clifton-Hadley RS, et al. (2012) Estimation of the relative sensitivity of the comparative tuberculin skin test in tuberculous cattle herds subjected to depopulation. PLoS One 7: e43217

  12. Kubica, G.P. and Wayne, L.G. (1984). Clinical microbiology. In: The Mycobacteria, a Source book, Part A. Marul Dekker, Inc, New York, Basel, pp. 156

  13. Lall, J.M. (1969). Tuberculosis among animals in India. Vet. bull., 39(6):680-685.

  14. Monaghan, M.L., Doherty, M.L., Collins, J.D., Kazda, J.F., Quinn, P.J. (1994). The tuberculin test. Vet. Microbiol., 40:111–124.

  15. Monaghan, M., Quinn, P.J., Kelly, A.P., McGill, K., McMurray, C., O’Crowley, K., Bassett, H.F., Costello, E., Quigley, F.C., Rothel, J.S.,Wood, P.R., Collins, J.D. (1997). A pilot trial to the evaluate the g-interferon assay for the detection of Mycobacterium bovis infected cattle under Irish conditions. Irish Vet. J., 50:229–232.

  16. Pollock, J.M., Welsh, M.D., McNair, J. (2005). Immune responses in bovine tuberculosis: towards new strategies for the diagnosis and control of disease. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 108:37–43.

  17. Palmer, M.V., Waters, W.R., Thacker, T.C., Greenwald, R., Esfandiari, J., Lyashchenko, K.P. (2006). Effects of different tuberculin skin-testing regimens on gamma interferon and antibody responses in cattle experimentally infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Clin. Vaccine Immunol., 13:387-394.

  18. Skinner, M.A., Parlane, N., McCarthy, A., Buddle, B.M. (2003). Cytotoxic T-cell responses to Mycobacterium bovis during experimental infection of cattle with bovine tuberculosis. Immunology, 110:234–241.

  19. Tameni, S., Amadori, M., Scaccaglia, P., Quondam-Giandomenico, R., Tagliabue, S., Achetti, I.L., Adone, R., Ciuchini, F. (1998). Quality controls and in vitro diagnostic efficiency of bovine PPD tuberculins. Biologicals, 26:225–235.

  20. Thakur, A., Sharma, M., Katoch, V.C., Dhar, P., Katoch, R.C.. (2010). A study on the prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in farmed dairy cattle in Himachal Pradesh. Vet. World. 3:409-414.

  21. Wayne, L.G. (1974). Simple pyrazinamidase and urease test for routine identification of Mycobacteris. Am. Rev. Resp. Dis., 109:147-51

     
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)