Concentrate feeding to dairy cattle: Adoption status and factors affecting its adoption in India

DOI: 10.18805/ijar.11179    | Article Id: B-2957 | Page : 788-793
Citation :- Concentrate feeding to dairy cattle: Adoption statusand factors affecting its adoption in India .Indian Journal Of Animal Research.2016.(50):788-793

Prakashkumar Rathod*, Mahesh Chander and Dwaipayan Bardhan

prakashkumarkr@gmail.com
Address :

Division of Extension Education, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar-243 122, India.

Submitted Date : 26-02-2015
Accepted Date : 4-12-2015

Abstract

An attempt was made to study the adoption status of concentrate feeding and to identify factors affecting its adoption in India through primary data collection from 360 dairy farmers. The study revealed that majority of the respondents had not adopted this practice, followed by full and partial adoption in the study area. Further, the study also pointed out that about 21 per cent farmers adopted concentrate feeding since 3-6 years, while about 19 per cent farmers had adopted the practice from 6-9 years. The adoption status revealed that there was highly significant difference across the states for concentrate feeding in dairying. Multinomial logit model depicted the Chi-square value of 144.84 indicating that the model was highly significant (p<0.001). The study suggested that researchers and extension experts need to make farmers more aware about the benefits of concentrate feeding to improve productivity in the dairy sector. Further, the scientists have to analyse the problems of dairy farmers and find suitable solutions for higher diffusion and adoption at field conditions by participatory technology generation and transfer approach with adequate representation of farmers so that their feedback can be taken into consideration.

Keywords

Adoption Dairy innovation Livestock technology Multinomial logit model.

References

  1. Abdulai, A. and Huffman, W.E. (2005). The diffusion of new agricultural technologies: The case of crossbred-cow technology in Tanzania. Am. J. Agric. Econ., 87: 645-659.
  2. ADB (Asian Development Bank). (1993). Policies and strategies for livestock development: Regional seminar on policies and strategies for livestock development, 18-22 January 1993.Manila, Philippines.
  3. Chander, M., Dutt, T., Ravikumar, R. and Subrahmanyeswari, B. (2010). Livestock technology transfer service in India: A review. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 80: 1115–25.
  4. FAOSTAT. (2014). Retrieved from http://faostat.fao.org/ {20-July-2014}
  5. GOI. (2012 a). Nineteenth Livestock Census, Department of Animal Husbandry Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi, India. Available at http://dahd.nic.in/dahd/WriteReadData/    Livestock.pdf (accessed on 29-11-2014).
  6. GOI. (2012 b). Report of the Working Group on Animal Husbandry and Dairying. 12th Five year plan, 2012- 2017. Planning Commission, New Delhi. Available at http://planningcommission.gov.in/aboutus/committee/wrkgrp12/agri/    AHD_REPORT_Final_rev.pdf (accessed on 29-11-2014).
  7. Kurup, M.P. G. (2011). Technologies and practices for improving livestock feeding in India, pp: 7-10. In: Harinder P S Makkar (eds), Successes and failures with animal nutrition practices and technologies in developing countries, Proceedings of the FAO Electronic conference,1-30 September, 2010. FAO, Rome, Italy, 165p.
  8. Menale, K., Zikhali, P., Kebede, M. and Edwards, S. (2009). Adoption of organic farming techniques: Evidence from a semi-arid region of Ethiopia. Environment for Development, Ef D DP 09-01.
  9. Prasad, C. S. (2011). Dairy production, quality control and marketing system in India. In: Pal, S. K. and Siddiky, N. A. (eds). Dairy production, quality control and marketing system in SAARC Countries. pp: 53-122. Available at http://www.saarcagri.org/images/abook_file/wp_2011_02.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2015)
  10. Pundo, M.O. and Fraser, G.C.G. (2006). Multinomial logit analysis of household cooking fuel choice in rural Kenya: The case of Kisumu district. Agrekon., 45: 24-37.
  11. Rangnekar, D. V. (2011). Change in animal nutrition research paradigm needed to benefit resource-poor livestock producers in countries like India, pp:1-6. In: Harinder P S Makkar, (eds), Successes and failures with animal nutrition practices and technologies in developing countries, Proceedings of the FAO Electronic conference, 1-30 September, 2010. FAO, Rome, Italy, 165p.
  12. Rao, S. V. N., Rangnekar, D.V., Dey, R. and Van Den Ban, A. W. (1995). Farmers’ perception of innovations. Hand book for Straw Feeding System, 107-16.
  13. Rathod, P. and Chander, M. (2014). Identification of socio-economically important dairy innovations in India: A perspective of scientists. In: E. Karamidehkordi (eds), Proceedings of the First International Conference of the Asia and Pacific Islands Rural Advisory Services (APIRAS) and the Fifth Congress of Extension and Education in Agriculture and Natural Resources Management: Facilitating Information and Innovations for Empowering Family Farmers. 2-4 September, 2014, University of Zanjan, Iran. pp-101. Available at http://www.iaeea.ir/files/site1/Docs_ documents/conference_farsi/5th_Congress/total_english_abstract_book.pdf (accessed on 14 January 2015)
  14. Rathod, P., Hiremath, S., Manjunathachar, H. V., Balaraj, B. L. and Bangar, Y. (2014). Adoption of livestock innovations and factors affecting their adoption in Bidar district of Karnataka. The Indian J. of Field Veterinarians, 9:62-65.
  15. Rezvanfar, A. (2007). Communication and socio-personal factors influencing adoption of dairy farming technologies amongst livestock farmers. Livestock Res. for Rural Dev., 19 (33) Retrieved September 3, 2013, from http://    www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/3/rezv19033.htm
  16. Singh, B. P., Sharma, M. C. and Tiwari, R. (2009). Feeding resources and management among poor livestock keeper: A field study in linkage villages. The Indian J. Anim. Sci., 79: 1263–1264.
  17. Tizale, C.Y. (2007). The dynamics of soil degradation and incentives for optimal management in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Thesis, Ph.D. Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria.
  18. Torsten, H., Garcia, O. and Saha, A. (2003). A review of milk production in India with particular emphasis on small scale producers, PPLPI working paper 2.
  19. Walli, T. K. (2014). The feeding of by-products on small holder dairy farms in Asia and other tropical regions. In: John Moran (eds), Final report of E-Conference held in November-December 2013, FAO, Rome.

Global Footprints