Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 49 issue 2 (april 2015) : 241-247

Effect of reduced floor space allowances on performance of crossbred weaner barrows

Sandeep Kaswan*, B.H.M. Patel, S.K. Mondal, T. Dutt, M.R. Verma, A.K. Verma, Deepak Upadhyay
1Livestock Production & Management Section, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly-243 122, India.
Cite article:- Kaswan* Sandeep, Patel B.H.M., Mondal S.K., Dutt T., Verma M.R., Verma A.K., Upadhyay Deepak (2024). Effect of reduced floor space allowances on performance of crossbred weaner barrows. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 49(2): 241-247. doi: 10.5958/09760-555.2015.00036.9.

ABSTRACT

Study was conducted in 36 crossbred (Landrace x Desi) weaned male piglets (6 weeks of age) divided into three groups (n=12) based on space allocation viz. T1 {0.9 m2/weaner pig- as per Indian Standards (IS)}, T2 (0.6 m2/pig- 33% reduction of IS) and T3 (0.45 m2/pig- 50% reduction of IS). The average initial (6 week) and final (14 week) body weight of weaner barrows were 8.67±0.26, 9.01±0.33, 9.13±0.36 kg and 19.57±1.19, 21.02±1.22, 21.55±1.28 kg for T1, T2 and T3 groups, respectively. Average total body weight gain during the experimental period was 10.90±1.09, 12.01±0.97 and 12.42±1.19 kg for T1, T2 and T3 groups, respectively. Average daily gain (ADG) of weaner barrows during the experimental period was 194.72±19.46, 214.44±17.37 and 221.73±21.23 g/day for T1, T2 and T3 groups, respectively. The overall feed conversion efficiency (FCE) for T1, T2 and T3 groups for whole period was 0.477±0.009, 0.447±0.006 and 0.461±0.011, respectively. Main economic indicators like ADG, FCE and health indicators like mean total lesion score and mean lesion score of body parts (except head and ears) did not differ significantly among groups and these values were within the acceptable limits. Even lowest k value (coefficient used for floor space allocation based on body weight of pigs) i.e. for T3 group, was higher than suggested critical k value in western countries and performance of animals of this group were also not affected. Therefore, weaner barrows of up to 20 kg body weight can be reared in economically efficient manner using 0.45 m2/pig space allowance in Indian conditions.

REFERENCES

  1. Anil, L., Anil, S.S. and Deen, J. (2007). Effects of allometric space allowance and weight group composition on grower-    finisher pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 87: 139-151.
  2. Averós, X., Brossard, L., Dourmad, J.Y., de Greef, K.H., Edge, H.L., Edwards, S.A., Meunier-Salaün. (2010). Quantitative assessment of the effects of space allowance, group size and floor characteristics on the lying behaviour of growing–    ûnishing pigs. Animal 4: 777-783.
  3. Barnett, J.L., Hemsworth, P.H. and Hand, A.M. (1983). Effects of chronic stress on some blood parameters in the pig. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 9: 273-277.
  4. Baxter, S. (1984). Intensive Pig Production: Environmental Management and Design. Granada Publishing Ltd, London Beattie, V.E., Walker, N. and Sneddon, I.A. (1996). An investigation of the effect of environmental enrichment and space allowance on the behavior and production of growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 48: 151-158.
  5. Bhat, P.N., Mohan N.H. and Sukh Deo. (2010). Pig production. Studium Press (India) Pvt. Ltd. Darya Ganj, New Delhi.
  6. Brumm, M. (2010). Designing production facilities for pig comfort in Argentinian conditions. Sitio Argentino de Producción Animal. Memorias del X Congreso Nacional de Producción Porcina, Mendoza, Argentina, 2010 pp:89-96.
  7. Brumm, M.C., Miller, P.S. and Thaler, R.C. (2004). Response of barrows to space allocation and ractopamine. J. Anim. Sci. 82: 3373-3379.
  8. Brumm, M.C., Ellis, M., Johnston, L.J., Rozeboom, D.W. and Zimmerman, D.R. (2001). Interaction of swine nursery and grow-finish space allocations on performance. J. Anim. Sci. 79: 1967-1972.
  9. Cho, J.H. and Kim, I.H. (2011). Effect of stocking density on pig production. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10(63): 13688-13692.
  10. De Greef, K.H., Vermeer, H.M., Houwers, H.W.J. and Bos, A.P. (2011). Proof of Principle of the Comfort Class concept in pigs. Experimenting in the midst of a stakeholder process on pig welfare. Livest. Sci. 139: 172-185.
  11. DeDecker, J.M., M. Ellis, B.F. Wolter, B.P. Corrigan, S.E. Curtis and G.R. Hollis. (2005). Effect of stocking rate on pig performance in a wean-to-finish production system. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 85: 1-5.
  12. Done, T., Hayne, S.M. and Gonyou, H.W. (2006). The effects of crowding on the performance of grower and finisher pigs on fully and partially slatted floors. In: 25th Centralia Swine Research Update. II-40, January 25, 2006 Kirkton, Ontario, Canada.
  13. Food and Agriculture Organization (2009). Red Meat: Agribusiness Handbook. Investment Centre Division, FAO. Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy.
  14. Gonyou, H.W., Deen, J., McGlone, J.J., Sundberg, P.L, Brumm, M., Spoolder, H., Kliebenstein, J., Buhr, B. and Johnson, A.K. (2004). Developing a model to determine floor space requirements for pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 82(Suppl. 1). (Abstr.)
  15. Gonyou, H.W., M.C. Brumm, E. Bush, J. Deen, S.A. Edwards, T. Fangman, J.J. McGlone, M. Meunier-Salaun, R.B. Morrison, H. Spoolder, P.L. Sundberg and A.K. Johnson. (2006). Application of broken-line analysis to assess floor space requirements of nursery and grower-finisher pigs expressed on an allometric basis. J. Anim. Sci. 84: 229-235.
  16. Indian Standard (IS: 3916-1966). (1966). Code of practice for pig housing. Indian Standard Institution, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi.
  17. Jensen, M.B., Studnitz, M. and Pedersen, L.J. (2010). The effect of type of rooting material and space allowance on exploration and abnormal behaviour in growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 123: 87-92.
  18. Kornegay, E.T. and Notter, D.R. (1984). Effects of floor space and number of pigs per pen on performance. Pig News and Information 5: 23-29.
  19. Kornegay, E.T., Lindemann, M.D. and Ravindran, V. (1993). Effects of dietary lysine levels on performance and immune response of weanling pigs housed at two floor space allowances. J. Anim. Sci. 71: 552-556.
  20. Kyriazakis, I. and Whittemore, C.T. (2006). Whittemore’s science and practice of pig production. 3rd Ed., Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK.
  21. Leek, A.B., Sweeney, G.B.T., Duffy, P., Beattie, V.E. and O’Doherty, J.V. (2004). The effect of stocking density and social regrouping stressors on growth performance, carcass characteristics, nutrient digestibility and physiological stress responses in pigs. Anim. Sci. 79: 109-119.
  22. Marchant-Forde, J.N. (2009). The Welfare of Pigs: Animal Welfare Series. 7: Springer Science+Business Media B.V. Oosterwijk, G., Van Aken, D. and Vongthilath, S. (2003). A Manual on Improved Rural Pig Production (1st Edition, English Language). Department of Livestock and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Vientiane, Lao PDR. VIII pp:15.
  23. Petherick J.C., Beattie, A.W. and Bodero, D.A.V. (1989). The effect of group size on the performance of growing pigs. Anim. Prod. 49: 497-502.
  24. Petherick, J.C. (1983). A biological basis for the design of space in livestock housing. In: Baxter, S.H., Baxter, M.R. and MacCormack, J.A.D. (eds) Farm Animal Housing and Welfare, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Lancaster, UK, pp:103–120.
  25. Rossi, R., Costa, A., Guarino, M., Laicini, F. Pastorelli, G. and Corino, C. (2008). Effect of group size-floor space allowance and floor type on growth performance and carcass characteristics of heavy pigs. J. Swine Health Prod. 16(6): 304-311.
  26. Sharma, P.K., Saikia, S. and Baruah, K.K. (2004). Effect of stocking density on growth performance and feed efficiency of Hampshire grower pigs reared under identical feeding and management. Indian Vet. J. 81(3): 299-301.
  27. Sinha, S.K., Singh, R.A., Sharma, B.D. and Dubey, C. (1990). Effect of floor space on quantitative carcass characters of Large White Yorkshire. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 60: 1006-1009.
  28. Smith, L.F., Beaulieu, A.D., Patience, J.F., Gonyou, H.W. and Boyd, R.D. (2004). The impact of feeder adjustment and group size-floor space allowance on the performance of nursery pigs. J. Swine Health Prod. 12(3): 111-118.
  29. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.S. (1994). Statistical Methods. 9th edition. Iowa State University press, Ames. Turner, S.P., Farnworth, M.J., White, I.M.S., Brotherstone, S., Mendl, M., Knap, P., Penny, P. and Lawrence, A.B. (2006). The accumulation of skin lesions and their use as a predictor of individual aggressiveness in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 96: 245–259.
  30. Turner, S.P., Allcroft, D.J. and Edwards, S.A. (2003). Housing pigs in large social groups: a review of implications for performance and other economic traits. Livest. Prod. Sci. 82: 39-51.
  31. Turner, S.P., Ewen, M., Rooke, J.A. and Edwards, S.A. (2000). The effect of space allowance on performance, aggression and immune competence of growing pigs housed on straw deep-litter at different group sizes. Livest. Prod. Sci. 66: 47-55.
  32. Wolter, B.F., Ellis, M., Corrigan, B.P., DeDecker, J.M., Curtis, S.E., Parr, E.N. and Webel, D.M. (2003). Effect of restricted post-weaning growth resulting from reduced floor and feeder-trough space on pig growth performance to slaughter weight in a wean-to-finish production system. J. Anim. Sci. 81: 836-842.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)