Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 48 issue 4 (august 2014) : 398-400

ANATOMICAL STUDIES ON SHELL GLAND IN ADULT INDIGENOUS CHICKEN (GALLUS DOMESTICS) OF ASSAM

S.K. Bharti*, A.K. Gautam
1College of Veterniary Science Assam Agriculture University, Kanapur, Guwahati-781 001, India
Cite article:- Bharti* S.K., Gautam A.K. (2024). ANATOMICAL STUDIES ON SHELL GLAND IN ADULT INDIGENOUS CHICKEN (GALLUS DOMESTICS) OF ASSAM. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 48(4): 398-400. doi: 10.5958/0976–0555.2014.00464.6.

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted to reveal the gross and histomorphological structures of shell gland in indigenous chicken of Assam. The mucosa of shell gland showed many leaf shaped folds which were mainly primary and secondary types and was lined by pseudo stratified ciliated columnar epithelium. The lamina propria-submucosaconsisted of branched tubular glands with pyramidal shaped cells with diffusely granular and vacuolated cytoplasm. It contained large amount of reticularfibers mainly towards the centre of the folds and somewhat less amount of collagen and elastic fibres. The lining epithelium showed intense PAS positive reaction while strongly in lamina-propria and at tunica muscularis.

REFERENCES

  1. Banks, W.J. (1986). Applied Veterinary Histology.2nd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Los Angeles, pp.511-516.
  2. Culling, C.F.A. (1974). Handbook of Histomorphological and Histochemical Techniques. 3rdedn., Butterworth and Co., London.
  3. Dellmann, H.D. and Carithers, J.R. (1996). Cytology and Microscopic Anatomy. 5thedn., Lea and Febiger, Box 3024,         USA. pp. 275-277.
  4. Dyce, K.M.; Sack, W.O. and Wensing, C.J.G. (1987). A Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy. 2ndedn., W.B. Saunders         Company, Philadelphia, pp. 791-792.
  5. Gracey, J.F. (1986). Bleeding Method of Slaughtering-Slaughter.Meat Hygiene. 8thedn., pp. 144-145.
  6. King, A.S. and McLelland, J. (1975). Outline of Avian Anatomy.BaillerTindall, London. pp. 65.
  7. Luna, L.G. (1968). Manuals of Histologic Staining Methods of Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 3rdedn.,McGraw         Hill Book Co., London.
  8. Saber,A.S. M.Emara,S.A and AboSaeda,O.M.M. (2009). Light, Scanning and Transmission Electron Micro-scopical         Study on the Oviduct of the Ostrich (Stru-thiocamelus)J. 2: 79 - 89
  9. Solomon, S. E. (2002). The Oviduct in Chaos.World’sPoult. Sci. J. 58:41–48.
  10. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1994). Statistical Methods.8thedn.Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)