Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 49 issue 1 (february 2015) : 109-113

Effect of nano-material combination on various performance traits of Japanese quails

A.A. Khan*, D. Chaudhuri, S.K. Mishra1, Raj Narayan
1Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Barielly-243 122, India.
Cite article:- Khan* A.A., Chaudhuri D., Mishra1 S.K., Narayan Raj (2024). Effect of nano-material combination on various performance traits of Japanese quails. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 49(1): 109-113. doi: 10.5958/0976-0555.2015.00022.9.

ABSTRACT

Effect of combination of two nano-materials: Nano Germanium (NG) and Nano Selenium (NS) on Japanese quails was investigated. Five solutions(treatments) were prepared in such a way that: T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 contained 10 & 5; 15 & 7.5; 20 & 10; 40 & 20 and 75 & 37.5 ppb of NG and NS (combined in each treatments) respectively while the solution: T1 (control) contained only distilled water. Respective solutions (@ 0.5ml/bird) were administered orally to birds daily for eight-weeks continuously. Highest egg production (hen-housed and hen-day) and best FCR (Kg feed per dozen eggs and Kg feed per Kg egg mass) was obtained in the T5, however, no significant difference in egg quality, carcass-traits and immune-competence could be observed between the control and treatments. It was inferred that oral administration of two combined nano-materials used in present study improved overall egg production in quails and the dose combination used in T5 was the best. Administration of the nano-combinations had no adverse effects on egg-quality, carcass-yield, slaughter traits and immune-competence.

REFERENCES

  1. Biswas, A.; Mohan,, J.; Sastry, K.V. H., and Tyagi, J. S. (2008) Effect of higher levels of dietary Vitamin E on performance and immune response in growing Japanese quail. J. App. Anim. Res. 33: 61-64
  2. Bollo, E. (2007) Nanotechnologies applied to veterinary diagnostics. Vet. Res. Commu. 31: 145–147.
  3. Cheng, S and Lamont, S. J. (1988) Genetic-analysis of immune-competence measures in a white leghorn chicken line, Poult. Sci. 67: 989–995
  4. FOE, (2008). Friends of the Earth. Out of the laboratory and onto our plates: Nanotechnology in Food and Agriculture. http://www.foe.org/pdf/nano_food.pdf,
  5. Huang, B., Zhang, J., Hou, J. and Chen, C. (2003) Free radical scavenging efficiency of Nano-Se in vitro Free. Radical Biology Medicine 35:805-13
  6. Jafar (2008) Patent application filed to USPTO IPC8 Class: AA61K914FI USPC Class: 424489
  7. Joseph, T. and Morrison, M. (2006) Nanotechnology in agriculture and food. Institute of Nanotechnology, European Nanotechnology Gateway. http://www.nanoforum.org.
  8. Kuzma, J. and Verhage, P. (2006) Nanotechnology in Agriculture and Food Production. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC, pp. 1–42.
  9. Narducci, D. (2007) An introduction to nanotechnologies: what’s in it for us? Vet Res Commu. 31: 131–137.
  10. Maynard, A.D. 2007. Nanotechnology: the next big thing, or much ado about nothing? Annals Occupational Hygeine 51: 1–12.
  11. NNI, (2007). National Nanotechnology Initiative: What is nanotechnology? http://www.nano.gov/ html/facts/what Is Nano.html
  12. Oberdorster, G., Oberdorster, E. and Oberdorster, J. (2005) Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspectives 113: 823–839.
  13. PEN (2008) Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies: A nanotechnology consumer products inventory. http://    www.nanotechproject.org/44/ consumer-nanotechnology.
  14. Siegal, P. B and Gross, W. B. (1980) Production and non-persistence of antibodies in chicken to sheep erythrocytes. 1. Directional selection. Poult Sci. 59: 1-5.
  15. Scott, N. and Chen, H. (2003) Nanoscale science and engineering for agriculture and food systems. A National Planning Workshop. November 18–19, 2002. http://www. nseafs. cornell.edu/ web. roadmap.pdf,
  16. Scott, N. R. (2005) Nanotechnology and animal health. Review Science Technology Office International Epizoonotics 24: 425–432.
  17. Wang, Y. (2009) Differential effects of sodium selenite and nano-Se on growth performance, tssue Se distribution, and glutathione per-oxidase activity of avian broiler. Biol Trace Element Res. 128: 184–190
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)