Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 48 issue 5 (october 2014) : 486-490,   Doi: 10.5958/0976-0555.2014.00016.8

STUDIES ON UTILIZATION PATTERN OF CAMEL AND TRACTOR IN HOT ARID DESERT ECOSYSTEMQ

C
Champak Bhakat*
N
N.V. Patil
1National Research Centre on Camel, Jorbner, Bikaner – 334 001, India
Cite article:- Bhakat* Champak, Patil N.V. (2025). STUDIES ON UTILIZATION PATTERN OF CAMEL AND TRACTOR IN HOT ARID DESERT ECOSYSTEMQ. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 48(5): 486-490. doi: 10.5958/0976-0555.2014.00016.8.

ABSTRACT

The present farming system research was carried out in eighteen arid villages of two districts in Rajasthan covering four zones.  Analysis of data indicated that mixed farming (51.08%) was the major occupation although 48.91 % of respondents opted animal husbandry as major occupation. The advantages of camel in comparison to tractor were so many where as maximum number of demerits of tractor in comparison to camel were perceived by arid farmers with  favorable attitude towards the utilization of camel. Most of the farmers having  1 camel (88.64%) fed their animal at household level where as farmers having more than 4 camels, majority of them reared their camel in extensive management practices. The Chi-square test indicated that camel keeping pattern significantly (P

REFERENCES

  1. Bhakat, C. and Pathak, K. M. L. (2009). Socio-economic aspects of dromedary camel management in hot arid desert ecosystem. Indian J Anim Sci. 79: 700-705.
  2. Bhakat, C. Chaturvedi, D. and Sahani, M. S. (2003). Studies on farming use of camel and bullock systems in hot arid villages of Thar desert. Indian J Anim Res. 37: 1-7.
  3. Bhaskaran, K. and Praveena, C. (1982). Adoption of improved dry land agricultural technology in an integrated dry land agricultural development project in A. P. Indian J. Ext Edu 18: 32-39.
  4. Cartman (1994). National conference on policies and programmes for modernisation of draught animal power system. New Delhi, 4 - 5 March.
  5. Mishra T N (1986). Energy analysis of major crops of Tarai regions of UP. Ph.D Thesis. G B Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India.
  6. Natarajan, A and Mahesh, C. (2009). Farmers’ attitude towards utilization of draught bullocks in Indian agriculture. Livestock Res. Rural Develop. 21: 98 – 102.
  7. Rajput, D. S. and Tripathi, H. (2005). Camel husbandry practices followed by Raika pastoralists under semi-intensive system in Bikaner district of Rajasthan. Indian J Anim. Sci. 75: 1307-1313.
  8. Sastry,  N.S.R. and Thomas, C. K. (2005). Livestock Production Management, 4th  Edition. Kalyani Publishers; p : 449.
  9. Singh, G. (1999). Characteristics and use of draught animal power in India. Indian J Anim. Sci. 69 : 621 – 627.
  10. Snedecor, W. G. and Cochran, G. W. (1989). Statistical Methods. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi, India.
Published In
Indian Journal of Animal Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 48 issue 5 (october 2014) : 486-490,   Doi: 10.5958/0976-0555.2014.00016.8

    STUDIES ON UTILIZATION PATTERN OF CAMEL AND TRACTOR IN HOT ARID DESERT ECOSYSTEMQ

    C
    Champak Bhakat*
    N
    N.V. Patil
    1National Research Centre on Camel, Jorbner, Bikaner – 334 001, India
    Cite article:- Bhakat* Champak, Patil N.V. (2025). STUDIES ON UTILIZATION PATTERN OF CAMEL AND TRACTOR IN HOT ARID DESERT ECOSYSTEMQ. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 48(5): 486-490. doi: 10.5958/0976-0555.2014.00016.8.

    ABSTRACT

    The present farming system research was carried out in eighteen arid villages of two districts in Rajasthan covering four zones.  Analysis of data indicated that mixed farming (51.08%) was the major occupation although 48.91 % of respondents opted animal husbandry as major occupation. The advantages of camel in comparison to tractor were so many where as maximum number of demerits of tractor in comparison to camel were perceived by arid farmers with  favorable attitude towards the utilization of camel. Most of the farmers having  1 camel (88.64%) fed their animal at household level where as farmers having more than 4 camels, majority of them reared their camel in extensive management practices. The Chi-square test indicated that camel keeping pattern significantly (P

    REFERENCES

    1. Bhakat, C. and Pathak, K. M. L. (2009). Socio-economic aspects of dromedary camel management in hot arid desert ecosystem. Indian J Anim Sci. 79: 700-705.
    2. Bhakat, C. Chaturvedi, D. and Sahani, M. S. (2003). Studies on farming use of camel and bullock systems in hot arid villages of Thar desert. Indian J Anim Res. 37: 1-7.
    3. Bhaskaran, K. and Praveena, C. (1982). Adoption of improved dry land agricultural technology in an integrated dry land agricultural development project in A. P. Indian J. Ext Edu 18: 32-39.
    4. Cartman (1994). National conference on policies and programmes for modernisation of draught animal power system. New Delhi, 4 - 5 March.
    5. Mishra T N (1986). Energy analysis of major crops of Tarai regions of UP. Ph.D Thesis. G B Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, India.
    6. Natarajan, A and Mahesh, C. (2009). Farmers’ attitude towards utilization of draught bullocks in Indian agriculture. Livestock Res. Rural Develop. 21: 98 – 102.
    7. Rajput, D. S. and Tripathi, H. (2005). Camel husbandry practices followed by Raika pastoralists under semi-intensive system in Bikaner district of Rajasthan. Indian J Anim. Sci. 75: 1307-1313.
    8. Sastry,  N.S.R. and Thomas, C. K. (2005). Livestock Production Management, 4th  Edition. Kalyani Publishers; p : 449.
    9. Singh, G. (1999). Characteristics and use of draught animal power in India. Indian J Anim. Sci. 69 : 621 – 627.
    10. Snedecor, W. G. and Cochran, G. W. (1989). Statistical Methods. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi, India.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Animal Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)