DOI: 10.5958/j.0976-0555.48.1.012    | Article Id: B-2473 | Page : 59-62
Citation :- ULTRASONOGRAPHY OF TEAT IN SURTI GOATS.Indian Journal Of Animal Research.2014.(48):59-62
Mehraj u din dar, D.K. Tiwari, S.K. Jhala, D.B. Patil*, P.V. Parikh, Nisha Joy and K.N. Wadhwani db1608@gmail.com
Address : College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural University, Anand- 388 001, India


The present study was conducted on twenty clinically healthy adult surti goats weighing 15 to 20 kg, free from clinical and sub-clinical mastitis or teat injuries. Teats were examined by ultrasonography (USG) with 7.5 -10 MHz linear transducer using direct contact and water bath techniques. Ultrasonographically, parenchyma, lobes, major duct, gland cistern, teat cistern, teat/streak canal were visualized. Measurement of the structures i.e. teat end width (TEW), teat canal length (TCL), teat cistern width (TCW) and teat wall thickness (TWT) were also recorded using in build caliper in USG machine. The mean ± SE measurements of TEW, TCL, TCW and TWT in lactating goats were 1.34±0.07, 1.74±0.13, 0.38±0.04 and 0.55±0.02 cms, respectively, whereas the corresponding mean ± SE values in non lactating goats were 1.02±0.03, 1.06±0.06, 0.24±0.01 and 0.46±0.02 cms.


Goat Teat Ultrasonography.


  1. Braun, U. and Euter, U. Z. (1997). In: Braun, U. (ed.). Atlas und Lehrbuch der ltraschalldiagnostik beim Rrind. 1st Edn., Berlin: Parey. pp 163–175.
  2. Cartee, R. E.; Ibrahim, A. K. and Macleary, D. (1986). B mode ultrasonography of bovine udder and teat. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 188: 1284-1287.
  3. Franz, S.; Baumgartner, W.; Hofmann-Parisot, M.; Windischybauer, G.; Suchy, A. and Bauder, B. (2001). Ultrasonography of the teat canal in cows and sheep. Vet. Rec., 149: 109-112.
  4. Gungor, O.; Pancarci, S. M. and Kasrabacak, A. (2005). Examination of equine udder and teat by B- mode ultrasonography. Kafkas. Universitesi. Fakultesi. Dergisi., 11(2): 107-111.
  5. Hospes, R. and Seeh, C. (1999). Sonographie und Endoskopie an der Zzitze des Rindes,1st Edn. Stuttgart, Germany. pp 27–48.
  6. Nak, D.; Nak, Y. and Keskin, A. (2005). Diagnosis of various teat lesion in dairy cows by ultrasonography. Indian Vet. J., 82(11): 1163-1166.
  7. Neijenhuis, F.; Klungel, G. H. and Hogeveen, H. (2001). Recovery of cow teats after milking as determined by ultrasonographic scanning. J. Dairy Sci., 84: 2599–2606.
  8. Ruberte, J.; Carretero, A.; Fernandez, M.; Navarro, M.; Caja, G.; Kircher, F. and Such, X. (1994). Ultrasound mammography in the lactating ewe and its correspondence to anatomical section. Small Ruminant Res., 13: 199-204.
  9. Saleh, M. S.; Mobarak, A. M. and Fouad, S. M. (1971). Radiological, anatomical and histological studies of the mammary gland of the one-humped camel (Camelus dromedaries). Zentralbl Vet. Med. A. 18: 347-352.
  10. Seeh, C.; Hospes, R. and Bostedt, H. (1996). Use of visual methods sonography/ endoscopy for the diagnosis of a webbed teat in cattle—a case report. Tierärztl Prax., 24: 438–442.
  11. Swill, S.; Würgau, S. T. and Fraunholz, J. (2004). Sonographische Befunde an der papilla mammae des Rindes. Dtsch Tierärztl Wochenschr., 97: 403–406.

Global Footprints