Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.5 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 48 issue 5 (october 2014) : 509-512


Gouri Jaiswal1, Sanjeev Kumar*, Yogendra Prasad2
1Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Central Avian Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly– 243 122, India
Cite article:- Jaiswal1 Gouri, Kumar* Sanjeev, Prasad2 Yogendra (2024). IMMUNOCOMPETENCE TRAITS AND THEIR INHERITANCE PATTERN IN KADAKNATH NATIVE CHICKEN. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 48(5): 509-512. doi: 10.5958/0976-0555.2014.00021.1.
Economics of poultry production can be improved by reducing input on health care (major investment) and increasing production. It necessitates evaluation and exploitation of immunocompetence traits of germplasm. An investigation was carried out on 174 Kadaknath native chickens, maintained at this institute to evaluate immunocompetence profile. Data on three traits viz., antibody response to sheep erythrocytes and serum levels of lysozyme and IgG, were analyzed by least squares analysis of variance taking sire as random and sex as fixed effects. Sire had significant effect on lysozyme (Pe achieved by selection for combination of different facets of host’s immune systems.
  1. Bootwala, S. (2005) Poultry and the population on the Asian subcontinent. World Poultry, 21 (4): 10-12.
  2. Gavora, J.S. (1993) In: Manipulation of the Avian Genome (ed. by Etches R.J. and Varrinder, Gibbins A.M.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp.231-241.
  3. Gross, W. B., Domermuth, C. H., and Siegel, P. B., (1988). Genetic and environmental effects on the response of chickens to avian adenovirus group II infection. Avian Pathology, 17: 767-774.
  4. Harvey, W.R. (1990). Users guide for LSML MW. Ohio 43320, USA.
  5. Kumar, R. (2006). Immunocompetence status and DNA polymorphism in immune response genes in Aseel Native chicken. M.V.Sc. Thesis, IVRI, Izatnagar, India.
  6. Kundu, A.M., Singh, D.P., Mahapatra, S.C., Dash, B.B., Moudgal, R.P. and Bisht, G.S. (1999). Antibody response to sheep erythrocytes in Indian vis-à-vis imported breeds of chicken. Br. Poult. Sci., 40: 40-43.
  7. Lamont, S.J. (1998). Impact of genetics on disease resistance. Poult. Sci., 77: 1111-1118.
  8. Lamont, S.J. and Dietert, R.R. (1990). In: Poultry Breeding and Genetics (ed. by R.D. Crawford). Elsevier Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Chap. 22, pp. 497-541
  9. Lie, Q., Solbu, H. and Syed, M. (1986). A genetic association between bovine lysozyme and colostrum lysozyme levels. Anim. Genet., 17: 39-45.
  10. Mancini, G., Carbonara, A.O., and Heremans, J.F. (1965). Immunochemical quantitation of antigens by single radial immunodiffusion. Immunochemistry, 2: 235-254.
  11. Parmentier, H.K., Schrama, J.W., Meijer, F. and Nieuwland, M.G.B. (1993). Cutaneous hypersensitivity responses in chicken divergently selected for antibody responses to sheep red blood cells. Poult. Sci., 72: 1679-1692.Saxena, V.K., Singh, H., Pal, S.K. and Kumar, S. (1997). Genetic studies on primary response to sheep erythrocytes in guinea fowl. Br. Poult. Sci., 38: 156-158.
  12. Singh, A.P. (2005). Interleukin receptor genes polymorphism in specialized layer chicken lines. M.V.Sc. Thesis, IVRI, Izatnagar, India.
  13. Singh, P., Kumar, S., Singh, H.N., Singh, D.P., Jaiswal, G., and Meena, S.R. (2009). Genetics of immunocompetence traits in Kadaknath native chicken. Indian J. of Poult. Sci., 44 (2): 173-176.
  14. Sivaraman, G.K., Kumar, S., Saxena, V.K., Singh, N.S., Shivakumar, B.M. and Muthukumar, S.P. (2003) Genetic studies of immunocompetence and economic traits in a synthetic dam line of broiler chickens. Proceeding of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium, 15: 79-82.
  15. Sivaraman, G. K. (2004) Molecular genetics evaluation of broiler chicken lines divergently selected for immunocompetence index. Ph.D. Thesis, IVRI, Izatnagar, India.
  16. Sivaraman, G.K., Kumar, S., Saxena, V.K., Singh, N.S., Shivakumar, B.M. and Muthukumar, S.P. (2005). Genetics of Immunocompetent traits in a Synthetic Broiler Dam Line. Br. Poult. Sci., 46 (2): 169-174.
  17. van der Zijpp, A. J. (1983). The effect of genetic origin, source of antigen, and dose of antigen on the immune response of cockerels. Poult. Sci. 62:205–211.
  18. Van der Zijpp, A.J. and Leenstra, K.R. (1980). Genetic analysis of the humoral immune response of white leghorn chicks. Poult. Sci. 59: 1363-69.
  19. Zakarias, B., Ter Huurne, A.A.H.M., Landman, W.J.M., rebel, J.M.J., Pol, J.M.A. and Gruys, E. (2002). Immunological basis of differences if disease resistance in the chicken. Vet. Res., 33: 109-125.

Editorial Board

View all (0)