Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorM. R. Saseendranath

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.40

  • SJR 0.233, CiteScore: 0.606

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 48 issue 3 (june 2014) : 281-285

EFFECT OF BIOVET ON PERFORMANCE, EGG QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS AND HATCHABILITY IN QUAIL BREEDERS

B.K. Swain*, P.K. Naik, E.B. Chakurkar, N.P. Singh
1ICAR Research Complex for Goa, Ela, Old Goa-403 402, India
Cite article:- Swain* B.K., Naik P.K., Chakurkar E.B., Singh N.P. (2025). EFFECT OF BIOVET ON PERFORMANCE, EGG QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS AND HATCHABILITY IN QUAIL BREEDERS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 48(3): 281-285. doi: 10.5958/j.0976-0555.48.3.059.

ABSTRACT

The effect of Biovet (combination of prebiotic and  probiotic) on the egg production, egg weight, egg quality characteristics and hatchability was studied in Japanese quail breeders for a period of 8 weeks (7-15 weeks). Control diet was formulated to meet the standard nutrient requirement of breeding quails. Biovet was supplied in drinking water (DW) @ 0, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 g per litre to 4 groups of breeding quails and each group further replicated to 4 sub-groups with 10 females and 5 males. Egg production, egg weight and feed conversion ratio (FCR) (Kg feed/Kg egg mass) were similar for all groups. The egg shell %, shell thickness, fertility and hatchability were significantly (P

REFERENCES

  1. Abdel-Azeem, F.A., Nematallah, G.M. and Ibrahim Faten, A.A. (2005). Effect of dietary protein level with some natural biological feed additives supplementation on productive and physiological performance of Japanese quail. Egypt Poult. Sci., 25(2):497-525.
  2. AOAC. (1990). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn.,Washington, USA.
  3. Arun, K.P., Savaram, S.R.R., Manteta, V.L.N.R. and Sita, S.S.(2007). Effect of probiotic(Lactobacillus sporogenes) feeding on egg production and quality, yolk cholesterol and humoral immune response of White Leghorn layer breeders. J. Sci. Food Agric., 88 (1): 43-47.
  4. Ayassan, T., Ozcan, B.D., Baylan, M. and Canogullari, S.(2006). The effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic Protexin on Egg Yield Parameters of Japanese Quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Int. J. Poult. Sci., 5(8):776-779.
  5. Cepuliene, R., Gudaviciute, D., Semaska, V., Bobiniene, R., Kepaliene, I., Venicius, D. and Sirvydis, V. (2010). Effect of the yeast culture feed additive on productivity and egg quality of laying quails. Vet Med Zootech, 52:13-20.
  6. Duncan, B. D. (1955). New multiple r ange and multiple F test. Biometrics, 11: 1-42.
  7. FAO/WHO.(2002). Evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO expert consultation. http:www.fao.org/es/ESN/food/food and food probio_en.stm.
  8. Garcia, L.H. (2003). In Symposium: Probiotics and prebiotics. Biotechnol. Applic.,20:189-194.
  9. Gardiner, G. E., Casey, P.G., Casey, G.,Lynch, P.B., Lawlor, P.G., Hill, C., Fitzgerald, G.F., Stanton, C. and Ross, R.P. (2004). Relative ability of orally administered Lactobacillus murinus to predominate and persist in the porcine gastrointestinal tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 70: 1895-1906.
  10. Gibson, G.R. (2004). From probiotics to prebiotics and a healthy digestive system. J. Food Sci., 69:141-143.
  11. Guclu, B.K. (2011). Effect of probiotic and prebiotic (mannanoligosaccharide) supplementation on performance, egg quality and hatchability in quail breeders. Ankara Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg, 58:27-32.
  12. Hossanein, S.M. and Soliman, N.K. (2010). Effect of probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) adding to diets on intestinal microflora and performance of Hy-Line layers hens. J. American Sci., 6(1):159-169.
  13. Khan, S.H., Atif, M., Mukhtar, N., Rehman, A. and Fareed, G. (2011). Effects of supplementation of multi-enzyme and multi-species probiotic on production performance, egg quality, cholesterol level and immune system in laying hens. J. Appl. Anim. Res., 39(4):386-398.
  14. Panda, A. K., Reddy, M.R., RamaRao,S.V. and Praharaj, N.K.(2003). Production performance, serum/yolk cholesterol and immune competence of white leghorn layers as influenced by dietary supplementation with probiotic. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 35:85-94.Patterson, J.A. and Burkholder, K. M. (2003). Application of probiotic and prebiotics in poultry production. Poult. Sci., 82:627-631.
  15. Pelicano, E.R.L., Souza, P.A., Souza, H.B.A., Leonel, F.R., Zeola, N.M.B.L. and Boiago, M.M. (2004). Productive traits of broiler chickens fed diets containing different growth promoters. Brazilian J. Poult. Sci., 6:177-182.
  16. Shane, S. M.(2001). Mannan oligosaccharides in poultry nutrition: mechanism and benefits. In :Science and Technology in the Feed Industry, Lyons T.P. and Jacques K.A. (eds) Proceeding of Alltech’s 17th Annual Symposium. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, NG 110AX, United Kingdom, pp65-77.
  17. Shashidhara, R.G. and Devegowda, G. (2003). Effect of dietary mannan oligosaccharide on broiler breeder production traits and immunity. Poult. Sci., 82:1319-1325.
  18. Scedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. (1968). Statistical Methods. 6th edn. Oxford and IBH Publishing, Calcutta.
  19. Timmerman, H.M., Koning, C.J.M., Mulder, L., Rombouts, F.M. and Beynen, A.C. (2004).
  20. Monostrain, multistrain and multispecies probiotics-a comparison of functionality and efficacy. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 96:219-233.
  21. Zwell, H.S.(2007). Effect of Yea-Saac and garlic powder (Allium sativum) on the production, egg quality, cholesterol of plasma and egg yolk of laying Japanese quail hens. XVIII European Symposium on the quality of poultry meat and XII European Symposium on the Quality of Egg Products, Prague, pp 345-346.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)