Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 48 issue 3 (june 2014) : 214-216

GENETIC ANALYSIS OF GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF SAHIWAL COWS

R.S. Gandhi, Amit Kumar*
1National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132 001, India
Cite article:- Gandhi R.S., Kumar* Amit (2024). GENETIC ANALYSIS OF GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF SAHIWAL COWS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 48(3): 214-216. doi: 10.5958/j.0976-0555.48.3.045.
In the present investigation, genetic analysis for early growth traits of Sahiwal cows were performed using mixed linear model. The overall least squares means for body weights at birth (BW), 6 (W6), 12 (W12), 18 (W18), 24 (W24), 42(W30) months and weight at first service (WFS) were 20.59±0.27, 82.29±2.64, 136.98±3.26, 204.83±2.77, 252.27±3.24, 314.16±5.01 and 355.75±5.87 Kg, respectively. Effect of season of birth was non-significant on BW, W6 and W24 whereas season of birth significantly affected W12, W18 and WFS. The effect of period of calving of dams was significant on all growth traits under investigation except birth weight. Age at first calving of dams affected significantly all the growth traits of cows except birth weight. The estimates of heritability for BW, W6, W12, W18, W24, W30 and WFS were 0.117±0.18, 0.746±0.24, 0.587±0.23, 0.203±0.19, 0.230±0.20, 0.518±0.22 and 0.549±0.23, respectively.
  1. Bhat, P.N. and Singh R.N. (1978). Effect of genetic and non-genetic factors on weight and linear body measurements at birth in crosses of Hariana with Holstein- Friesian, Brown Swiss and Jersey. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 51: 102.
  2. Bourdon, R.M. (2000). The genetic model for quantitative traits. In:Understanding Animal Breeding. 2nd Edition. (Ed. Linsner K, Carnis M. Charles, E. Stewart, Jr.) Prentice-Hall Inc. P. 110-120.
  3. Harvey, W.R. (1990). User guide for LSMLMW and MIXMDL package. Mix Model Least Squares and Maximum Likelihood Computer Programme. PC-2 Version Mimeograph, Columbia, Ohio, USA.
  4. Holland, B.J.M., Mullaney, P.D. and Hopkins, I.R. (1977). Breed and environmental factors affecting birth weight in Victorian beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 17: 5-9.
  5. Khan, U.N., Dahlin, A., Zafar, A.H., Saleem, M., Chaudhry, M.A., Philipsson, J. (1999). Sahiwal cattle in Pakistan: genetic and environmental causes of variation in body weight and reproduction and their relationship to milk production. Anim. Sci., 68: 97-108.
  6. Mandal, A., Sachdeva, G.K. (1999). Genetic analysis of birth weight of calves in cattle. Indian J. of Anim. Sci. 69: 979-980.
  7. Patterson, D.J., Perry, R.C., Kiracofe, G.H., Bellows, R.A., Staigmiller, R.B. and Corah, LR. (1992). Management considerations in heifer development and puberty. J. Anim. Sci., 70: 4018-4035.
  8. Rabeya, T., Bhuiyan, A.K.F.H., Habib, M.A. and Hossain, M.S. (2009). Phenotypic and genetic parameters for growth traits in Red Chittagong Cattle of Bangladesh. J. Bangladesh Agril. Univ. 7: 265–271.
  9. Raheja, K.L. (1994). Comparative evaluation of Friesian-Sahiwal and Friesian Hariana half-breds at different military farms. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 64: 373-377.

Editorial Board

View all (0)