Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 55 issue 10 (october 2021) : 1141-1149

Establishment and Preliminary Application of Multiplex Fluorescent Quantitative PCR for Simultaneous Detection of BVDV, BRV and BCV

Liyun Chang1, Zhiyong Liu2, Yuelan Zhao1, Yan Li1, Jianhua Qin1,*
1College of Veterinary Medicine, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, Hebei, 071001, China.
2Tangshan Animal Disease Prevention and Control Center, Thangshan, Hebei, 064001, China.
Cite article:- Chang Liyun, Liu Zhiyong, Zhao Yuelan, Li Yan, Qin Jianhua (2021). Establishment and Preliminary Application of Multiplex Fluorescent Quantitative PCR for Simultaneous Detection of BVDV, BRV and BCV . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 55(10): 1141-1149. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-1402.
Background: In this study, we aimed to establish a multiplex fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for the identification and detection of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), bovine rotavirus (BRV) and bovine coronavirus (BCV).

Methods: Based on the highly conserved sequences of BVDV E2 gene, BRV VP6 gene and BCV N gene in GenBank, specific primers were designed to amplify the target gene fragments of each virus and the reaction conditions and system were optimized. Multiple fluorescence quantitative methods were established by fluorescence quantitative PCR.

Result: The minimum detection limits of plasmid standards for BVDV, BRV and BCV by multiplex fluorescence quantitative PCR were 1.19×10copies/μL, 3.89×10copies/μL and 3.74×10copies/μL, respectively. The lowest sensitivity of the established method was 100 times higher than that of conventional PCR and had high sensitivity. Furthermore, BVDV, BRV and BCV were amplified specifically, with no cross-reactivity with Escherichia coli (E. coli), Salmonella and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus (IBRV). The intra-and inter-group coefficients of variation were less than 1%, showing good assay repeatability. Using the established method and ordinary multiplex PCR to simultaneously detect 150 clinical diarrheal disease material samples, the coincidence rate of samples with mixed infection of the three viruses was 83.3%. The results showed that the multiplex fluorescent quantitative PCR detection method established in this study provides a rapid, sensitive and specific technique for clinical diagnosis and epidemiological monitoring of BVDV, BRV and BCV.
Calf diarrhea (CD) is one of the most common symptoms of digestive tract disease in calves. If newborn calves are diagnosed and treated as soon as possible, this condition often leads to a large number of deaths. CD has been reported to be an important factor responsible for calf deaths before weaning in the United States, South Korea (Hur et al., 2013) and Iran (Azizzadeh et al., 2013). In recent years, with the expansion of the scale of dairy farming in China, the incidence of CD has been increasing year by year, with serious impacts on the early growth and development of late calves as well as the stability of late production performance. The mortality rate has been reported to reach 90%, which seriously affects the expansion of dairy farming (Gomez et al., 2017; Ryu et al., 2020).
       
At present, BVDV, BRV and BCV are detected mainly using pathogenic, immunologic and molecular biological detection techniques (Zhuang et al., 2018). Real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction (FQ-PCR) is widely used as a detection method in the laboratory due to its advantages of operational simplicity and efficiency, high sensitivity and good repeatability (Letellier and Kerkhofs, 2003; Baxi et al., 2006). There are two kinds of real-time FQ-PCR: the fluorescent dye method and the TaqMan probe method. The fluorescent dye method is the most commonly used (Zhang et al., 2011) and allows the rapid detection of multiple genes or nucleic acid sequences within the same reaction tube. FQ-PCR overcomes the shortcomings of conventional PCR in terms of sensitivity, efficiency and pathogen content determination (Zhang et al., 2014). The FQ-PCR methods that are currently available for the diagnosis of BVDV, BRV and BCV detect only single or double infections and cannot detect three viruses simultaneously, which limits the popularity and application of this technique in the clinic.
Viral and bacterial strains
 
BVDV, BRV, BCV, E. coli, Salmonella and IBRV were all preserved in the Parasite Laboratory of the College of Veterinary Medicine, Hebei Agricultural University (Baoding, Hebei, China). BVDV and IBRV were expanded in MDBK cells, BRV was expanded in MA-104 cells and BRV was expanded in HCT-8 cells. BVDV, BRV and BCV were used as standard viruses for the establishment of the multiplex PCR. The preserved E.coli and Salmonella strains were inoculated into Luria–Bertani (LB) liquid medium and cultured in a shaking incubator (220 r / min) at 37oC for 12-16 h.
 
Collection of clinical samples
 
In June 2020, 150 samples of fresh diarrheal feces were collected from 0-30-day-old calf. Each fresh stool sample was placed into a sterile centrifuge tube containing 5 mL of PBS (pH 7.2), shaken for 1 min and centrifuged at 5,000 r/min for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and stored at -20oC for later use.
 
Primer design and synthesis
 
Based on sequences of the BVDV (MK170077), BRV (MNo47454) and BCV (MK903505) reference strains published in GenBank, three pairs of primers were designed for specific amplification of the BVDV E2, BRV VP6 and BCV (N) genes using DNAStar (DNAStar, Madison, WI, USA) and Primer 5.0 (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA, USA) software. The primers were synthesized by Changchun Kume Bioengineering Co. (China) and the sequences are shown in Table 1.
 

Table 1: PCR primer sequences.


 
Extraction of viral RNA and bacterial DNA
 
Viral RNA was extracted using a genomic RNA Extraction Kit (TaKaRaBio, Dalian, China) (magnetic bead method) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with an automatic nucleic acid extraction instrument. The extracted RNA was reverse-transcribed using a reverse transcription kit (TaKaRaBio, Dalian, China) and the cDNA product was stored at -20oC for later use.
 
Preparation of recombinant plasmid standards
 
The cDNA of BVDV, BRV and BCV were amplified by PCR using the designed specific primers. The primer concentration was diluted to 10 pmol/μL. 20-μL reaction system: 10 μL 2× ExTaq Master Mix, 7 μL dd H2O, 0.5 μL upstream and 0.5 μL downstream primers and 2 μL DNA template. The reaction conditions were as follows: 94oC for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 94oC for 30 s, 55oC for 30 s and 72oC for 30 s, with a final extension at 72oC for 7 min. Sterile deionized water was used as the negative control. The amplified PCR products were purified and ligated into the pUC57 vector for the transformation of DH5α competent E. coli cells. The cells were then plated on LB solid medium containing ampicillin and screened for positive clones, which were cultured and the recombinant plasmids were amplified by PCR. The PCR products were digested using restriction enzymes. The correct positive recombinant plasmid was identified by sequencing and its concentration was determined using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo, USA), The number of copies was calculated as follows:
 
Copy number = Plasmid concentration × 6.02×1023/(660 × total length of plasmid) as a standard.
 
Single FQ-PCR
 
Ten-fold serial dilutions of the three virus plasmid standards were prepared in triplicate at 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101 and 100 copies/μL for use as templates in single FQ-PCR. The amplification results were analyzed to generate the standard curves. The melting curves were analyzed to eliminate the interference of primer-dimers and nonspecific amplification. The 15-μL reaction system was as follows: 7.5 μL PerfectStartTM Green SuperMix, 0.5 μL upstream and 0.5 μL downstream primers, 2.0 μL template and 4.5 μL ddH2O. The reaction conditions were as follows: 95oC for 5 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95oC for 20 s, 56oC for 20 s and 72oC for 20 s; sterile water was used as the negative control.
 
Optimization of reaction conditions for multiplex FQ-PCR
 
The multiple FQ-PCR method was optimized using a gradient of diluted standards (107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101 and 100 copies/μL) as templates, with various annealing temperature (52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57 and 58oC) and the primer concentration was diluted to 10 pmol/μL,final primer concentrations (0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7 and 0.8 μL). The reaction conditions resulting in a Ct value ≤45 cycles were defined as optimal for this FQ-PCR method.
 
Sensitivity test
 
Ten-fold serial dilutions of the three virus plasmid standards were prepared in triplicate at 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101 and 100 copies/μL for use as templates. The optimized reaction conditions were used for multiplex FQ-PCR detection to determine the sensitivity. Ordinary multiplex PCR detection was conducted in parallel for comparison of the results of the two methods.
 
Specificity test
 
The extracted genomic DNA of E.coli, Salmonella and IBRV was used as a template; a pool of BVDV, BRV and BCV genomic DNA was used as positive control and sterile water was used as a negative control. The multiplex fluorescent quantitative PCR detection method was employed in this study using the optimized conditions. The specificity of the method was detected by fluorescent multiplex FQ-PCR.
 
Repeatability test
 
Ten-fold serial dilutions of the three virus plasmid standards were prepared at 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101 and 100 copies/μL and mixed in equal proportions. Plasmid mixtures at final concentrations of 106, 105 and 104 copies/μL were tested; sterile water was used as the negative control. The established FQ-PCR method was repeated three times to evaluate intra-group repeatability. Inter-group repeatability was evaluated using the same three standard dilutions (106, 105 and 104 copies/μL) prepared on separate occasions and the test results were analyzed statistically.
 
Clinical sample testing
 
According to the comparison between the established multiplex fluorescent quantitative PCR method and the conventional multiplex PCR method, BVDV, BRV and BCV were detected simultaneously in 150 clinical samples. The positive rate, sensitivity, specificity and coincidence rate of the two methods were compared.
The calculation formula is: 
 




Preparation of recombinant plasmid standard
 
Specific primers were designed for amplification of BVDV, BRV and BCV target fragments (280 bp, 151 bp and 111 bp, respectively) using the extracted cDNA as a template. As shown in Fig 1, the amplified target fragments were consistent with the expected results. The fragments were cloned into pUC57 vector and sequencing showed that the fragments were identical to those in the GenBank database. The concentrations of the recombinant plasmids containing the BVDV, BRV and BCV fragments were 0.05 ng/μL, 1.67 ng/μL and 1.60 ng/μL, respectively, corresponding to recombinant plasmid copy numbers of 1.19×1010 copies/μL, 3.89×1010 copies/μL, 3.74×1010 copies/μL.
 

Fig 1: PCR amplification of recombinant plasmid.


 
Establishment of standard curves
 
The BVDV recombinant plasmid standard was detected in the range of 107 to 102 copies/μL and the BRV and BCV recombinant plasmid standards were detected in the range of 107 to 101 copies/μL. Automatic analysis software was used to construct FQ-PCR standard curves by plotting the logarithm of the copy number as the ordinate and the cycle threshold (Ct) value as the abscissa. As shown in Fig 2 (a-c), the amplification efficiency exceeded 90% for the BVDV standards in the range of 107-102 copies/μL and the BRV and BCV standards in the range of 107-101 copies/μL and the correlation coefficient R2 was greater than 0.99, indicating a good linear relationship between the starting copy number of the templates and the Ct value of the various standards.
 

Fig 2: FQ-PCR standard curves.


       
The linear equation of the copy number (x) and Ct value (y) was obtained as follows:

BVDV, y = -3.911x + 40.21, R2 = 0.995.

BRV, y = -3.657x + 37.64, R2 = 0.992.

BCV, y = -3.647x + 37.73, R2 = 0.997.
 
Determination of reaction conditions for multiplex FQ-PCR
 
The conditions for FQ-PCR detection of BVDV, BRV and BCV were optimized. The optimal reaction system was identified as 25 μL containing 12.5 μL PerfectStartTM Green SuperMix, 0.5 μL upstream and 0.5 μL downstream primers of BVDV00.5 μL upstream and 0.5 μL downstream primers of BRV00.5 μL upstream and 0.5 μL downstream primers of BCV, 2.0 μL template of BVDV0BRV0BCV cDNA, respectively and 3.5 μL ddH2O. The optimal reaction conditions were identified as 95oC for 5 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95oC for 20 s, 55oC for 20 s and 72oC for 20 s; sterile water was used as the negative control. In diagnostic real-time PCR assays, it was customary to regard values results between Ct 35 and 45 as equivocal, while those above Ct 45 were regarded as negative (Zhao et al., 2018).
 
Melting curve analysis
 
As shown in Fig 3 (a-c), a single peak was observed at each dilution for each of the melting curves for BVDV, BRV and BCV, which excluded primer-dimer interference. The melting temperatures for the BVDV E2, BRV VP6 and BCV N genes were approximately 85oC, 83oC and 84oC, respectively. Cao (2018) reported that BRV amplified a single peak when the dissolution temperature was 77oC and BCV amplified a single peak when the dissolution temperature was 79oC, which was lower than that in this study. Jiang H H(2020) reported that BVDV amplified a single peak when the dissolution temperature was 84oC, It is similar to the results of this study.

Fig 3: Melting curves.


 
Sensitivity analysis of multiplex FQ-PCR
 
The sensitivity of the established multiplex FQ-PCR for the detection of BVDV, BRV and BCV was evaluated using 10-fold serial dilutions (107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101 and 100 copies/μL) of the recombinant plasmid standards analyzed under the established reaction conditions. For the multiplex FQ-PCR, the minimum detection limit for BVDV was 102 copies/μL and 101 copies/μL for both BRV and BCV (Fig 4a-c). For the conventional multiplex PCR, the detection limit for BVDV was 104 copies/μL and 103 copies/μL for BRV and BCV (Fig 5). Thus, the sensitivity of the established multiplex FQ-PCR method was much greater than that of the conventional multiplex PCR. It is similar to the real-time fluorescence quantitative detection method recommended by Cao (2018)and Ren (2019).
 

Fig 4: Sensitivity analysis of the established multiplex FQ-PCR.


 

Fig 5: Conventional multiplex PCR sensitivity assay.


 
Specificity analysis of multiplex FQ-PCR
 
The specificity of the established FQ-PCR was evaluated using BVDV, BRV and BCV plasmid standards as positive controls and sterile water was used as the negative control. Genomic DNAs from E. coli, Salmonella and IBRV were used as templates and the FQ-PCR was performed under the established reaction conditions. As shown in Fig 6, the specific amplification curves of BVDV, BRV and BCV were detected respectively, while no fluorescence signal was detected in the negative control samples containing genomic DNA from E. coli, Salmonella, IBRV and sterile water as templates. These findings indicated that the established multiplex FQ-PCR method can be used to detect BVDV, BRV and BCV with high specificity.
 

Fig 6: Specific detection using the multiplex fluorescent quantitative PCR method.


 
Repeatability analysis of the multiplex FQ-PCR
 
Three different concentrations of the BVDV, BRV and BCV recombinant plasmid standards were selected as templates to test the repeatability of the established multiplex FQ-PCR. As shown in Table 2, the intra-and inter-group coefficients of variation were less than 1%, indicating that the multiple FQ-PCR established in this study can be used to detect BVDV, BRV and BCV with good repeatability.
 

Table 2: Repeatability results of multiplex fluorescent quantitative PCR.


 
Clinical sample testing
 
The established multiplex FQ-PCR and conventional multiplex PCR methods were compared for the analysis of 150 clinical fecal samples (Fig 7, Fig 8). As shown in Table 3, the mixed infection of the three viruses was positively detected in 12% (18/150) of samples by the multiplex FQ-PCR and 10.0% (15/150) of samples by the conventional multiplex PCR. The coincidence rate of the two methods was 83.3%. Comparison of the two detection methods revealed a sensitivity of 93.8%, a specificity of 81.8% and a total coincidence rate of 94.7%. Three additional mixed infection positive samples were detected by multiplex fluorescence quantitative PCR, indicating that the detection method established in this study is sensitive and can be applied to clinical detection. These results showed that the multiplex FQ-PCR method established in this study was more sensitive than the conventional multiplex PCR and is suitable for clinical detection.
 

Fig 7: Melting curves of mixed infections in clinical diarrhea samples detected by multiplex FQ-PCR.


 

Table 3: Detection of clinical diarrhea samples.

In this study, this method was shown to amplify BVDV, BRV and BCV specifically, without cross-reaction with E.coliSalmonella and IBRV, thus confirming the high level of specificity of the technique. The minimum detection limits of the BVDV, BRV and BCV plasmid standards by multiplex fluorescence quantitative PCR were 1.19×102 copies/μL, 3.89´101 copies/μL and 3.74×101 copies/μL, respectively and the sensitivity was 100 times higher than that of conventional PCR, with good assay stability. The intra- and inter-group coefficients of variation were both less than 1%, demonstrating the good repeatability of the assay. The coincidence rate of the two methods for the detection of samples with mixed infections was 83.3%. Thus, the method established in this study facilitates effective detection for early diagnosis and epidemiological investigation of CD caused by BVDV, BRV and BCV with high specificity and sensitivity.
This research was supported by the Research and demonstration of key technologies for ecological dairy farming and disease prevention and control, Tangshan City’s 2020 Science and Technology Research and Development Plan Project (20150203C). The Dairy cow innovation team construction of Hebei modern agricultural industry technology system prevention and control of cow disease (HBCT2018120205). Key R&D project in Hebei Province Comprehensive prevention and treatment technology for multi-pathogenic infectious diarrhea of calves in dairy farms (20326603D).

  1. Azizzadeh, M., Shooroki, H.F., Kamalabadi, A.S., Stevenson, M.A. (2012). Factors affecting calf mortality in Iranian Holstein dairy herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine.104: 335-340.

  2. Baxi, M., McRae, D., Baxi, S., Greiser-Wilke, I., Vilcek, S., Amoako, K., Deregt, D., (2006). A one-step multiplex real-time RT- PCR for detection and typing of bovine viral diarrhea viruses. Veterinary Microbiology. 116: 37-44.

  3. Cao, Y. (2018). Establishment and application of BRV and BCV SYBR Green I RT qPCR detection method. Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University.

  4. Gomez, D.E., Arroyo, L.G., Poljak, Z., Viel, L., Weese, J.S. (2017). Detection of Bovine Coronavirus in Healthy and Diarrheic Dairy Calves. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 31: 1884-1891.

  5. Hur, T., Jung, Y.-H., Choe, C.-Y., Cho, Y.-I., Kang, S.-J., Lee, H.-J., Ki, K.-S., Baek, K.-S., Suh, G.-H. (2013). The dairy calf mortality: The causes of calf death during ten years at a large dairy farm in Korea. Korean Journal of Veterinary Research. 53: 103-108.

  6. Jiang, H.H., Hou, P.L., He, H.B., Wang, H.M. (2020). Detection of bovine viral diarrhea virus genotype 1 in aerosol by a real time RT-PCR assay. BMC Veterinary Research. 16: 1-9.

  7. Letellier, C., Kerkhofs, P. (2003). Real-time PCR for simultaneous detection and genotyping of bovine viral diarrhea virus. Journal of Virological Methods.114: 21-27.

  8. Ren, Y.C., Zhu, T., Chu, H.M., Cheng, K.H., Xie, X.L., Zhang, L., Sun, Y.Y., Yang, H.J. (2019). Establishment and applicaton of SYBY Green I quantitative real time PCR for detection of BVDV. Shandong Agricultural Sciences. 51: 106-110.

  9. Ryu, J.-H., Shin, S.-U., Choi, K.-S. (2020). Molecular surveillance of viral pathogens associated with diarrhea in pre-weaned Korean native calves. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 52: 1811-1820.

  10. Zhang, N., Liu, Z., Han, Q., Qiu, J., Chen, J., Zhang, G., Li, Z., Lou, S., Li, N. (2011). Development of one-step SYBR Green real-time RT-PCR for quantifying bovine viral diarrhea virus type-1 and its comparison with conventional RT-PCR. Virology Journal. 8: 374.

  11. Zhang, S.-Q., Tan, B., Li, P., Wang, F.-X., Guo, L., Yang, Y., Sun, N., Zhu, H.-W., Wen, Y.-J., Cheng, S.-P. (2014). Comparison of conventional RT-PCR, reverse-transcription loop- mediated isothermal amplification and SYBR green I- based real-time RT-PCR in the rapid detection of bovine viral diarrhea virus nucleotide in contaminated commercial bovine sera batches. Journal of Virological Methods. 207: 204-209.

  12. Zhuang, X.T., Bai, J., Zhang, Z.C. (2018). Application and development of new molecular diagnosis technology in animal disease detection. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science. 39: 108-112.

  13. Zhao, G., Hou, P., Huan, Y., He, C., Wang, H., He, H. (2018). Development of a recombinase polymerase amplification combined with a lateral flow dipstick assay for rapid detection of the mycoplasma bovis. BMC Veterinary Research. 14: 412.

Editorial Board

View all (0)