Sample characteristics
Descriptive statistics for the fibre trait are reported in Table 1. The Tuis alpacas analyzed in this study have lower FW (1.54 kg) compared with similar studies reported by other authors using adult animals (2.16 kg,
Wuliji et al., 2000). It is important to note that this study did not directly compare the results of young animals with those in adult alpaca animals. However, the results obtained in this study might be associated with the different physiology and nutrient expected between young and adult alpaca animals. In particular, this can be true in relation to body growth and less available nutrients for fiber production compared with adult animals (
National Research Council, 2007). Similarly, to FW, MFD showed a similar trend. This parameter showed low values if they are compared with those reported by other authors using adult animals (28 µm,
Wuliji et al., 2000) and according to the last classification of fibers is within the “Royal Alpaca” category
(Morante et al., 2009). Overall, all the alpaca fibre traits evaluated showed a wide range in composition with coefficient of variation (CV) higher than 9% (Table 1), where the widest range was observed for FW and CVMFD.
Fixed effects on fibre traits
Table 2 shows the analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the fixed effects on fibre traits. Statistically significant effects were observed for FW, MFD and CVMFD at the level of second-order interactions for the factors of year of birth, sex and color (P<0.01).
The interaction between year of birth × sex was statistically significant for FW (
P<0.01), indicating that the effect of year of birth on FW was different for each sex of the animals (Table 3). The female animals had higher FW than the male animals harvested in 2012 and 2013 (2.0 vs. 1.8 kg and 1.6 vs 1.4 kg, respectively). However, for animals harvested in 2015, the FW was higher in the male animals (1.7 vs 1.2 kg; Table 3). This might be explained by the fact that male animals tend to be heavier than female animals, thus providing more surface area of their skin for production of wool fibre. This is in agreement with results reported by other authors
(Gupta et al., 2015). Tomar et al., (2000), reported similar findings for the effect of sex of animals in Merino sheep. For all other years, FW was similar (
P<0.05) between males and females. The results from this study are similar to those reported by
Wuliji et al., (2000) in alpacas and
Ahmad et al., (2010) and
Gupta et al., (2015) in sheep. The apparent annual average variation in the FW was 30% per year, however, when FW was compared as function of sex, the variation was 26%. Differences in FW in different year of birth could be attributed to the dietary differences related to environmental factors (
e.g., rainfall variation) affecting availability of pastures over the year.
McGregor (2002) found in alpacas Huacaya a similar reduction of fiber performance by poor nutrition, with a loss of 0.95 kg of FW. Similar results were also reported in earlier studies in sheep by other authors
(Kumar et al., 2006; Gupta et al., 2015). McGregor and Howse (2018), reported that in Angora goats from Australia the first FW is affected by birth parity and sex of progeny, but not by subsequent fleeces. Genetic differences among years of birth may also be present in this population
(Gowane et al., 2016).
A statistically significant effect was observed for the year of birth × color interaction (
P<0.01) for both MFD and CVMFD (Table 4). The alpacas born in 2018 had the lowest fibre diameter, while both white and brown alpacas had similar fibre diameter (18.0 and 18.2 µm, respectively). The highest fibre diameter was observed in white and brown alpacas born in 2005, 2007 and 2012. Nevertheless, lower values were observed between 2013 and 2018. These results might indicate the efficiency of the breeding program implemented by the CEDAT-DESCO Alpaca Development Center (
Harizi and Abidi, 2015).
Cruz et al., (2017) indicated that the relevant factors that influence fibre performance are year, color and age of animal. These authors reported that dark coat animals were 3.09 µm coarser than white ones in Huacaya breed and 5.93 µm more than in Suri.
Montes et al., (2013) reported values of 21.65±0.36 µm for tuis alpacas of 1.5-year old. However, in the samples measured from the middle of an animal’s side, some studies have reported higher average values for MFD,
e.g. 27.5±4.6 µm (
Aylan-Parker and McGregor, 2002).
The CVMFD is considered a more important index of variability as it accounts for the mean as well as the standard deviation of the alpaca fibre since it affects the processing performance
(Badr et al., 2006; Montes et al., 2013). Moreover, this index shows a large dispersion of the wool diameter which confirms that the standard uniformity of the wool goes from average to poor uniformity (
Harizi and Abidi, 2015). The magnitude of this index depends upon the location on the animal’s body (
Aylan-Parker and McGregor, 2002). In the present study, CVMFD showed great variability at the beginning (from 2005 to 2012) of the establishment of the herd.
However, these values tend to stabilize in recent years (from 2013 to 2018) for both white and brown colors alpacas. This trend could be due to the efficient genetic improvement program implemented by CEDAT-DESCO. These values are in agreement with those reported by other authors. In the samples measured from the middle of an animal’s side,
Aylan-Parker and McGregor, (2002) reported higher average values for CVMFD of 24.3±4.0%, while
Montes et al., (2013) reported CV < 20% for fibre diameter of nearly 35% of fleeces and greater than 25% for 13% of fleeces. Low values reported in this study for MFD and CVMFD (16.9±1.1 µm and 19.9±1.8%, respectively) indicated that the quality of fibre produced by alpacas from CEDAT- DESCO is of best quality. Results from this study highlighted the efficiency of the program implemented by CEDAT-DESCO, that consequently will contribute with improve the incomes of smallholders when payment is based on fibre quality instead of FW.
Correlation between fibre traits
Pearson’s correlation coefficients obtained between FW and MFD and among fibre traits are shown in Table 5. The FW and MFD, as well as CVMFD and MFD had positive significant correlations (0.24 and 0.11, respectively). However, the correlation between FW and CVMFD were not statistically significant (0.08). The positive phenotypic correlation obtained in this study between FW and MFD are greater (0.18) than those reported by
Wuliji et al., (2000), but in agreement with the results (0.22) reported by
Wuliji et al., (2019). These results indicated that most of the changes or variation in MFD and FW might be occurred between the first and second shearing time (
Wuliji, 2000). These results also suggested that selection towards an increase in MFD might contribute to an increase in FW and CVMFD. However, FW and CVMFD were not correlated.