Loading...

A Study on the Effect of Altitude on Shell Thickness in Goose Eggs

DOI: 10.18805/IJAR.B-1313    | Article Id: B-1313 | Page : 1116-1120
Citation :- A Study on the Effect of Altitude on Shell Thickness in Goose Eggs.Indian Journal of Animal Research.2021.(55):1116-1120
Osman Karabulut okarabulut02@gmail.com
Address : Department of Biometrics, Veterinary Faculty, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Turkey.
Submitted Date : 13-08-2020
Accepted Date : 26-11-2020

Abstract

Backround: Egg shell plays role in the respiration, regulation of humidity, protection against diseases and integrity of egg. Therefore thickness of egg shell is an important feature. Many factors contribute to the formation of the shell thickness. The effect of altitude is still the subject of research.
Methods: 103 eggs were randomly collected from locations at 915 m, 920 m, 931 m, 935 m, 939 m, 960 m, 968 m, 995 m, 1150 m and 1.350 m altitudes laid out between Tuz Lake and Hasan Mountain and the thickness of the shell at the Blunt end, Equatorial part and Sharp end of the eggs were measured. 
Conclusion: The average thickness of the shell at the blunt end, equatorial part and sharp end were 0.54 mm, 0.58 mm and 0.60 mm respectively. These differences were statistically significant. When considering the effect of altitude on these three points and general egg thickness, the average values for general thickness varied from 0.53 mm to 0.60 mm, this was 0.51 mm - 0.56 mm for blunt end, 0.53 mm to 0.61 mm for equatorial part and 0.54 mm to 0.62 mm for sharp end. The differences according to altitude noted among equatorial part and sharp end were statistically significant. The correlations between the altitude with Blunt end, Equatorial part, Sharp end and General were insignificant. The results indicated that these altitudes had no obvious effect on eggshell thickness and that the difference detected in thickness could be caused by other factors that are ought to be determined by further studies.

Keywords

Altitude Egg Goose Shell thickness

References

  1. Ahmad, I., Alam, M.D.J., Haque, M.D.S., Mamdud, M.A.A. (2017). Proximate analysis and assessment the physical characteristics of different types of duck eggs in Bangladesh. J. of Engineering and Sci. Res. 1(2): 38-42, e-ISSN 2289-7127, DOI: 10.26666/rmp.jesr.2017.2.7.
  2. Balkan M., Biricik M. (2006). Pekin Ördeği (Anas platyrhynchos f. dom.) Yumurtalarında Kabuk Kalınlığı, Gozenek Sayısı ve Gözenek Yoğunluğundaki Bölgesel Farklılıklar. Süleyman Demirel Üniv., Fen Bil. Enst. Derg. 10(2): 193-196.
  3. Bayram, İ., Çetingül, İ.S., Yardlİmclİ, M., Şahin, E.H., Akkaya, A.B., Uyarlar, C. (2008). Effects of poppy seed oil supplementation in diets on egg production, egg quality and some blood parameters in laying hens. Kocatepe Vet. J. 1: 37-41.
  4. Bingöl, S.A., Deprem, T., Karadağ-Sarı, E. (2016). Comparison between goose (Anser anser) and chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) eggshells during embryonic development by scanning electron microscopy. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 22(6): 937-943, 2016 DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2016.15668.
  5. Black, C.P., Snyder, G.K. (1980). Oxygen transport in the avian egg at high altitude. Amer. Zool. 20: 461-468.
  6. Carey, C. (1994). Structural and physiological differences between montane and lowland avian eggs and embryos. J. Biosci. 19(4): pp 429-440. © Printed in India.
  7. Carey, C., Leon-Velarde, F., Monge, C. (1990). Eggshell conductance and other physıcal characterıstıcs of avıan eggs laıd in the Peruvıan Ian Andes. The Condor. The Cooper Ornithological Society, Ox. Univ. Press. 92: 790-793.
  8. Carey, C. (1980). Adaptation of the avian egg to high altitude. American Zoologis. Ox. Univ Press. 20(2): 449-459.
  9. Erensayın, C. (1991). Kuluçka Sonuçlarını Etkileyen Faktörler. Bilimsel, Teknik, Pratik Tavukçuluk, 1, Sec. 10, Tokat. p. 269-350,
  10. Fiialovych, L., Kyryliv, I. (2016). Layıng performance, egg qualıty and hatchıng results in geese fed wıth dry apple pomaces. Acta Sci. Pol. Zootechnica. 15(4): 71-82.
  11. Harita, T.R. Aksaray Haritası. https://www.haritatr.com/aksaray-haritasi-s44, Access Date: 18/08/2019.
  12. IBM (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22.
  13. Karabulut, O., Ün, H., Çamkerten, İ., Garip, M., Bulut, G. (2017). Aksaray Yöresi Kazlarda Kuluçka Randımanı Üzerine Araştırmalar. J. of Bahri Dagdas Anim. Res. 6(1):13-22, ISSN: 2148-3213.
  14. Karadavut, S. (2009). Aksaray Bölgesi Yerüstü ve Yeraltı Su Kaynaklarının Potansiyeli Kalitesi ve Etkin Sulama Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. (Doktora Tezi). Namık Kemal Üniv. Fen Bil. Enst., Tekirdağ/Turkey.
  15. Kaya, I., Karademir, B., Uçar, O. (2004). The effects of diet supplemented with sodium bicarbonate upon blood pH, blood gases and eggshell quality in laying geese. Vet. Med. Czech. 49(6): 201-206.
  16. Knight, K. (2016). High altitude bar headed geese outperform Vancouver cousins. Journal of Experimental Biology. doi: 10.1242/jeb.144709.
  17. KOTO (2020). Fire ve Zayiat Oranları. Sec. I. http://koto.org.tr/dokumanlar/ee2e988c8ad2fa3455679da1978fa7f7.doc Access Date: 25/06/2020.
  18. Kopar, İ. (2008). Hasan Dağında (Aksaray, Niğde) Hala Önemini Koruyan Basit Su Yapıları, Sarnıçlar ve Kuyular. Doğu Coğrafya Derg. 13: 167-188. 
  19. Linden, J. (2013). Incubating Eggs at High Altitudes.https://thepoultryste.com/artcles/ncubatng-eggs-at-hgh-alttudes, Access Date: 27.06.2019
  20. Olgun, O., Yildiz, A.Ö., Cufadar, T. (2015). The effects of eggshell and oyster shell supplemental as Calcium sources on performance, eggshell quality and mineral excretion in laying hens. Indian J. Anim. Res. 49(2): 205-209, Print ISSN: 0367-6722/Online ISSN:0976-0555, DOI: 10.5958/0976-0555.2015.00056.4.
  21. Portugal, S.J., Maurer, G., Thomas, G.H., Hauber, M.E., Grim, Cassey, P. (2014). Nesting behaviour influences species-specific gas exchange across avian eggshells. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 217: 3326-3332, doi:10.1242/jeb.103291.
  22. Rahn, H., Carey, C., Balmas, K., Bhatia, B., Paganelli, C. (1977). Reduction of Pore Area of the Avian Eggshell as an Adaptation to Altitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci. of the USA. 74(7): 3095-3098.
  23. Roy, S., Mishra, S.C. (2010). Comparative studies on the effect of different antistress agents on the performance of broiler breeder hen during hot summer. Indian J. Anim. Res. 44(4): 285-288.
  24. Saatçi, M., Yardımcı, M., Kaya, İ., Poyraz, Ö. (2002). Kars İli Kazlarında Bazı Yumurta Özellikleri. Lalahan Hay. Araşt. Enst. Derg. 42(2): 37-45.
  25. Sotherland, P.R., Packard, G.C., Taigen, T.L., Boardman, T.J. (1980). An altitudinal cline in conductance of cliff swallow (Petrochelidon Pyr Rhonota) eggs to water vapor. Auk. 97: 177-185.
  26. Swain, B.K., Naik, P.K., Chakurkar, E.B. and Sin, N.P. (2014). Effect of biovet on performance, egg quality characteristics and hatchability in quail breeders. Indian J. Anim. Res. 48(3): 281-285, DOI: 10.5958/j.0976-0555.48.3.059.
  27. Tilki, M. and. İnal, Ş. (2004). Quality traits of goose eggs: 1. Effects of goose age and storage time of eggs. Arch. Geflügelk. ISSN 0003-9098. Verlag Eugen Ulmer GmbH and Co., Stuttgart. 68 (4): 182-186.
  28. TVK (2018). Tuz Lake Special Environmental Protection Area. https://tvk.csb.gov.tr/tuz-golu-i-400,Access Date: 22/07/2019.
  29. Veldsman, L.M., Kylin, H., Bronkhorst, P., Engelbrecht, I., Bouwman, H. (2019). A method to determine the combined effects of climate change (temperature and humidity) and eggshell thickness on water loss from bird eggs. Environmental Geochemistry and Health (IF 3.472), DOI: 10.1007/s10653-019-00274-x.
  30. Yamak, U.S., Sarica, M., Boz, M.A., Ucar, A. (2016). The effect of eggshell thickness on hatching traits of partridges. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. 18(spe):13-18, ISSN 1516-635X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2015-0039.
  31. Yayvan, M., Çelik, S., Ersoy, S. Aksaray İklimi ve Küresel Isınma. Su Enerji Sağlık Sempozyumu, 20-23 Ekim 2008, Aksaray.
  32. YerelNET. Aksaray Belediyeleri Coğrafi Bilgileri. Anasayfa/İller/Aksaray İli Giriş Sayfası,http://aksaray.yerelnet.org.tr/il_belediye_koordinat.php?iladi=AKSARAY, Access Date: 27/06/2019.
  33. Yildirim, A., Sekeroglu, A., Koç, H., Eleroglu, H., Duman, M., Tahtali, Y., Elmastas, M., Sen-Mutlu, M.I. (2018). Egg production and quality characteristics of laying hens fed dietssupplemented with dry caper (Capparis spinosa) leaf powder. Indian J. Anim. Res. 52(1): 72-7, DOI: 10.18805/ijar.B-556.
  34. Zhang, J., Peng, W., Tang, W., Wang, M. (2017). Experimental study on the geometrical and mechanical properties of goose eggshells. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Sci. 19: 455-464.
  35. Zia, W.M., Khalique, A., Naveed, S., Hussain, J. (2016). Egg quality, geometry and hatching traits of indigenous aseel as influenced byorganic and inorganic selenium supplementation. Indian J. Anim. Res. 51(5): 860-867. Print ISSN:0367-6722/Online ISSN:0976-0555,DOI:10.18805/ijar.9420.

Global Footprints