Semen collection and semen processing
Research period was spring 2017- summer 2018. The experiment was conducted in the Laboratory of Biology of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Veracruz, Veracruz city, Mexico. Thirty ejaculates from five mature boars were used. Semen sperm-rich fraction (80-120 ml) was collected by the gloved hand technique
(Bottini-Luzardo et al., 2012). After collection, the quality of the fresh semen samples was evaluated. Sperm concentration analysis was performed by counting cells in a Neubauer chamber as described by
Gutiérrez-Pérez et al., (2009). After counting, semen was diluted (1:1) using a commercial long-term boar semen diluent (Vitacem LD 40g/1L H
2O format, from Megapor
®, Spain) and finally storage for 24 h at 16°C until use.
Analysis of sperm motility and viability
Mass motility was evaluated by visual estimation of the percentage of spermatozoa showing progressive motility between 0 and 100% (
Maxwel and Evans, 1990). Samples exhibiting values ≥70% progressive motility were selected for the study (
Dziekońska and Strzezek, 2011). Viability and morphology were assessed utilizing Eosin-Nigrosin staining (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MO, USA) (
Björndahl et al., 2003).
Treatments
After 24 h in storage (16°C), each sample (in fractions of 2 ml [1 x 10
-8/ml]) received the following treatments.
T
1: Incubation in a SLO (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MO, USA) solution (0.6 UI/ml) and trehalose (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MO, USA) at 100 µM/ml for 5 minutes at 37°C.
T
2: Incubation in SLO (0.6 UI/ml) and trehalose at 200 µM/ml for 5 minutes.
T
3: Incubation in SLO (0.6 UI/ml) and trehalose at 400 µM/ml for 5 minutes.
T
4: Control group (no treatment just diluted semen).
The incubation in SLO was intended to permeabilize the sperm membrane (
Valdés et al., 2015).
Pores and post-thawing viability evaluation
The observation of pores was done by scanning electronic microscopy (JEOL-JSM-5410-LV, USA)
(Metkar et al., 2015). At the same time, trehalose was added during the incubation to evaluate post-thawing viability. Cryopreservation was made after pore sealing in accordance to
Fawcett et al., (1998) using the two-step freezing protocol proposed by Westerndorf (
Gutiérrez-Pérez et al., 2009). For the control group, the diluent contained 20% egg yolk and 230.8 mM glucose (as a replacement for trehalose). After 15 days of cryopreservation, straws were thawed for 30s in a water bath at 37°C. Then straws were held over liquid nitrogen vapors (4 cm) for 20 min before plunging them into liquid nitrogen. This procedure allowed to reach the optimal rate reported for boar sperm freezing of -30°C/min. Straw contents were placed in tepid assay tubes, previously supplemented with extender in a 1:6 v/v thawed semen/extender proportion. Samples were maintained 10 min at 37°C before evaluating the effect of temperature on motility.
Membrane integrity evaluation
Hypo-osmotic swelling test (HOST) in combination with Coomassie Bright Blue (CBB) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MO, USA) were used to evaluate the integrity of the membrane
(Oliveira et al., 2013). Both tests were carried out in at least three replicates by the same researcher on a 400X magnification with a minimum of 200 cell counts per reading.
Sperm functional status
The functional status of spermatozoa was assessed with Chlortetracycline (CTC) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MO, USA), a fluorescent antibiotic (
Álvarez-Guerrero et al., 2016). This assay allows observing changes in the sperm plasma membrane-associated with the capacitation status of the sperm. The sperms were stained during 30s and then fixed with 22 μl of 0.2% glutaraldehyde. Finally, 10 μl of the fixed sperm solution was placed on a glass slide with an equal amount of DABCO® (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MO, USA) and then covered with a coverslip. Samples were evaluated using an epi-fluorescence microscope (Leica DM 020-518500/LS) with filter blue at 405-455 nm, 400X magnification.
Statistical analysis
Data in each treatment were compared using the non-parametric module of STATISTICA V10.0. Kruskal-Wallis H test was performed to determine effects among treatments and to test if a group of data came from the same population.