Effects on the kinetics of gas production in vitro
In our study, gas production of different groups increased with fermentation time (Fig 1). Whereas gas production was increased in the groups A and C at 24 h (
P<0.05). The data in Table 2 show that the gas produced from soluble fraction (
a) was higher (
P<0.05) in groups D and E (1.83 and 2.10 mL/g DM), whereas the gas produced from insoluble but fermentable fraction (
b) produced was lower (
P<0.05) in group E (41.01 mL/g DM). The highest value was registered for group A (62.76 mL/g DM). The rate of gas production (
c) was higher (
P<0.05) in group A (0.201 mL/g DM), whereas the lowest value for this fraction was observed in group E (0.029 mL/g DM). The reason might be that
L. chinensis was a high-quality forage with a higher NDF content (Table 1) and the rapid degradation of soluble carbohydrates increased the gas production rate in the early stages (
Cone and van Gelder, 1999). The rate of gas production (
c) in group C was higher than groups B, D and E, This could be due to the reason that the proper addition of
U. cannabina can promote the balance of energy and protein in the substrate, which further promote the reproduction of rumen microorganisms
(Tang et al., 2005) and thus increase the gas production rate.
Similarly, the potential gas production (
a + b) was higher for group A than group E (
P<0.05).
Khazaal et al., (1993) pointed out that feed intake is mainly explained by the rate of gas production (
c), which affects the pass rate of feed through the rumen and the potential gas production (
a + b) is related to the degradability of the feed. Therefore the higher values of potential gas production in groups A and C might indicate a better nutrient availability for rumen microorganisms
(Nsahlai et al., 1994).
Effects on the fermentation parameters in vitro
In Fig 2(a), the pH value in all groups was within the normal range during the 24 h fermentation. However, the pH values at 1 h, 3 h and 6 h were increased in groups A and C and at 24 h were observed highest in group C (
P<0.05). The reason might be that the crude protein of
U. cannabina was higher and the digestible protein was up to 70%. A certain addition of
U. cannabina can increase the digestible protein in the fermentation substrate and a large amount of protein degradation promotes the increase of ammonia nitrogen concentration and finally lead to the increased the pH value. It was found that addition of
U. cannabina (100 mg/g) can prevent the effects of rumen acidosis effectively, by increasing the pH value of rumen fluid to 30%
in vitro (
Kleim et al., 2017). Similarly,
Arroquy et al., (2004) reported that as the ratio of rumen degradable protein (RDP) increased, the pH value was also increased linearly within the normal range.
In Fig 2(b), the ammonia nitrogen concentration in all groups was all within the normal range during the 24 h fermentation. However, the ammonia nitrogen in groups D and E was higher at 3 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h. The concentration of ammonia nitrogen is determined by the rumen microbial decomposition of proteins and the rate at which ammonia is used to synthesize microbial proteins. Groups D and E contained higher CP and NFCs contents (Table 1), which lead to higher ammonia nitrogen synthesis. At 24 h, the ammonia nitrogen concentration in group C decreased significantly (
P<0.05), due to the increased ratio of NDF and NFCs and decreased lignin concentration (Table 1) leading to suitable conditions for microbial growth and protein synthesis
(Shen et al., 2017).
Effects on the contents of bacterial and protozoal proteins in vitro
As it can be seen in Fig 2 (c,d), the concentration of bacteria and protozoa protein was higher in groups A and C at 1 h, 3 h and 6 h. The reason might be that
L. chinensis has high-quality forage contents which are more conducive for microbial growth.
Stern et al., (1994) reported that energy and nitrogen balance and simultaneous release of them in the diet determine the growth of rumen microbes, which could change the synthesis efficiency of MCP (bacteria and protozoa protein). In the beginning, the supply of energy and nutrients in the substrate was sufficient to meet the needs of the microorganisms. Fermentation produced a large amount of energy and precursors required for the synthesis of self-proteins by microorganisms such as ammonia, volatile fatty acids and ATP (
Van Soest, 1994). As time went on, the gradual consumption of nutrients and energy and the proliferation of bacteria had reached a stationary stage. In addition, the phagocytosis of protozoa was enhanced, the production of bacterial proteins in the rumen began to decrease and it might also be caused by bacteriolysis
(Sherwood et al., 2012).
The comparison among the groups showed that with the increased ratio of
U. cannabina and the decreased ratio of
L. chinensis, the bacterial and protozoal protein concentrations were decreased. However, this concentration was observed highest in group C at 24 h. This could be due to the certain complementary interaction effect of
U. cannabina and
L. chinensis nutrients (
Haddad, 2000), which promotes the balance of energy and protein in the substrate by influencing the overall increased microbial protein synthesis. It can also be inferred that with the passage of culture time the protozoal protein concentration fluctuated greatly in the groups D and E. It is speculated that some pharmacological effects of
U. cannabina changes the rumen microbiota
(Yang et al., 2013).