The present study used 576 bp of COI sequence to investigate the genetic diversity and population structure of 144
C. mystus individuals from 4 localities. The COI sequence is polymorphic and 58 variable sites and 32 haplotypes were detected. The
C. mystus populations from the north localities of LS, CM and ZS exhibited high haplotype diversity (
h>0.5) and low nucleotide diversity (p<0.005) (Table 1). This result is consistent with previous findings, which also reported high haplotype diversity and low nucleotide diversity among the same species distributed in 3 Chinese estuaries
(Cheng et al., 2008). While the
C. mystus population from the south locality of WZ exhibited low haplotype diversity (
h<0.5) and low nucleotide diversity (p<0.005). Table 1 showed that the p values for
C. mystus in this study were lower than that reported for many other marine fishes.
(Sun et al., 2012; 2013).
Phylogenetic analysis with NJ tree showed that the individuals grouped into two distinct clusters, basically in accord with the geographical sources of the samples, as the individuals from LS, CM and ZS grouped into one cluster and the individuals from WZ grouped into the other cluster (Fig 2). The resultant network exhibited two star-like patterns, one of which surrounding haplotype H_1, with the haplotypes from LS, CM, ZS populations and the other of which surrounding haplotype H_16, with the haplotypes only from the WZ population (Fig 3). The NJ tree of the COI sequence from all individuals and the median-joining networks of all haplotypes suggested that there is a distinct phylogeo--graphic structure across the 4 populations. Table 2 showed the AMOVA analysis results for COI, which exhibited that among group variation (95.888%) accounts for significantly more of the total genetic variation than variation within groups (0.022%) and that within populations (3.990%). The results of the AMOVA revealed that there were two groups, the populations from LS, CM and ZS as the north group and WZ as the south group. In this study,
FST in the three north populations showed no significant difference (
P>0.05), while compared with the southern population, which exhibited significant divergence (
P<0.001) (Table 2). These results were similar with many marine fishes including
Coilia ectenes (Ma et al., 2010), Pampus argenteus (Zhao et al., 2011), Mugil cephalus (Sun et al., 2012) and
Nibea albiflora (Xu et al., 2012), which exhibited significant genetic divergence.
Genetic diversity is influenced by many factors, including historical factors, anthropogenic activity, habitation and a low rate of mitochondrial evolution
(Grant et al., 2006). Historical factors may play an important role in determining the patterns of genetic variability
(Xiao et al., 2009; Yamaguchi et al., 2010). Populations of fishes that experienced rapid expansion following a period of low effective population size often display high haplotype but medium to low nucleotide diversities
(Grant and Bowen, 1998). Moreover, the haplotype network was characterized by two star-like phylogenesis, a typical signature of a past recent population expansion following a population bottleneck
(Avise, 2004). Another factor likely to be responsible for the low genetic diversity in
C. mystus is overexploitation
(Cheng et al., 2008; He et al., 2011), which is known to be one of the main causes of extinction of marine species
(Rodrigues et al., 2008). Also, the genetic divergence for different populations often attributed to the presence of geographic barriers or temporal reproductive isolation. The WZ samples were collected at the inner edge of the Gulf of Wenzhou (Fig 1). The Gulf and islands around the region of WZ seem to act as barriers to gene flow, which could result in high genetic and morphological divergence between WZ and the northern populations
(Yang et al., 2019). We speculated that the physical barriers restricted the gene flow in different group populations. In this study, the gene flow values were very low between the north and south groups (Table 3). This suggests that the different groups have isolated genetic structure and restricted gene flow. Ecological habits, limited long-distance migration and long-term separation have likely played an important role in producing the current genetic structure.