A total of 21 exons of
IGF1R gene were sequenced and only a novel polymorphism in exon 20 (c.3678C>T) were detected. PCR product digestion by endonuclease
TaqI generated fragments with lengths of 200bp and 35bp for genotype CC, 235bp for genotype TT and 235bp, 200bp and 35bp for genotype CT (Table 2, Fig 1). Conflicting to a previous study reported by
Harumi et al., (2001), who identified 12 silent sequence variants in coding regions based on RT-PCR derived
IGF1R sequence in 12 unrelated pigs. The novel SNP in the exon 20 was a missense mutation and located in the cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain of IGF1R protein. The mutations in the kinase domain can cause conformational changes consequently affect the binding capability
(Gately et al., 2015). Hence, the polymorphism in exon 20 (c.3678C>T) resulting in the amino acid changing might have serious consequences for ligand binding, which needed to be further verified.
At the c.3678C>T site, the frequency of the T allele was greater than that of the C allele in the three pig breeds. The frequency of the TT genotype was higher than the other two genotypes. According to the c
2 test statistics, the SNP c.3678C>T in Duroc met Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (
P>0.05), while which in Landrace and Yorkshire breed deviated from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (
P < 0.01). The He of the mutant loci was 0.27, 0.40 and 0.17 in different pig breeds, respectively (Table 4). It was likely that allele frequencies at the QTL is different among breeds and thereby influence genetic and phenotypic variance. The association analysis of
IGFR1 gene genotypes and recorded growth traits within the three different population were analyzed (Table 5). In Landrace breed, animals with the genotype CC had significantly higher ADG of 30-50kg than those with genotypes TT (
P < 0.05). In Yorkshire breed, genotype CC showed differences in ADG of 30-50kg compared to genotypes TT (
P<0.05) and also in the ADG of 50-100kg (
P < 0.01). The CC individuals were characterized by great ADG of 30-50kg and ADG of 50-100kg. In Duroc breed, this SNP had no significant correlation with the recorded growth. Moreover, differences in growth traits between breeds have been reported
(Lents et al., 2016; Tyra et al., 2019).
In the present study, we also screened the SNP in intron 9 in the Duroc, Landrace and Yorkshire breeds. However, only the AA genotype was identified (Table 4), which was consistent with the previous study that the European pigs principally carried allele A and the pigs with AA genotype exhibited greater body weights
(Kopecny et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2006).
Meanwhile,
IGF1R has different influences at various stages of growth and its expression in regulated depending on developmental and functional status
(Cheng et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2019). We detected the differently expressed pattern of
IGF1R in muscle of Yorkshire and Jinhua pigs at different growth stages (Fig 2). In Jinhua pigs,
IGF1R had significantly higher expression at 30-day than at 90-day and 180-day. Compared with Jinhua pigs,
IGF1R showed lower expression at 30-day but higher expression level at 90-day in Yorkshire pigs (
P<0.05). There were no significant differences at 180-day. We speculate that the dramatic difference in longissimus dorsi muscle growth between the two breeds may be partially regulated by
IGF1R at early stage. It is consistent with the difference in longissimus dorsi muscle area observed after but not before day 90 in Jinhua and Landrace pigs, the latter of which are similar in growth to Landrace pigs
(Wu et al., 2013).