Study and sampling
To investigate the population density of
Hyalomma ticks, a cross-sectional study was designed based on the random three districts namely Quetta, Qilla Abdullah and Nushki (Fig 1). Ticks were identified using taxonomic descriptions
(Walker et al., 2014).
In vitro rearing and tick testing
A standard artificial feeding device for ixodid ticks was used in a modified version previously developed by other researchers (
Kröber and Guerin 2007). Ten weeks after immunization, each horse was experimentally challenged with total 500 laboratory reared female
Hyalomma ticks which were exposed on the flank and ear regions within locally made neoprene chambers. Standard formula was used to calculate the immunization efficacy (
Andreotti 2006a).
Antigen preparation and purification
Dorsal integument of adult ticks were removed and extracted protein was rinsed and triturated in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline solution to avoid desiccation of salivary glands. The mixture vortexes and suspended in 150 μL cold PBS mixture with 1% protease inhibitor. Extracted material was homogenized and sonicated for tissue disruption for 40 s three times on ice bath 40 W. The mixture was then centrifuged at 15000 x g for 20 minutes at 4°C in order to collect the supernatant and decanted the pellet. Centrifuged material was filtered through 0.22 μm non-pyrogenic filter membrane and stored at -20°C.
SDS and western blotting
Molecular weight of crude extract protein as well as fractions were determined by discontinuous SDS-PAGE (BDH, Poole. England) as per standard procedure (Lämmli 1970). Total protein concentration for extracted acarine saliva was also estimated (
Brad, 1976). Electroblotted protein bands obtained from SDS-PAGE were transferred to a nitrocellulose paper using a mini blotter (Bio-Rad). Band intensities were analyzed in ChemiDoc Gel Imaging System (Bio-Rad).
Sensitivity and specificity of antigen
Specific diagnostic Indirect-Hemagglutination-Assay (IHA) was also performed taking horse red blood cells with 1 mL sample in EDTA tubes, sensitized with 300 μg/ 2 mL antigen
(Rehman et al., 1994). Red cell agglutination at ≥ 1:25 was considered positive for the presence of antibody
(Harris et al., 2009). White Rabbits weighing 3-4 kg were selected for positive and negative testing groups for the developed vaccine for its possible immunogenic reaction in horses
(Kesdangsakonwut et al., 2014).
Immunogen preparation
Crude protein was emulsified in equal amounts (1:1 ratio) with 1 mL Montanide (ISA-50) and mixed thoroughly on homogenizer before giving it to treatment groups. Three study groups were made comprising of two animals in each group. Group I (IA, IB) received percutaneous, group II (IIA, IIB) intradermal and group III (IIIA, IIIB) for intraperitoneal adjuvants vaccine respectively. Second dose of 500 μg/mL per animal was given after five weeks as described previously
(Iqbal et al., 2016). Preparation was made for the second control group by taking 1 mL of PBS (pH 7.4) emulsified in 1 mL of Montanide (ISA-50) adjuvant and administered through intraperitoneal injection.
Dynamics of humoral response through ELISA
Salivary extract (2 μg/mL) antigen was diluted in carbonate coating buffer (0.1M, pH 9.2). About 100 μL (serially diluted 1:2000) rabbit anti-goat IgG (F9012 Merck, USA) conjugated polyclonal secondary antibodies was added per well and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. Later on, 100 mL of 3,3', 5,5' -Tetramethylbenzidine peroxidase substrate (T0440, Merck, USA) including horseradish peroxidase (Sigma, H1009) and hydrogen peroxide (0.3%) was dispensed and added on titre plate. After sufficient colour development, the absorbance (450 nm) was monitored using microplate reader (Bio-Rad 680, 168-1000) within 30 minutes at 1.0 Optimal Density (OD) with standard error.
Hematological and biochemical parameters
We ensured to follow the standard operating procedures for current experiment
(Bimerew et al., 2018). Hematological analysis was carried out using automatic hematology analyzer (XS-500i-Sysmex Europe GmBH) and were also compared with standard hematological parameters described in Schalm’s Equine Hematology
(Walton 2013). Biochemical levels were determined using OLYMPUS AU 680 analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Japan) and were compared with earlier reported values
(Aros et al., 2017; Cywiñska et al., 2015).
Statistical analysis
ArcGIS software was used to map tick collection sites. Data were analyzed in three ways: (i) Data related to the vaccine efficacy were analyzed by applying Student t-test (
p (one tail) <0.05, considered significant), using PAST 3.2 (Øyvind Hammer, Natural History Museum, University of Oslo) (ii) Data on possible risk factors of hard-bodied tick burden and associated aspects in farmland were assessed by applying Mantel-Haenszel analysis based on odds ratio (OR) at 95% confidence intervals using WinEpi-info
® 7.0 (CSELS) (iii) Mean values of hematological and biochemical parameters were evaluated on ANOVA using SPSS® 20.0 (Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).