Genetic polymorphism
The experimental samples were divided into three groups: Black Pigs, Duroc and Landrace. The electrophoresis results of twelve microsatellites are shown in Fig 1. The three experimental groups detected a total of 150 alleles in twelve microsatellite loci (Table 2). From Fig 1 and Table 2, the twelve microsatellite loci polymorphism richer, for the average observed numbers of alleles, Black Pigs, Duroc and Landrace was 4.5833, 4.0000 and 3.9167. The average Shannon index of Black Pigs, Duroc and Landrace was 1.2738, 1.1836 and 1.1407. The average expected heterozygosity (He) of Black Pigs, Duroc and Landrace was 0.6802, 0.6857 and 0.6370. The highest polymorphic information content (PIC) of Black Pigs, Duroc and Landrace was 0.6192, 0.5919 and 0.5642.
Henan Western Black pigs are rich in genetic polymorphism. In our study, it had a more uniform allele distribution than Lanyu pigs
(Chang et al., 2009). Henan Western Black pigs had a higher heterozygosity (0.6802) than several breeds including European pigs breeds (0.570) (Zhang and Graham, 2011), the Greek black pigs breeds (0.624)
(Michailidou et al., 2014), the Criollo pigs breeds (0.622) (Revidatti
et al., 2014), however, Henan Western Black Pigs were lower than Jeju Black Pig (0.706) (Oh
et al., 2014). Thus, the Black Pig populations of Henan Western Black Pigs appear to have higher levels of genetic polymorphism than the experiment of Sahoo (2015b). The Shannon index reflects the uniformity of genetic variation. In our study, the Shannon index (I) ranged from 0.2449 to 1.7418, the average Shannon index of Black Pigs, Duroc and Landrace pigs was 1.2738, 1.1836 and 1.1407. This is different from the Landrace pigs Shannon Index (0.207)
(Kim et al., 2002), which may be a difference in microsatellite sites and lead to differences in the Shannon index. The PIC is an important parameter in genetic diversity analysis as it reflects the amount of genetic information and the level of gene richness (Nagy
et al., 2012). Among the twelve microsatellite loci in this study, SO155 was a low polymorphic marker, SO026, SO090 and SW911 were moderate polymorphic markers, and the remaining eight microsatellites were highly polymorphic markers.
Genetic distance reflects the phylogenetic evolution of the population studied, it is used to describe the genetic structure of the population and the differences between the varieties
(Bai et al., 2015). It can be seen from Table 3 that the minimum genetic distance between the Black Pig and Duroc was 0.1414, while genetic distance between Landrace and Black Pig, Duroc were 0.1602 and 0.1864, respectively. According to the clustering diagram of Fig 2, the Black Pig with the Duroc were first clustered as a class, and then clustered with the Landrace.
The genetic resources of Henan Western Black Pigs had mutated. The inbreeding coefficient (Fis) and the genetic divergence (Fst) are two important indexes of the genetic differentiation and genetic distance between populations
(Cortés
et_al2016). When genetic divergence (Fst) >0.25, genetic variation was very serious; when 0.25 ≥ genetic divergence (Fst) >0.15, genetic variation was higher; when 0.15 ≥ genetic divergence (Fst) >0.05, genetic variation was moderate; when 0.05 ≥ genetic divergence (Fst) >0, genetic variation was smaller
(Sahoo et al., 2016). In this study, at two loci (SO090, SO002) the Fis value deviated significantly from zero, at five loci of genetic variation was smaller, at six loci of genetic variation was moderate, only one microsatellite loci (SO155) had a higher genetic variation. Genetic differentiation analysis of Black Pigs, Duroc and Landrace pigs showed that the microsatellite loci SW24, SO090, SW1067, SO002, and SW857 had the least genetic differentiation, while the remaining seven loci were moderately differentiated (Table 4). The inbreeding coefficient (Fis) ranged from -0.2328 (SO002) to 0.3684 (SW1067). The genetic differentiation factor (Fst) also varied among loci, ranging from 0.0197 (SO155) to 0.1655 (SO090). The gene flow (Nm) at each locus was greater than 1, with an average of 3.8155.
Associations with microsatellite markers
In examining the associations between microsatellite loci and growth traits (height, back height, body length, chest width, chest depth, head length, ear area and forehead width) (Table 5). Microsatellite loci of SW72 were significantly associated with back height and chest depth (P<0.05), while SO002 were significantly associated with chest depth and head length (P<0.05). SW632 was only significantly associated with head length (P<0.05), SO090 was only significantly associated with body length (P<0.05) and SW1828 was only significantly associated with head length. There were no significant differences in other microsatellite loci, including SO026, SO155, SW24, SW240, SW1067, SW911 and SW875 (P>0.05).
Among them, there are three microsatellite markers affecting the head length: SW632, SW1828 and SO002; there are two microsatellite markers affecting chest depth: SW72 and SO002. In addition, SW72 has an impact on the back height and SO090 has an effect on body length. This indicates that certain traits may be controlled by multiple QTLs (or major genes).