Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Neutrophil phagocytic activity of piglets born from sows supplemented with organic or inorganic selenium 

M.J. Andonova1,*
1Department of General and Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Trakia University, 6015 Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.
The effects of inorganic or organic selenium supplementation of diets of pregnant sows on neutrophil phagocytic activity in their offspring were investigated. The experimental piglets – newborn (n=9); 20-day-old (n=12) and 40-day-old (n=12) were born from sows supplemented with feed containing 0.9 ppm Sel-Plex® and 0.9 ppm sodium selenite 50 days prepartum to the 35th day postpartum. Blood selenium in 20-day-old and 40-day-old piglets whose dams received Sel-Plex® (Group I) and sodium selenite (Group II) was higher (p<0.001) than in offspring of non-supplemented sows (Group III). Also, blood selenium in 40-day-old piglets from Group I was higher vs Group II (p<0.001). Selenium levels did not correspond to phagocytic activity of neutrophils. The highest segmented neutrophil counts, phagocytosis percentage and phagocytic number were established in newborn piglets, regardless of sows’ supplementation, whereas the lowest values of parameters were found out in 40-day-old animals despite the substantial blood selenium reserve.
Selenium is a trace element and essential supplement to the diet of various biological species (Moeini et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2011; Waseem et al., 2016; Bunglavan et al., 2018; Prakash et al., 2019). It is actively involved in the formation of selenoprotein-containing foetal tissues (Kohrl et al., 2000). This element is essential for the normal function of all body systems, including the immune system (Hawkes et al., 2001; Ferencik and Ebringer, 2003). It regulates the antioxidant processes (Karren et al., 2010), phagocytosis (Wuryastuti et al., 1993; Okpala et al., 2015), inflammation (Mattmiller et al., 2013). Seleinium is involved in thyroid gland metabolism (De Vito et al., 2011; Konecny et al., 2015), helps the formation of reserve in the mammary gland (Slavik et al., 2008). Newborns with better selenium status are less frequently affected with diseases, associated with selenium deficiency (myopathies, liver necrosis) and worsened innate resistance (Hefnawy and Tortoro-Perez, 2010). Inorganic selenium solves the problems with deficiency states, but in nature, it is found in plants bound to amino acids (selenomethionine, selenocysteine) (Schrauzer, 2000). That is why, the form in which selenium is found in feeds is important for its utilisation by the body (Mahan, 2000; Stewart et al., 2012).  

Nutritional immunity is an approach of improving body defense by optimisation of the feeding regimen (Buttgereit et al., 2000; Butcher and Miles, 2002; Chandra, 2002; Marcos et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2016; Valpotic et al., 2016). Despite the acknowledged positive relationship between feed quality during the pregnancy of sows and the immune defense of newborns (Wu et al., 2004; Abu-Saad and Fraser, 2010) there are issues related to the transfer of trace elements and nutrients from the diet to the foetus-newborn system that are still unclear. The evaluation is further impeded by the numerous factors influencing pregnancy and parturition related to individual features- age, functional status of genitals, endocrine status, cytokine profile (Daher et al., 2004; Lewis, 2004; Moffett and Loke, 2004; Wu et al., 2012). As macro- and micronutrients are regulators of metabolism of energy substrates during the foetal growth and pregnant animals could not produce them, they should be present in rations (Jobgen et al., 2006; Wu et al., 2012). Hence, the aim of this study was investigate the effects of inorganic or organic selenium supplementation of diets of pregnant sows on neutrophil phagocytic activity in their offspring.
Piglets used in the study - newborn (n=9); 20-day-old (n=12) and 40-day-old (n=12) were born from sows, crosses of Landrace and Large White. Sows were artificially inseminated and pregnancy was detected by examination with Aloka SSD 500 ultrasound (Dimitrov et al., 2003). Fifty days prepartum and 35 days postpartum (for a total of 85 days), the basic ration of sows (barley 35%, wheat 34%, sunflower meal 14%, bran 12%) was supplemented with 3-5% mineral premix for sows (Agrex Ltd Sofia, Bulgaria). The premix did not contain any selenium for control group of sows (n=3). Sows from Group I (n=6) received also organic selenium (Sel-Plex®, Alltech Inc., USA; 0.3 ppm/kg) to the premix and those from Group II (n=6) received sodium selenite (Alltech Inc., USA; 0.3 ppm/kg). The daily diet of every Se-supplemented sow was 3 kg feed, which contained either 0.9 ppm organic or 0.9 ppm inorganic Se. All sows were placed under uniform rearing conditions and the same immunoprophylaxis and antiparasitic applied at the pig farm (field experiment). Animal welfare and public health guidelines were strictly observed by the farm staff.

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria and national regulations with respect to living environment conditions - ventilation, temperature, humidity, lighting, noise, bedding, as well as the specific conditions for growing the individual age groups.
 
Sample collection
 
All blood samples of piglets were collected in the morning between 8.00-8.30 AM to avoid circadian rhythm influence. Collection was compliant with animal protection and welfare norms. For phagocytosis assays, heparinised blood (25-30 U/mL) was sampled from sinus ophthalmicus after sedation with àlkaine 0.5% eye drops, solution (S.A. ALKON-COUVREUR N.V., Belgium). For collection of serum, plain tubes were used, samples were left to clot at room temperature and then centrifuged for 10 min at 3,000´g.
 
Parameters and assay methods
 
Serum Se concentrations were assayed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Buck Scientific 200A). Total leukocytes (109/L) were counted in the Bürker chamber. Differential leukocyte counts were determined on blood smears stained by Romanovski-Giemsa. Absolute segmented neutrophil count was obtained by multiplication of segmented neutrophil percentage and total leukocyte counts, divided to 100. Phagocytosis was assayed by immunofluorescence method of Samnaliev et al., (1995) using a XSZ N107E fluorescence microscope. This in vitro method used blood and serum. Cell nuclei were stained brown-red with ethidium bromide, while phagocytosis object was visualised by fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC). Percentage of phagocytosis and phagocytic number were defined by counting 150 neutrophils on the smear.

Statistical analysis
 
Data (mean±SEM) were submitted to one-way ANOVA and LSD post hoc test. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to evaluate the normal distribution of data in each sample.
Serum selenium concentration in piglets
 
Serum Se levels in 20-day-old and 40-day-old offspring of sows supplemented with Sel-Plex® (Group I), sodium selenite (Group II) and control sows (Group III) were statistically significantly higher (p<0.001) in piglets from Group I and II vs controls, in line with the report of Wu et al., (2012) for the existence of a relationship between feeding of pregnant animals and their offspring. In 20-day-old offspring of sows from Group I and II, blood Se levels were similar (0.145±0.006 ppm and 0.132±0.006 ppm respectively) (Table 1), allowing affirming that the transfer of this trace element from the feed of sows to offspring took place regardless of the supplement form (organic or inorganic). On the opposite, 40-day-old piglets from Group I exhibited significantly higher blood Se levels than those from Group II (p<0.001), showing that organic Se was a more appropriate form for storage of selenium in the body. The chosen approach for dietary supplementation with organic (Sel-Plex®) and inorganic (sodium selenite) to pregnant sows ensures the biological activity of the element and prevented its overdosing and toxicity in the offspring. The inconsistent data on the relationship between systemic selenium reserve and immune protection efficiency (Valenta et al., 2012) focuses the attention on the status of innate defense mechanisms as a first line of defense.

Table 1: Serum selenium concentrations (ppm) in 20-day-old and 40-day-old piglets born from sows supplemented with Sel-Plex® (Group I), sodium selenite (Group II) and non-supplemented sows (Group III). Data are presented as mean±SEM.


 
Phagocytosis and phagocytic parameters
 
Our data exhibited that newborn piglets had sufficient cellular factors of innate resistance (Table 2). Regardless of the group, absolute segmented neutrophil count varied from 3.56±0.92x109/L for Group I, 3.08±0.82x109/L for Group II and 3.38±0.28x109/L for Group III. In 20-day-old piglets, average counts decreased to 1.92±0.32x109/L (Group I), 2.44±0.31x109/L (Group II) and 1.96±0.26´109/L (Group III) and to 40 days of age, segmented neutrophil counts increased statistically significantly exceeding values in 20-day-old animals (Table 2). The described changes in 20-day-old piglets are possibly associated to weaning (Mike and Varley, 2001), while in 40-day-olds, changes could reflect the start of immunological maturation. Neutrophils are the most active mobile phagocytes (Mizgerd, 2002; Tizard, 2013), that is why their phagocytic activity has been determined. Phagocytosis percentages were high in neonates, not only in controls (p<0.01), but also in Group II (p<0.001) compared to 40-day-old piglets, in which phagocytosis percentages were lower both vs those in newborns and vs 20-day-old animals as well (Table 2). Phagocytic numbers were also high in neonates. Therefore, cellular factors of innate immunity were well manifested as early as after birth. Similar studies (Satwani et al., 2005; Jiang et al., 2009; Kollmann et al., 2009; Dowling and Levy, 2014) are focused on mechanisms of defense in newborns. Data however show clearly that the changes in cellular elements of innate resistance in newborn piglets and in piglets at 20 and 40 days of age were age-dependent and not related to selenium reserves of animals. That is why the knowledge of the main tendencies in cellular and humoral factors of innate immunity after birth is a reliable background for developing new approaches for immune response optimisation.

Table 2: Phagocytosis percentage and phagocytic parameters in newborn, 20-day-old and 40-day-old piglets born from sows supplemented with Sel-Plex® (Group I), sodium selenite (Group II) and non-supplemented sows (Group III). Data are presented as mean±SEM.

High blood selenium concentration in the offspring of sows supplemented with either organic or inorganic selenium, did not correspond to phagocytic activity of neutrophils. Data provided evidence of highest absolute segmented neutrophil counts, phagocytosis percentage and phagocytic number in newborn piglets regardless of regardless of sows’ supplementation. The lowest values of parameters were found out in 40-day-old animals despite their substantial blood selenium reserve.
Many thanks to Mrs Daniela Ivanova, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, for her technical assistance in preparing this manuscript.  

  1. Abu-Saad, K. and Fraser, D. (2010). Maternal nutrition and birth outcomes. Epidemiol. Rev., 32: 5-25. DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxq001.

  2. Bunglavan, S.J., Garg, A.K., Dass, R.S., Shrivastava S. (2018). Effect of varied levels of selenium supplementation in nano form on growth, nutrient intake and digestibility in Wistar albino rats. Ind. JAnim. Res., 52: 248-253. DOI: 10.18805/ijar.B-3148‘

  3. Butcher, G.D. and Miles, R.D. (2002). Interrelationship of nutrition and immunity. Veterinary Medicine-Large Animal Clinical Sciences. Department Document VM 139 (University of Florida, USA). https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/VM/VM10400.pdf.

  4. Buttgereit, F., Burmester, G.R., Brand, M.D. (2000). Bioenergetics of immune functions: fundamental and therapeutic aspects. Immunol Today, 21: 192-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5699(00)01593-0

  5. Chandra, R.K. (2002). Nutrition and the immune system from birth to old age. Eur J Clin Nutr, 56: S73-S76. DOI:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601492.

  6. Daher, S., de Arruda, G., Denardi, K. , Blotta, M.H., Mamoni, R.L., Reck, A.P., Camano, L., Mattar, R. (2004). Cytokines in recurrent pregnancy loss. J Reprod. Immunol., 62: 151-157. DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2003.10.004 

  7. De Vito, P., Incerpi, S., Pedersen, J.Z., Luly, P., Davis, F.B., Davis, P.J. (2011). Thyroid hormones as modulators of immune activities at the cellular level. Thyroid, 21: 879-890. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2010.0429

  8. Dimitrov, Ì., Yotov, S., Vasilev, N., Georgiev, P., Dimitrov, Ph. (2003). Role of organic selenium Sel-Plex on productivity of sows and neonate piglets. In: Proceedings from the International Scientific Conference 70 years Regional Veterinary Institute – Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria: 121-127.

  9. Dowling, D.J. and Levy, O. (2014). Ontogeny of early life immunity. Trends Immunol., 35: 299-310. DOI:10.1016/j.it.2014.04.007.

  10. Ferencik, M. and Ebringer, L. (2003). Modulatory effects of selenium and zinc on the immune system. Folia Microbiol., 48: 417-426. DOI:10.1007/BF02931378

  11. Hawkes, W.C., Kelley, D.S., Taylor, P.C. (2001). The effects of dietary selenium on the immune system in healthy men. Biol. Trace Elem. Res., 81: 189-213. DOI:10.1385/BTER:81:3:189

  12. Hefnawy, A.E.G. and Tortoro-Perez, J.L. (2010). The importance of selenium and the effects of its deficiency in animal health. Small Rum. Res., 89: 185-192. DOI:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.12.042

  13. Jiang, H., vandeVen, C., Baxi, L., Satwani, P., Cairo, M.S. (2009). Differential gene expres- sionsig natures of adult peripheral blood vs cord blood monocyte-derived immature and mature dendritic cells. Exp. Hematol., 37: 1201-1215. DOI:10.1016/j.exphem. 2009.07.010

  14. Jobgen, W.S., Fried, S.K., Fu, W.J., Meininger, C.J., Wu, G. (2006). Regulatory role for the arginine-nitric oxide pathway in metabolism of energy substrates. J Nutr. Biochem., 17: 571-588. DOI:10.1016/j.jnutbio.2005.12.001

  15. Karren, B.J., Thorson, J.F., Cavinder, C.A., Hammer, C.F., Coverdale, J.A. (2010). Effect of selenium supplementation and plane of nutrition on mares and their foals: Selenium concentrations and glutathione peroxidase. J Anim. Sci., 88: 991-997. DOI:10.2527/jas.2008-1743

  16. Kohrl, J., Brigelius-Flohe, R., Bock, A., Gartner, R., Meyer, O., Flohe, L. (2000). Selenium in biology: facts and medical perspectives. Biol. Chem., 381: 849-864. DOI:10.1515/BC.2000.107.

  17. Kollmann, T.R., Crabtree, J., Rein-Weston, A., Blimkie, D., Thommai, F., Wang, X.Y. (2009). Neonatal innate TLR-mediated responses are distinct from those of adults. J Immunol., 183: 7150-7160. DOI:10.4049/jimmunol.0901481

  18. Konecny, R., Hasoòová, L., Trávníèek, J., Samková, E., Hladký, J., Køížová, Z. (2015). Effect of organic selenium and ýodine supplementation on selenium and thyroid hormones status of lactating ewes and lambs. Acta Vet., 65: 477-487. DOI:10.1515/acve-2015-0040.

  19. Lee, K.I., Kye, Y.C., Kim, G., Kim, H.W., Gu, M.J., Umboh, J., Maaruf , K., Woo, S., Kim S.W., Yun, C.H. (2016). Stress, nutrition, and intestinal immune responses in pigs - A Review. Asian-Australasian J Anim. Sci., 29: 1075-1082. DOI:10.5713/    ajas.16.0118.

  20. Lewis, G.S. (2004). Steroidal regulation of uterine immune defenses. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 82: 281–294. DOI:10.1016/j.anireprosci. 2004.04.026

  21. Mahan, D.C. (2000). Effect of organic and inorganic selenium sources and levels on sow colostrum and milk selenium concentration. J Anim. Sci., 78: 100.DOI:10.2527/2000.781100x

  22. Marcos, A., Nova, E., Montero, A. (2003). Changes in the immune system are conditioned by nutrition. Eur. J Clin. Nutr., 57: S66-S69. DOI:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601819.

  23. Mattmiller, S.A., Carlson, B.A., Sordillo, L.M. (2013). Regulation of inflammation by selenium and selenoproteins: impact on eicosanoid biosynthesis. J Nutr. Sci., 2: e28. DOI:10.1017/jns.2013.17

  24. Mike, A. and Varley, J.W. (2001). The Weaner Pig: Nutrition and Management. Wallingford, CAB International, CABI Publishing. https://www.cabi.org/ahpc/ebook/20013155798.

  25. Mizgerd, J. (2002). Molecular mechanisms of neutrophil recruitment elicited by bacteria in the lung. Seminars Immunol., 14: 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1006/smim.2001.0349.

  26. Moeini, M.M., Kiani, A., Karami, H., Mikaeili, E. (2011). The effect of selenium administration on the selenium, copper, iron and zinc status of pregnant heifers and their newborn calves. J Agr. Sci. Tech., 13: 53-59. lrr.modares.ac.ir/article-23-6918-en.pdf

  27. Moffett, A. and Loke, Y.W. (2004). The immunological paradox of pregnancy: a reappraisal. Placenta, 25: 1-8. DOI:10.1016/S0143-4004(03)00167-X.

  28. Okpala, P., Omenyi, S., Ozoegwu, G. Achebe, C. (2015). Analysis of the dynamic energy flow associated with phagocytosis of bacteria. Heliyon, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.e00021.

  29. Prakash, B., Rao, S.V.R., Raju, M.V.L.N, Reddy, C.S. (2019). Effect of supplementing selenized yeast on performance and anti-oxidant responses in Vanaraja and commercial broiler chickens. Indian J Anim. Res.,53: 500-504. DOI:10.18805/ijar.B-3520.

  30. Samnaliev, M., Mladenov, K., Drashkova, T., Samnalieva, T., Padeshky, P., Radinov, A. (1995). Development and clinical assessment of some nonspecific factors of immunity. Proc First Nat. Congress of Immunology, 1-3 November (Bulgaria) 31: 135. 

  31. Satwani, P., Morris, E., vandeVen, C., Cairo, M.S. (2005). Dysregulation of expression of immunoregulatory and cytokine genes and its association with the immaturity in neonatal phagocytic and cellular immunity. Biol. Neonate. 88: 214–227. DOI:10.1159/    000087585

  32. Schrauzer, G.N. (2000). Selenomethionine: A review of its nutritional significance, metabolism, and toxicity. J Nutr., 130: 1653-1656. DOI:10.1093/jn/130.7.1653

  33. Slavik, P., Illek, J., Brix, M., Hlavicova, J., Rajmon, R. Jilek, F. (2008). Influence of organic versus inorganic dietary selenium supplementation on the concentration of selenium in colostrums, milk and blood of beef cows. Acta Vet. Scand., 50: 1-6. DOI:10.1186/1751-0147-50-43

  34. Stewart, W.C., Bobe, G., Pirelli, G.J., Mosher, W.D., Hall, J.A. (2012). Organic and inorganic selenium: III. Ewe and progeny performance. J Anim. Sci., 90: 4536-4543. DOI:10.2527/jas2011-5019

  35. Tizard, I.R. (2013). Innate immunity: Neutrophils and Phagocytosis. In: Veterinary Immunology. 9th eds. Elsevier, Saunders, 30-41.

  36. Valenta, J., Brodska, H., Drabek, T., Stach, Z., Zima, T., Kazda, A. (2012). Selenium: an important trace element and therapeutic adjunct in critical care. Trace Elem. Electrolyte. 29: 246-255. DOI: 10.5414/TE0X1250

  37. Valpotic, H., Baric-Rafaj, R., Mrljak, V., Bizic, F., Grabarevic, Z., Samardzija, M., Folnozic, I., Duricic, D., Gracner, D., Valpotic, I. (2016). The influences of immune modulation with levamisole and polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymers on the immunohematological, serum biochemical parameters and intestinal histocytomorphology of weaned pigs. Vet. Arhiv. 86: 667-684. vetarhiv.vef.unizg.hr/papers/2016-86-5-6.pdf.

  38. Waseem, M.Z., Anjum, K., Saima, N., Jibran, H. (2016). Organic and inorganic selenium in poultry: A review. Indian J Anim. Res., 10.18805/ijar.v0iOF.6837.

  39. Wu, G., Bazer, F.W., Cudd, T.A., Meininger, C.J., Spencer, T.E. (2004). Maternal nutrition and fetal development. J Nutr., 134: 2169-2172. DOI:10.1093/jn/134.9.2169.

  40. Wu, R., Zhan, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, M., Yuan, D. (2011). Effect of different selenomethionine forms and levels on performance of breeder hens and Se distribution of tissue and egg inclusion. Bio. Trace Elem. Res., 143: 923-931. DOI:10.1007/s12011-010-8886-8.

  41. Wu, G., Imhoff-Kunsch, B., Girard, A.W. (2012). Biological mechanisms for nutritional regulation of maternal health and fetal development. Paediatr Perinat. Epidemiol., 26: 4-26. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01291.x.

  42. Wuryastuti, H., Stowe, H.D., Bull, R.W., Miller, E.R. (1993). Effects of vitamin E and selenium on immune responses of peripheral blood, colostrum, and milk leukocytes of sows. J Anim. Sci., 71: 2464-2472. DOI: 10.2527/1993.7192464x. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)