Objective evaluation of cardiac size was made through echocardiographic and objective radiographic evaluation. Echocardiographic measurements and indices of the examined goats are given in Table 1.
Radiographic examination of the thorax provided efficient visualization of the, trachea, lung, cardiac silhouette and major blood vessels. Thoracic boundaries included the thoracic vertebrae dorsally, sternum ventrally, the thoracic inlet cranially and the diaphragmatic crura caudally.
The VHS in clinically normal Zaraibi goats ranged from 7.3 to 8.8 with (Mean±SD: 8.0±0.4 vertebrae), while the CTR ranged from 17.1 to 24.6% (Mean±SD: 20.1±2.2%). Detailed VHS and CTR are represented in Table 2. Significant weak correlation was recorded between VHS and CTR in normal goats (Fig 2).
The study was conducted on clinically normal goats of only one breed
(Radhika et al., 2018) to exclude interbreeds variations of cardiac size and shape. Goats included in the study were of homogenous age and body weight to exclude the statistically significant differences related to age or body weight
(Mule et al., 2014; Panti et al., 2016).
In the present study, right lateral thoracic radiographs were used to calculate the VHS and CTR. It has been reported that lateral thoracic radiographs were more preferable over the ventro-dorsal ones as it is less stressful for cardiac patients. Moreover, ventro-dorsal view may result in image magnification due to increased distance between the heart and the X-ray cassette. The long axis of the heart in ventro-dorsal view includes the right atrium and left ventricle, whereas it includes the left atrium and left ventricle in lateral views
(Buchanan and Bucheler, 1995; Buchanan, 2000, Fox, 2003; Gulanber et al., 2005). Increased cardiac size was best diagnosed in lateral radiographs rather than ventrodorsal radiographs as the increase in cardiac size occurs in latero-medial direction more than in cranio-caudal direction
(Torad and Hassan, 2014). No significant differences have been reported in VHS values calculated from right and left lateral thoracic radiographs in dogs
(Marin et al., 2007).
The procedure of VHS evaluation is easy and depends on selection of reference points to measure long and short axes of the heart. Hence, VHS is not affected by the observer experience
(Hansson et al., 2005).
The mean reference VHS obtained in Zaraibi goats included in the present study (8.0±0.4 vertebrae) was relatively lower than previous reports on small East African goats (10.02±0.33 vertebrae), although the mean weight in the present study (34.6±3.1 kg) was relatively higher than the small East African goats (17.54±3.85 kg)
(Makungu and Paulo, 2014). This finding supported the breed-specific variations of normal heart size and shape
(Root and Bahr, 2002; Azevedo et al. (2016)). One of the limitations of VHS calculation is that it relies only on two linear measurements and not the entire cardiac silhouette. Therefore, mild changes in cardiac size may not be detected by VHS
(Lamb et al., 2000; Torad and Hassan, 2014). The CTR is a newly developed diagnostic tool for cardiac size evaluation that has been previously used in human, dog, cat but not in goats
(Screaton, 2010; Torad and Hassan, 2014; Birsan et al., 2016). CTR depends on evaluation of the entire cardiac silhouette relative to the thoracic contour, therefore subtle changes in cardiac size as well as generalized cardiac enlargement could be detected
(Torad and Hassan, 2014).
The weak correlation between VHS and CTR in the present study can be attributed to the VHS which relies on evaluating two linear measurements of cardiac dimensions, while the CTR relies on evaluating the entire cardiac area in relation to the thoracic area. The main limitation of the present study is evaluation of cardiac size in normal Zaraibi goats only, further studies warranting to evaluate cardiac size in goats with cardiac diseases.