Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.5 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 55 issue 1 (january 2021) : 109-114

Caecal microbiome and metabolites associated with different growth performances of broilers

Xue Chen1, Wei Zhao1, Yang-zhi Liu1, Natnael Demelash4, Zhe Sun2,3, Xue-feng Zhang2, Tao Wang2, Yu-guo Zhen2,*, Gui-xin-Qin1
1College of Animal Science and Technology, JLAU-Borui Dairy Science and Technology R and D Centre, Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of Jilin Province, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun-130118, P.R.China.
2Postdoctoral Scientific Research Workstation, Feed Engineering Technology Research Center of Jilin Province, Changchun Borul Science and Technology Co., Ltd, Changchun-130118, P.R. China.
3College of Life Science, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun-130118, P.R. China.
4College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, Dilla University, Ethiopia.
Cite article:- Chen Xue, Zhao Wei, Liu Yang-zhi, Demelash Natnael, Sun Zhe, Zhang Xue-feng, Wang Tao, Zhen Yu-guo, Gui-xin-Qin (2019). Caecal microbiome and metabolites associated with different growth performances of broilers . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 55(1): 109-114. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-1062.
We investigated changes in the caecal microbial composition and metabolic compounds of broiler chickens weighing approximately 0.8–1.5 kg. Arbor Acres (AA) broilers (n =186) were divided into four groups (A–D) according to body weight on day 35. The results showed that there were significant differences in the average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG), and feed-to-gain ratio (F:G) of chickens (P < 0.05). The abundance of 11 genera were found to be significantly different in the four groups (P < 0.05). The broilers with poor performance had increased levels of D-mannose, hexadecanoic acid, cholesterol, L-valine, L-leucine, glutamic acid, glucopyranose, á-D-allopyranose, and phosphoric acid (P < 0.05) in the cecum. Microbial compositions were different in the ceca of broilers with different growth performances, and higher growth performance correlated with changes in metabolic pathways related to energy, amino acids, and others.
Broiler performance has been found to be influenced by a range of factors such as breed, sex, diet and growth environment (Korver, et al., 2004; Brake et al., 2003; Ali et al., 2018; Ghosh et al., 2012). However, even for broilers of the same breed, sex and age that are raised in controlled environments with the same diet and water, the growth performance of individuals is different. Some studies have investigated the effects of the environment (Butler et al., 2016), age, sex (Lumpkins et al., 2008), supplement addition (Biswas et al., 2018) and differential feed conversion ration (Stanley et al., 2012) on the gut microbiota of chickens. In poultry, the cecum is the most studied gastrointestinal tract because it is an ideal habitat for the microbiome and caecal microbiota have the ability to digest feeds rich in cellulose, starch and resistant polysaccharides (Clench and Mathias 1995).
        
In this study, we report changes in the cecal microbiome and metabolites in broilers with different growth performances using high-throughput sequencing and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Our findings may be applicable not only to the livestock industry but also to human health.
A total of 200 one-day-old Arbor Acres broilers were obtained from a local commercial hatchery (Jilin Deda Company, Changchun, China). The broilers were placed on a plastic net (6 m×10 m) and each broiler was weighed with the stomachs empty on day 35. One hundred eighty-six AA broilers were selected and divided into four groups according to body weight, with the chickens of each group differing by 0.2 kg: group A (1.5~1.7 kg), group B (1.3~1.5 kg), group C (1.0~1.3 kg) and group D (0.8~1.0 kg). Each group had 46, 53, 76 and 11 broilers, respectively. Groups A and B had 6 replicate pens with approximately equal to 8 to 9 broilers per pen and group C had 6 replicate pens with 12~13 broilers per pen and the replicates were placed in cages (1.5 m×1 m×0.75 m). Group D had six replicates with 1~2 broilers that were placed in small cages (0.3 m×0.3 m×0.75m). The diet and water were offered ad libitum and the broilers were fed a standard corn/soybean meal ration without antimicrobial additives which met the 1994 National Research Council (NRC 1994, Table 1) standards.
 

Table 1: Ingredient and chemical composition of the basal diets.



During the experimental period from days 35 to 42, feed intake was recorded daily for each pen. On day 42, broilers were weighed with the empty stomachs by the pen in the morning to detect the ADFI, ADG and F:G. Two broilers per replicate pen were sacrificed on day 42 and one side of the caecum (digesta) was tied using string and stored at -20°C for DNA extraction and the remaining part was stored at -80°C until GC/MS analysis.
        
DNA of the cecum was isolated using the Fast DNA Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biotechnology, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. The DNA samples were sent to Biomarker Technologies Co, Ltd (China) for PCR amplification and high-throughput sequencing with the Illumina Hiseq method.
        
The cecal digesta samples were dried by a freeze drier (MIKRO-22R, Germany) for 24 h and 0.05 g of dried samples were mixed with 100 μl (20 mg/ml) methoxyamine hydrochloride and pyridine and vigorously vortexed and mixed for 30 s in 1.5 ml tubes. Then the samples were heated in a water bath at 37°C for 90 min, followed by 200 µl bis (trimethylsilyl)-trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) with 1% trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS) being added and heated at 70°C for 60 min. The tubes were taken out and left to stand for 10 min at room temperature and subsequently the samples were centrifuged at 13,000×g at 4°C for 5 min. Then 50 μl of the supernatant of each sample was transferred to a GC vial.
        
Each sample (1 μl) was injected into an Agilent 7890/5975C system equipped with a fused silica capillary column (30.0 m×0.25 mm i.d.) with a 0.25-μm HP-5MS stationary phase (Agilent, Shanghai, China). Helium was used as the carrier at a constant flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The temperature of the column was maintained at 70°C for 4 min, increased to 100°C at a rate of 4°C/min and maintained for 5 min, increased to 150°C at a rate of 10°C/min and maintained for 10 min, then increased to 240°C at a rate of 5°C/min and maintained for 8 min and finally increased to 270°C at a rate of 10°C/min and maintained for 5 min. The temperature of injection, quadrupole and ion source were 280, 230 and 150°C, respectively. The mass spectra were acquired from 20-800 m/z.
        
Data of growth performance and cecal microbiota (at the genus level) were analyzed using the SPSS 17.0 and differences between means were assessed using Duncan’s multiple-range test. The results are presented as means ± standard deviation. The metabolic profile data were processed by SIMCA 13.0 software and orthogonal partial least squares-discriminate analysis (OPLS-DA) and principal component analysis (PCA) were employed to process the cecum metabolomic data. Both the variable importance in the projection (VIP>1) values and Student’s t test (P<0.05) were compared to find the metabolites among the groups.
The ADFI of group D was significantly lower than those of groups A, B and C (P < 0.05, Table 2). The ADG of the groups A, B, C and D on day 42 increased with increasing weight on day 35 and there were significant differences among the groups (P < 0.05). Compared with group A, the F:G was significantly increased by 14.86%, 42.86% and 72.00% in groups B, C and D, respectively. It can be concluded that the ADFI, ADG and feed conversion ratio were lowest in group D with the poorest growth performance.
 

Table 2: The difference of growth performance of broilers from day 35 to 42 in different groups.


        
In Table 2, there were big differences in the growth performances of broilers even though they were the same breed and were fed the same diet under the same conditions. Broilers with high body weight showed higher feed conversion ratios than those with lower body weights. Similar results were reported by Stanley et al., (2012), who demonstrated that the composition or proportion of cecal microbiota and metabolites are different among different growth performance broilers.
        
All groups of different weight broilers harbored diverse lineages of bacterial phyla. A total of 10 phyla were detected in all groups: Bacteroides, Firmicutes, Tenericutes, Verrucomicrobia, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Syner- gistetes, Cyanobacteria and Lentisphaerae (Fig 1). The predominate phyla were Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, followed by Proteobacteria and Tenericutes in groups A, B and C. However, Verrucomicrobia was the third most  abundant phylum behind phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in group D. The proportions of phyla Bacteroidetes in group C and Firmicutes in group D were lower than those in other groups. Only trace amounts of Fusobacteria were detected in groups C and D.
 

Fig 1: Relative abundance of microbial communities at phylum level of broilers.


        
At the genus level, a total of 89 genera were detected among the four groups and the abundances of genera in the top 10 are listed in Fig 2. Sequences that could not be classified into any known genus were named as unknown. The predominate genus was Alistipes followed by Barensiella and Bacteroides. Significant relative abundances of genera in the four groups of different weight broilers are listed in Table 3. Genus Parabacteroides in groups B and D was significantly higher than that in groups A and C. Genus Coprobacter was higher in groups A and B; however, genus Barnesiella was the most abundant when compared with the other groups (P<0.05). The proportions of genera Streptococcus and Blautia in group A were larger than in groups B, C and D, respectively (P < 0.05). The abundances of genera Incertae Sedis and Subdoligranulum in group C were the highest and were significantly higher than those in group A (P < 0.05) and genus Anaerofilum in group C was higher than in the other groups. Genera Ruminococcus in group A, Escherichia-Shigella in group D and Streptococcus in group C were significantly higher than those in group B (P < 0.05).
 

Fig 2: Relative abundance of microbial community at genus level of broilers.


 

Table 3: Relative abundance of genera level that were significantly affected of the four groups.


        
Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were found to be the predominate phyla among all the tested samples and made up more than 90% of the cecal microbiota. Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes are known to utilize complex carbohydrates and produce short-chain fatty acids, which provide energy and regulate metabolism (Benítez-Paezet_al2016; Pieper et al., 2012). In Fig 1, the abundances of phyla Bacteroidetes in group C and Firmicutes in group D were the lowest when compared with other groups. Fusobacteria were detected in groups C and D and this phylum is widely pathogenic to other vertebrates (Gupta and Sethy 2014). It is likely that high concentrations of phyla Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes in the cecum contributed to increased broiler weight, but phylum Fusobacteria had the opposite effect. Human study has shown that the ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes is correlated with weight (Ley et al., 2005). However, there was no significant correlation between weight and the Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio in the present study, even though the broilers showed significantly different growth performances. And there was no significant difference in abundances among groups at the phylum level, while the compositions of Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria at the genus level were altered in different groups. Not all proportions of the same genus changed consis- tently with increasing or decreasing of weights of broilers.
        
Principle component analysis (PCA) score plots of the four groups of cecum samples are shown in Fig 3. Each dot stands for a sample and the sample C-6 was removed since it was outside of the 95% confidence interval. Based on the PCA results and the OPLS-DA plots of the cecum metabolomic  data, there were clear separations between groups A and C, groups A and D, groups B and C, groups B and D and groups C and D, respectively, which were related to four KEGG pathways: carbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism, amino acid metabolism and other metabolic pathway.
 

Fig 3: PCA score plots of different groups and each dot stands for a cecal sample of four groups.


        
A total of 10 metabolic candidates were identified among the four different groups and are shown in Table 4. For carbohydrate metabolism, the concentration of D-mannose in group C increased by 2.99-fold compared with group A (P = 0.05). The concentrations of hexadecanoic acid and cholesterol, which are related to lipid metabolism, were increased by 1.42- to 2.23-fold in group D compared with groups A and B (P < 0.05). The concentrations of L-leucine and L-valine in groups C and D were significantly increased, respectively, compared with group A (P < 0.05). The concen- trations of glutamic acid, glucopyranose and α-D-allopyranose in group C were higher than those in group A, and α-D-allopyranose increased by 7.87-fold compared with group B (P < 0.05). The concentration of phosphoric acid in group D was significantly higher than that in group A (P < 0.01). The concentration of butanedioic acid in group D was increased by 3.89-fold and 2.76-fold compared with groups B and C, respectively (P < 0.01).
 

Table 4: Different cecum metabolites among the different groups.


        
In the current study, metabolomic profiling was used to investigate the impact of growth performance on broiler cecum metabolites. As a result, energy, amino acids and other metabolic factors were significantly changed with changing weight. The increased D-mannose in the cecum of group D may have been caused by disturbed carbohydrate metabolism so that it was not absorbed by the host. Lipid metabolism is closely associated with the growth performance (Zhao et al., 2007). Besides carbohydrate and lipid pathways, amino acid metabolism pathways, such as for L-valine and L-leucine, were implicated. Valine has been proposed to be the 4th limiting amino acid (Tavernari et al., 2013) and Ferreira et al., (2016) reported that the body weight gain of broilers increased with increasing digestible valine intake. The present results showed that 10 significantly changed metabolites were more enriched in the lower growth performance groups (groups C and D) than in the best growth performance group (group A), which is consistent with the findings of Zhou et al., (2016), who reported that most colonic compounds of carbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism and amino acid metabolism are more enriched in a low protein diet group (lower growth performance) when compared with a normal protein diet group (higher growth performance). The current results indicated that broilers with poor performance might have restricted energy, amino acids and other metabolic pathways in the cecum, which might influence the absorption of dietary nutrition.
We find that chickens with higher growth performance contain microorganisms and metabolites that contribute to more efficient performance, while those with lower growth performance have negatively influenced nutrition digestibility.

  1. Ali, N., Akram, M., Fahim, A., Singh, B., Imran, M. (2018). Effect of dietary supplementation of vitamin E, zinc and chromium supplementation on growth performance and hematological characteristics of broiler chickens. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 52: 574-578.

  2. Benítez-Paez, A., Del Pulgar, E.M.G., Kjølbæk, L., Brahe, L.K., Astrup, A., Larsen, L., Sanz, Y. (2016). Impact of dietary fiber and fat on gut microbiota re-modeling and metabolic health. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 57:201-212.

  3. Biswas, A., Messam, R., Kumawat, M., Namit, M, Mandal, A.B., Mir, N.A. (2018). Effects of prebiotics on intestinal histo-morphometry and gut microflora status of broiler chickens. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 52: 1-5.

  4. Brake, J., Faust, M.A., Stein, J. (2003). Evaluation of transgenic event bt11 hybrid corn in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 82: 551-559.

  5. Butler, V.L., Mowbray, C.A., Cadwell, K., Niranji, S.S., Bailey, R., Watson K.A., Ralph, J., Hall, J. (2016). Effects of rearing environment on the gut antimicrobial responses of two broiler chicken lines. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 178: 29-36.

  6. Clench, M.H. and Mathias J.R. (1995). The Avian Cecum: A Review. Wilson Bulletin, 107: 93-121.

  7. Ghosh, S., Majumder, D., Goswami R. (2012). Broiler performance at different stocking density. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 46: 381-384.

  8. Lumpkins, B.S., Batal, A.B., Lee, M. (2008). The effect of gender on the bacterial community in the gastrointestinal tract of broilers. Poultry Science, 87: 964-967.

  9. Ferreira, N.T., Albuquerque, R.D., Sakomura, N.K., Dorigam, J.C.D.P., Silva, E.P.D., Burbarelli, M.F.C., Ferreira, J.G., Gous, R.M. (2016). The response of broilers during three periods of growth to dietary valine. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 214: 110-120.

  10. Gupta, R.S. and Sethi, M. (2014). Phylogeny and molecular signatures for the phylum fusobacteria and its distinct subclades. Anaerobe, 28: 182-198.

  11. Korver, D.R., Zuidhof, M.J., Lawes, K.R. (2004). Performance characteristics and economic comparison of broiler chickens fed wheat- and triticale-based diets. Poultry Science, 83: 716-725.

  12. Ley, R.E., Bäckhed, F., Turnbaugh, P., Lozupone, C.A., Knight, R.D., Gordon, J.I. (2005). Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102: 11070-11075.

  13. NRC. (1994). Nutrient Requirements of Poultry, 9th ed. National Research Council. The National Academies Press, Washington.

  14. Pieper, R., Kröger, S., Richter, J.F., Wang, J., Martin, L., Bindelle, J., Htoo, J.K., et al. (2012). Fermentable fiber ameliorates fermentable protein-induced changes in microbial ecology, but not the mucosal response, in the colon of piglets. Journal of Nutrition, 142: 661-667.

  15. Stanley, D., Denman, S.E., Hughes, R.J., Geier, M.S., Crowley, T.M., Chen, H., Haring V.R., Moore, R.J. (2012). Intestinal microbiota associated with differential feed conversion efficiency in chickens. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 96: 1361-1369.

  16. Tavernari, F.C., Lelis, G.R., Vieira, R.A., Rostagno, H.S., Albino, L.F.T., Neto, A.R.O. (2013). Valine needs in starting and growing cobb (500) broilers. Poultry Science, 92: 151-157.

  17. Zhao, S., Ma, H., Zou, S., Chen, W. (2007). Effects of in ovo administration of dhea on lipid metabolism and hepatic lipogenetic genes expression in broiler chickens during embryonic development. Lipids, 42: 749-757.

  18. Zhou, L., Fang, L., Sun, Y., Su, Y., Zhu, W. (2016). Effects of the dietary protein level on the microbial composition and metabolomic profile in the hindgut of the pig. Anaerobe, 38: 61-69. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)