There is no statistical differences among all groups in body mass index parameters (Table 1, p>0.05), but positively and statististically significant correlations were observed. Especially in group SP-1, the lower dose, the positive correlations were determined between body weight and height (r: 0.821; p:0.004), body weight and BMI (r: 0.891; p:0.001), body weight and abdominal fat weight (r: 0.644; p:0.045), height and BMI(r: 0.891; p:0.001), height and abdominal fat weight(r:0.695; p:0.026), and WC and abdominal fat weight (r: 0.770; p:0.009). In group SP-2, the positively significantly correlation were found between body weight and heigth (r: 0,677; p: 0,045), and BMI and WHtR (r: 0,716; p:0,003). Nevertheless, there were no significant changes in the liver weight, serum cholesterol level, concentration of serum ALT and AST enzymes and ALT/ AST ratio as shown in Table 2 (p>0.05). Also, there were no statistically differences found in histopathologic changes of the liver tissue (balloon degeneration, sinusoidal congestion, active cupper cells, sinusoidal dilatation, karyolysis, karyorrhexis and caryopictypnosis; Table 3, p>0.05).
S.platensis have been known as an important source and a lot of studies have been performed about the effect on life quality
(Connor et al., 2007; Park et al., 2008; Khanna et al., 2016). For a good health, body weight and abdominal fat distribution are important as well as dietary fat composition. Also, WC and WHtR have shown better association between central obesity. This study was designed to investigate the association of different indices of metabolic adverse outcomes (BMI, WC and WHtR, abdominal fat) with natural additive
S. platensis. Although there were no differences among all these parameters in all groups, the positive and statistically correlation were determined among all groups and parameters especially between body weight and abdominal fat weight in group SP-1, the lower dose. Both of the body weight and abdominal fat weight parameters were lowered when 500 mg/kg dose
S.platensis given. Besides that, there were found the statistically positive corelation between WC and abdominal fat weight in group SP-1 and also WHtR and BMI in group SP-2. Belong to these results, if considered as the only indicator of body fat distrubiton parameters are WC and WHtR, either the high dose or low dose of
S.platensis may affect on the life quality positively. This interesting result was pointed out that calibrating the dose of natural additives was assesing link between body condition and life quality. Also, it suggested that optimal dose of dietary requirement was important, and it was necessary to evaluate the aspect of
S. platensis.
Nevertheless, studies demonstrated that there was a strong association between abdominal fat weight, liver injury and liver enzmyes and so cholesterol metabolism
(Adams et al., 2005; Malhi and Gores, 2008). Todays, for this reason, researchers attended to study on protection and regulation effects of natural additives on health.
S.platensis is one of the best natural foods which is desired in life quality due to its inhibition effect on cholesterol metabolism (Nagaoka
et al., 2005;
Colla et al., 2008). S.platensis contents phycocyanin and polyunsaturated fatty acids which have an important role on serum lipid profiles
(Kato et al., 1984; Colla et al., 2008; Seyidoglu and Galip 2014). Some researchers reported that diet with
S.platensis had significant inhibiton for serum total cholesterol due to its effect on both jejeunal absorption and ileal reabsorption in rats
(Kato et al., 1984; Nagaoka et al., 2005; Miridha et al., 2010). At the same time, average values of some liver enzmyes named ALT and AST were detected for cholesterol metabolism. Because these enzymes are located intracellulary in liver, kidney and heart. If there is a damage situation in these tissues, these enzmyes levels in the blood were increased. However, in our study, no differences were found in abdominal fat weight, serum cholesterol and liver enzmyes. It was suggested that both the doses of
S.platensis have no adverse effect on the cell of vital organs and cholesterol metabolism. These results agreed with results of some researchers
(Moreira et al., 2011; Sixabela et al., 2011).
The hepatoprotective effects of
S.platensis were reported by some
researchers(Pardhasaradhi et al., 2003; Karadeniz et al., 2009). Pardhasaradhi et al., (2003) determined the protective effect of
S.platensis on induced rat with hepatic degeneration and fibrosis. Similary in our study, it was reported that daily 1500mg/kg oral dose of
S.platensis has any toxic effect on hepatic tissue
(Karadeniz et al., 2009). However, some researchers identified the negative effects of this natural additive in human health
(Araújo
et_al2003;
Malhi and Gores, 2008). In these studies, it was suggested that more protein uptake due to
S.platensis content causes gout or hepatic diseases. Although any negative effects were specified for
S.platensis, there is not much information about the effects on systemic toxicity. In our study, no negative and unfavorable results were found when the histopathological staining of the liver was evaluated and there were no statisticaly differences among all groups.