Growth performance of South African Mutton Merino lambs
Table 2 presents the results on average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR). Significant (P<0.05) protein supplement source´level of inclusion interactions was detected for: ADFI and ADG. The ADFI for lambs fed diets supplemented with 10% BSC, 15% BSC, and 10% MOC were similar (P>0.05). However, lambs fed 15% BSC and 10% MOC supplemented diets consumed significantly more (P<0.05) feed than lambs on the 15% MOC supplemented diet. Feed consumption by lambs fed the 10% BSC supplemented diet was similar (P>0.05) to that of lambs on the 15% MOC supplemented diet.
The differences in ADFI in this study may be due to the difference in ether extracts content of the four diets (Table 1). The higher ether extracts content of feed negatively affect daily feed intake in Awassi lambs
(Haddad and Younis, 2004). Contrary to the findings of the current study, Acheampong-
Boateng et al., (2008) reported that the inclusion level of MOC in diets of feedlot cattle did not affect daily feed intake of the cattle. The differences could be attributed to species differences.
Contrary to the findings of the current study on BSC inclusion in lamb diets,
Madzimure et al., (2011) reported that BSC inclusion beyond 5% in the diets of lactating dairy cows reduced daily feed intake. Similar findings were reported by
Belewu and Ibikunle (2009).
The ADG of lambs in this study mirrored the feed consumption patterns as reported in Table 2. The differences in ADG in the present study may be attributed to the differences in ADFI. Feed intake is positively related to body weight gain
(McDonald et al., 2011). The lambs on BSC diets and those on 10% MOC diets performed much better than those on 15% MOC. Least performance by lambs associated on the 15% MOC diet may be attributed to low ADFI of these animals. However, contrary to our findings,
Acheampong-Boateng et al., (2017) reported that MOC inclusion in lamb diets do not affect ADG.
Similar findings to those of the current study were reported by
Ilori et al., (2013) who indicated that inclusion of whole Baobab seed meal in WAD goat diets did not affect ADG. However,
Belewu and Ibikunle (2009) observed reduced ADG as the content of BSC was increased in lamb diets.
Madzimure et al., (2011) reported a reduction on milk production when BSC was increased in dairy cows diet.
The non- significant differences in FCR in the present study was consistent with the findings of several researchers
(Souza et al., 2013; Beken and Sahin, 2011; Nkosi et al., 2011; Belewu and Ibikunle, 2009; Koyuncu, 2008) who reported that FCR was not affected by diets.
Contrary to the results of this study on MOC, in a similar study,
Acheampong-Boateng et al., (2008/2017) reported a significant difference in FCR values among the treatments. Similar findings were reported by
Shirima et al., (2014).
Inclusion levels for both MOC and BSC did not have any significant effect on ADFI, ADG and FCR values. The better growth performance of male lambs compared to their female compatriots in the current study is in agreement with the findings of
Sen et al., (2011) and
Kashani and Bahari (2017) who found that male lambs out-perform their female counterparts in terms of growth.
Carcass characteristics of South African mutton merino lambs
Table 3 presents results for carcass characteristics of lambs. The significant (P<0.05) diet x inclusion level interaction for warm and cold carcass traits can be explained by a differences in response by the two traits to increased levels of the two protein sources. When BSC was increased in the diet carcass mass increased whereas an increase in MOC resulted in a decrease in carcass mass.
The results on carcass characteristics show that lambs fed with 10% BSC, 15% BSC and 15% MOC supplemented diets had similar (P>0.05) warm and cold carcass mass (WCM and CCM respectively). Lambs fed with 15% BSC and 10% MOC supplemented diets had similar (P>0.05) WCM and CCM. However, lambs fed with 10% MOC supplemented diet had significantly (P<0.05) heavier WCM and CCM than the lambs fed 15% MOC and 10% BSC supplemented diets.
Acheampong-Boateng et al., (2017/2008) reported similar findings when MOC was included in lamb and cattle diets. Similar findings were also reported by
Shirima et al., (2014) and
Mioc et al., (2007).
Diets did not significantly affect (P>0.05) dressing percentage (DP), carcass length (CL), fat thickness (FT) and rib eye area (REA). Similar findings on DP were reported by
Acheampong-Boateng et al., (2008), Koyuncu (2008) and
Ustuner et al., (2012). However, contrary to his earlier findings
(Acheampong-Boateng et al., 2008) and those of the current study,
Acheampong-Boateng et al., (2017) working with South African Mutton Merino lambs reported that DP was significantly influenced by the addition of MOC in lambs’ diets. The non-significant differences in carcass length found in this study were similar to the report of
Macome et al., (2011). Results on CL contradicted the findings of
Acheampong-Boateng et al., (2017). The results on fat thickness of this study were similar to the findings of
Flakemore et al., (2015). The non-significant differences in the rib eye area in the present study are similar to the findings of
Flakemore et al., (2015), Ustuner et al., (2012) and
Koyuncu (2008). Acheampong-
Boateng et al., (2017) reported significant difference in rib eye area of the carcass which was contrary to the current findings.
The results of the carcass characteristics of lambs in the current study indicated that carcasses from male lambs had heavier (P<0.05) WCM, CCM and CL, than carcasses from their female counterparts. The carcasses of female lambs had thicker (P<0.05) FT than the carcasses of male lambs. Sex did not significantly affect DP and REA of the carcasses (P>0.05). The superior carcass characteristics of male lambs in the current study over their female counterparts agree with the findings of
Sen et al., (2011).