Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 45 issue 4 (december 2011) : 318 - 321

EFFECT OF EFFECTIVE MICRO-oRGANISM (PROBIOTICS) TECHNOLOGY ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF BROILER

T.R. Walkunde, S.B. Adangale, A.R. Deshmukh
1Department of Animal Science and Dairy Science Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri-413 722, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Walkunde T.R., Adangale S.B., Deshmukh A.R. (2024). EFFECT OF EFFECTIVE MICRO-oRGANISM (PROBIOTICS) TECHNOLOGY ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF BROILER. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 45(4): 318 - 321. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The effect of Effective Micro-organism Technology on the growth performance of broiler was studied. The Effective Micro-organisms (probiotic) culture included strains of lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus) and other organisms such as, bifidobacterium, yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Two hundred, day old, broiler chicks of ‘Vencobb-300’ strain were randomly distributed into four treatments of 50 chicks with five replicates of 10 chicks in each treatment on similar body weight basis. The experimental chicks were fed with EM culture viz. T0 Standard broiler ration without EM culture i.e. Probiotics (control),T1 Standard broiler ration with 0.025 per cent EM culture (Probiotics) (250 g/ton of feed),T2 Standard broiler ration with 0.050 per cent EM culture (Probiotics) (500 g/ton of feed),T3 Standard broiler ration with 0.075 per cent EM culture (Probiotics) (750 g/ton of feed). The higher body weight, weight gain (504.40 g) was observed in treatment T1 followed by T3, T2 and control. It showed that treatment T1 was significantly (P

REFERENCES

  1. Bhatt, R.S.et al(1995). Indian J. poult. Sci., 30 (2) : 117-121.
  2. Baindya, N. et al. (1994). Indian J. Poult. Sci., 29(3):218-231.
  3. Buche, A.V. (1990). M.V.Sc. Thesis, MAU, Parbhani.
  4. Crawford, J.S. (1979).Proceedings of the Arkansas Nutrition Conference, Oct. 2 to 5 Arkansas, U.S.A., pp 45-55.
  5. Jin, L.Z.et al. (1997. World’s Poultry Sci. J., 53(4):351-368
  6. Katoch, S.et al (1996). Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 13(4):197-203.
  7. Mali, S.S. (1998). M.V.Sc. Thesis, MAU, Parbhani.
  8. Panda, A.K. (2002). Poultry Line, January,2002, 26-27.
  9. Pandey, K.B. (1995). M.V.Sc. Thesis, MAU, Parbhani.
  10. Saha, S.K; et al (1999). Indian Vet. J., 76 : 169-170.
  11. Santosh Kumar, B. et al (2003). Indian Vet. J., 80:52-55.
  12. Sarkar, S; et al (1996). Indian Vet. J., 73(2):224-226.
  13. Singh, S; et al (1996). Proc. XXth World’s Poult. Cong., New Delhi, 4:251.
  14. Snedecor, G.W; and W.G. Cochran (1967) Statistical Methods, 6th Edn., The Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.
  15. Takalikar, D.A; et al (1992a).Poult. Guide, 29 (6) : 45-47.
  16. Takalikar, D.A; et al (1992b).Poult. Guide, 29(8):29-30.
  17. Upendra, H.A. and S. Yathiraj (2003). Indian Vet. J. 80 : 1075-1077.
  18. Watkins, B.A.; et al (1982). Poult. Sci., 61:1298-1308.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)