Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.44

  • SJR .282 (2022)

  • Impact Factor .427 (2022)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus


Pragya Bhadauria*1, A.K.S. Tomar, Y.S. Jadoun1, S.S. Bhadauria2
  • Email
1Department of Livestock Production & Management, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly - 243 114, India.
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Bhadauria*1 Pragya, Tomar A.K.S., Jadoun1 Y.S., Bhadauria2 S.S. (2023). SELECTION OF BREEDABLE FEMALES VRINDAVANI CATTLE BY USING DIFFERENT DAM EVALUATION METHODS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 45(2): 120 - 124. doi: .
A study was conducted on Vrindavani cattle at Cattle and Buffalo Farm, I.V.R.I., Izatnagar (India), from 1999-2010 to evaluate the efficacy of different dam evaluation methods. The methods tried were Best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP), Single trait selection (STS), Expected breeding value (EBV) and Most probable producing ability (MPPA). Rank correlations among the four methods of dam evaluation showed significantly high degree of association (Pall four methods can be efficiently use for dam evaluation.
  1. Ashmawy, A.A. (1991). Repeatability of productive traits in Egyptian Buffaloes. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 108: 182.
  2. Belonsky, G.M. and Kennedy, B.W. (1988). Selection on individual phenotype and best linear unbiased prediction of breeding value in a closed swine herd. J. Anim. Sci., 66: 1124- 113.
  3. Chyr, S.C., Freeman A.E. and Berger J. (1979). Estimation of milk producing ability of Holstein cow. J. Dairy Sci., 62: 1774.
  4. GOI (2006). 17th Livestock Census Reports, Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries. Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi.
  5. Grases, H.W. (1982). Application of various models of BLUP estimation of breeding value to German Brown cow in Wurttembery. Anim. Breed.Abstr. 52 (2):158.
  6. Harvey, W.R. (1990). Least Squares and Maximum Likelihood Computer Program. PC-2 Version, Ohio State Uniersity, Columbus, USA.
  7. Henderson, C.R. (1975). Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a election model. Biometrics. 58 : 1731.
  8. Hintz, R., Everett R.W. and Van Vleck L.D. (1978). Estimation of genetic trends from cow and sire evaluation. J .Dairy Sci., 61: 607.
  9. Jain, J.P. and Malhotra J.C. (1971 a). Comparative study of different methods of indexing sires. Indian.J. Anim Sci., 41 : 1101-1108.
  10. Jain, J.P. and Malhotra J.C. (1971 b). Relative efficiency of different methods of indexing sires. Indian.J. Anim Sci., 41 : 1108 – 1114.
  11. Jain, J.P. and Malhotra J.C. (1980). A note on the computation of variances of two different contemporary daughter average sire indices. Indian.J. Anim Sci., 50 : 911-914.
  12. Khattab, Salah A., Nagib, M. EI Ariain and Hulya, Atil. (2000). Estimation of milk producing ability of Holstein cattle in a commercial herd in Egypt. Pakistan J. Bio. Sci., 3(7): 1076- 1079.
  13. Kuznetsov, V.M. (1995). Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle by the BLUP method. Zootekhniya., 11: 8-15.
  14. Lasley J.F. (1972). Genetics of Livestock Improvement. 2nd edition. Prentice Hall,Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA. 429 pp.
  15. Lush, J.L. (1948). The Genetics of Populations. Mimeo. Iowa State Univ., Ames.
  16. Parmar, O.S. (2002). Consideration in the importance of exotic germplasm of dairy cow. Proceedings of the National Programme on ‘Animal Breeding Technologies for Genetic Improvement of Livestock”, held at Centre for Advanced Studies in animal Genetics and Breeding , Dairy cattle Breeding Division, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal w.e.f.26/12/2001 to 15/1/2002.
  17. Robinson, J.A.B., Wilton, J.W. and Schaeffer, L.R. (1989). Accuracy of selection index and best linear unbiased prediction for within herd selection with asssortive mating of dairy cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 69: 315 – 322.
  18. Schimdt, G.H. and Van Vleck L.D. (1974). Principles of dairy sciences. A series of books in agriculture sciences.
  19. Schaeffer, L.R., Kerr, A. and Burnside, E.B. (1982). Dairy genetic differences for lactation production. Can . J. Anim. Sci., 62 : 323.
  20. Sckotinicki, W.J., Tong, M.A., Sharaby, K.M., Krotch and Johnson, L.P. (1998). Sire and cow evaluation in Brown swiss, Canandienne and milking Shorthon. J. Dairy Sci., 61 : 497.
  21. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1994). Statistical Methods. 8th Edn. Iowa State University Press, USA.
  22. Soliman, A.M., Khalil M.H., Zahed S.M. and E.A. Afifi. (1995). Effectiveness and comparison of the three methods of cow evaluation to improve milk traits of fleckvieh cow. Egyptian. J. Anim. Prod., 32:151.
  23. Willham, R.L. (1977). University Animal Breeding Research. J. Animal Sci., 44 : 303- 306.
  24. Wilcox, C.J., Webb, D.W. and De Lorenza, M.A. (1992). Genetic improvement of dairy cow. Fact sheet DS 75 of the Dairy Production Guide, Florida Cooperative Extension Service as cited from

Editorial Board

View all (0)