Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 45 issue 1 (march 2011) : 67 - 69

COMPARATIVE HISTOLOGICAL STUDY OF CAECUM IN CATTLE, SHEEP AND GOAT

S.D. Kadam, N.S. Bhosle, P.J. Kapadnis
1College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Parbhani - 431 402, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Kadam S.D., Bhosle N.S., Kapadnis P.J. (2024). COMPARATIVE HISTOLOGICAL STUDY OF CAECUM IN CATTLE, SHEEP AND GOAT . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 45(1): 67 - 69. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Comparative histology of the caecum of adult cattle,sheep and goat was studied. Caecum of all three animals consisted of four layers namely tunica mucosa, tela submucosa,tunica muscularis and tunica Serosa. Intestinal glands were mostly located at base region of tunica mucosa . In caecum of goat mucus secreting intestional glands were present in the close vicinity of lamina muscularis and serous secreting glands were present at apical end of tunica mucosa . Tela submucosa was largest in cattle as compared to sheep and  goat. Aggregated lymphatic nodules are present  in caecum of sheep in the vicinity of lamina muscularis. In caecum of goat tunica serosa was a loose connective tissue.

REFERENCES

  1. Bacha, W.J. and Baccha L.M. (2000).Color Atlas of veterinary Histology2nd End. Lippinocott,Willams and Wilkins,Baltimare Maryland:148-149.
  2. Dellmann.H.D.and Brown.B.M.(1987)Text book of Veteinary Histology 3rd Edn Lee and Febiger Philadelphia:209-253.
  3. Estacio,A.C and Maala C.P. (1996) Ultrastructural observations on the caecal mucosa of the Philippine carabao (Bubalis babalis) Abstracts of completed studies,PCC at VPLB College , Laguna.
  4. Getty,R.(1975)Sission and Grossman’s Anatomy of the Domestic Animals Vol. 1. 5th Edn.:739-740,904-908.
  5. Ghosh. R.K.(1998),Primary Veterinary Anatomy,1st Edn.:133-135.
  6. Malla.C.P. and Cumming J.F. (1985).Ultrastructural features of the bovine caecal mucosa .Anatomia Histologia and Embryologia,14(2).
  7. Mukherjee.K.L.(1990)Medical Laboratory Technologies, 3rd Edn.Vol III Tata Mc Graw Hill Publishing Co.Ltd.New Delhi-1111-1199.
  8. Raghavan. D.(1964) Anatomy of the Ox I.C.A.R.Publication, New Delhi:363-370.
  9. Ramkrishna,V and Gadre K.M. (1998) The Systemic Histology 1st Edn.Jaypee brothers,Medical Publisher(p)Ltd.New Delhi:3540.
  10. Singh.U.B.and Sulochana S.(1978) A Laboratory Manual of Histological and Histochemical Technique 1st Edn.Kothari Medical Publishing House ,Parel, Bombay. 35-37, 47-48.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)