Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 46 issue 4 (december 2012) : 393 - 396

COMPARATIVE HISTOMORPHOMETRICAL STUDY ON THE WING MUSCLES OF FIGHTING (ASEEL) AND NON-FIGHTING (KALAHANDI) BIRDS OF ORISSA

B.R. Behera*, R.K. Das, A.K. Mandal, U.K. Mishra, T.K. Palai
1College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, - 751 003, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Behera* B.R., Das R.K., Mandal A.K., Mishra U.K., Palai T.K. (2024). COMPARATIVE HISTOMORPHOMETRICAL STUDY ON THE WING MUSCLES OF FIGHTING (ASEEL) AND NON-FIGHTING (KALAHANDI) BIRDS OF ORISSA. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 46(4): 393 - 396. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A comparative histomorphometrical study between Aseel (Fighting cock) and Kalahandi (Nonfighting cock) was carried out to ascertain anatomical superiority of flight muscles and tendons of Aseel cocks over Kalahandi cock. Qualitatively higher amount of connective tissue and collagen fiber content was found in almost all wing muscles and tendons in case of Aseel than that of Kalahandi cocks. Quantitatively the diameter of the fascicles was larger in case of Aseel cocks than Kalahandi cocks. However; the trend for the number of fascicles per unit area was just reversed. These characteristics might attribute to the fighting ability of Aseel cocks.

REFERENCES

  1. Barrnett, R. I. (1966). Muscular Tissue. Mc Graw-Hill Book Company, New York.
  2. Case, J. and Chilver, A.H. (1971). Strength of Materials and Structures. The English Language Book Society and Edward Arnold Limited, London.
  3. Evans, J.H. and Barbenel, J.C. (1975). Structural and mechanical properties of tendon related to function. Eq. Vet. J., 7 : 1-8.
  4. Humason, G.L. (1962). Animal Tissue Techniques, W.H. Freeman and Co., London.
  5. Luna, G.L. (1968). Manual of Histologic Staining Methods of the Armed Forces Institute Pathology, McGraw-HiH Book Co., New York.
  6. Moussa, M., Swider, P., Babilé, R., Fernandez, X. and Rémignon, H. ( 2008). Effects of physical activities on biochemical and biomechanical properties of tendons in two commercial types of chickens. Connect Tissue Res., 49 :76- 84.
  7. Patterson-kane, J.C., Firth E.C., Goodship, A.E. and Parry, D.A.D. (1997). Age ­related differences in collagen crimp patterns in the superficial digital flexor tendon core region of untrained horses. Aus. Vet. J., 75 : 39-44.
  8. Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. (1989). Statistical Methods, 8th edn. Iowa State University Press.
  9. W’ebbon, P.M. (1978). A histological study of macroscopically normal equine digital flexor tendons. Eq. Vet. J., 10 : 253-259.
  10. Woo, S.L.Y., Glen, A. L., Thoman, J.R. and Edumund, P.Y. (1997). Structure and Function of Tendons and Ligaments. Lippincott­ Raven Publishers, Philadelphia.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)