Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 34 issue 1 (january to june 2000) : 1-10

OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT IN A SLAUGHTER HOUSE: A MACRO-LEVEL CASE STUDY

Niraj. Kumar-, P.N. Kaul
1Div. of Extension Education. Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar - 243 112 India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Kumar- Niraj., Kaul P.N. (2024). OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT IN A SLAUGHTER HOUSE: A MACRO-LEVEL CASE STUDY. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 34(1): 1-10. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The paper is an outcome of an exploratory case study of slaughterhouse which was made to identify and study those extension factors which affect productivity of slaughterhouse. Non-participant observation was the major tool for the data collection and it was substantiated by personal interviews wherever required. Based on the available literature and initial observations all those factors which can reflect on the efficiency and productivity of the slaughterhouse were identified and studied. The findings of the study have been discussed under four heads namely, infrastructure and physical environment, social structural, administrative, workers, and consumers. Findings of this study has brought forth many factors which are important to be addressed for effective extension interventions aimed at bringing desired changes for the better productivity of the organisation and better quality of produce.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. l3avelas, A. (1950) J. Acoustical Soci. Am. 22: 725-730.
    2. Cooke, R.A. and Rousseau, D.M. (1984) Applied Psych010. 69: 252-260.
    3. Cartwright, D.R., and Zander, A. (1968) Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, 2nd Edition,
    4. HiHper and Row, New York.
    5. Donald, M.N. (1959 ) Ph P thesis. University of Michigan, U.S.A.
    6. Editorial (1994), Times 0: ::.1, dt. 07th April' 94, New Delhi.
    7. Greenberg, J. and Baron, R..., i (993) Behaviour in oryanisations, Allyn and Bacon, London.
    8. Jackson,S.E. and Schuler, R.S.( 1985) Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Process
    9. 36: 16-78.
    10. Kaul, P.N.(1981) Media Asia. 8(3):167-170.
    11. Leavitt. H:J. (1951) J. Abnormal Psycholo,46: 3-50.
    12. Mitchell, T. R ,': .d. (1985) J. Applied Pshycho. 70:48-55.
    13. Ramaswamy, N.S.(1994i. Times of India,dt. 04th April '94. New Delhi.
    14. Singh.N. (1994) Nav Bharat Times, 02nd May '94, New Delhi.
    15. Shaw, M.E. (1964) In: Advances in Experimental Social Psycology. Vol.l (L. Berkowitz Ed.)
    16. NewYork, Academic Press. 111-117.
    17. Shaw, M.E. (1978) In: Group Processes (L. Berkowitz Ed.) New York, Academic Press.
    18. Stinchcombe, A.L. (1965) Social Structure and Organisations. In: Handbook of Organisation
    19. (J.G. March. Ed), Rand McNally College Publishing Company Chicago.
    20. Torrance, E.P.(1954) Res. Studies. Washington State College, 22:130-140.
    21. Van 5"1/, M. et al., (1981) Human Relations. 34:43-71.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)