Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 35 issue 1 (january to june 2001) : 10 - 14

IMPACT OF CAMEL PRODUCTION SYSTEM ON THE SUSTAINABILITY OF MARGINAL FARMERS IN HOT ARID VILLAGES OF THAR DESERT

Champak Bhakat, M.S. Sahani
1NRCC, Bikaner - 334001 ,India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Bhakat Champak, Sahani M.S. (2024). IMPACT OF CAMEL PRODUCTION SYSTEM ON THE SUSTAINABILITY OF MARGINAL FARMERS IN HOT ARID VILLAGES OF THAR DESERT. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 35(1): 10 - 14. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A grass root level survey was conducted on various aspects of camelid farming which involved four different zones (north, south, east, west) of Thar desert. The required data were collected in the suitable developed and pre-tested proforma from Raikas of Thar desert. In this region the camel to other herbivore (cattle, buffalo, sheep and goat) ratio was 1:21.36. Among the different camel health disorders, Parasitic mange case was highest. It was followed by Trypanosomiasis, general fever, respiratory infection, other problems like digestive disorders, worm etc. The mortality in camel calf (1 year age) and adult were 33.05±2.63% and 8.10±1.07%, respectively. The average annual productivity of commonly grown. Thar desert crop were 4.89q/ha for guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) and 2.75 q/ha for moth (Phaseolus aconitifolious). The final returns per unit (Rupee) invested was high in case of guar (Rs. 8.36) as compared to Moth (Rs. 2.29). The average cost of rearing of draft camel was low as compared to cattle and buffalo. The final return per unit (Rupee) invested was high in case of camel (Rs. 1.90) as compared to cattle and buffalo (Rs. 1.82) in Thar desert. It is evident thatdue to higher production potential, increase market price and economic advantage guar cultivation for camel farmers is more profitable than moth cultivation and camel rearing is also profitable as compared to other livestock rearing in terms of per unit investment.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Amresh Kumar (1997) Potential linked credit plan National Bank For Agriculture and Rural Development, Bikaner Distt, Bikaner P-21.
    2. FAO (1998) Production Year &ok, Rome, Italy.
    3. Khanna, N.D. etal. (1990) Indiancl. Anim. Sci. 60:331-337.
    4. Khanna, N.D.and Rai, A.K. (1994). Indian Farming 44(3):23-27.
    5. Khanna, N.D.and Rai, A.K.(1990) Indian Farming 40(6):33-35.
    6. Kohler- Rollefson (1992). The Raikas dromedary breeds of Rajasthan: A pastoral system in crisis nomadic people, 30:74-83.
    7. Laval, G. et al. (1997) Bench mark survey of camel keeping in Bikaner and Jaisalmer district of Rajasthan, NRCC, Bikaner, pp-36-49. .
    8. Rama, B.D.et al (1997). Livestock,and wild life management in Indian Arid Ecosystem Book Desertification control in the arid Ecosystem of India forJ·sustaina15le D£velopment : pp327 - 333.
    9. Saley, M. (1993). Survey of draught camel for carting in an.Indian desert towri Blkaner anp investigation on draught performance of Bikaneri Camel. Bikaner,India NRCC,66P. ..
    10. Singh, C.M. (2000). Small holder and conventional system: Important components.of.A -holistic Application of reproduction biotechnology in India. Paper presented at VCI conferen
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)