Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 36 issue 1 (january to june 2002) : 35 - 38

MEAT YIELD AND COOKED MEAT TASTE OF HYBRIDS FROM DIFFERENT GENETIC GROUPS IN A HOT-HUMID CLIMATE

M
M.A. Islam)
G
G. Seeland2
S
S.M. Bulbul
M
M.A.R. Howlider
1Department of Poultry Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Islam) M.A., Seeland2 G., Bulbul S.M., Howlider M.A.R. (2025). MEAT YIELD AND COOKED MEAT TASTE OF HYBRIDS FROM DIFFERENT GENETIC GROUPS IN A HOT-HUMID CLIMATE. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 36(1): 35 - 38. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Sixty males and sixty one females day-old chicken belonging to 9 genetic groups, reared on littered floor were slaughtered at 8 weeks of age to compare meat yield traits. Organoleptic taste of their and shaver tropicbro broiler cooked meat were evaluated to compare the genetic groups on taste basis. The exotic purebreds, and exotic with indigenous crossbreds produced higher meat in winter than in summer. The exotic pure group r*r (392.4 g/bird), and r*n (285g/bird) produced the highest edible meat in both seasons. But r*n group was the best in terms of edible meat yield ratio. The edible meat yield ratio of r*n and r*r in both summer and winter were 34% and 32% respectively. The organoleptic taste value ranked the genetic groups sequentially as d*r, d*d, r*n, d*n, iv*iv, n*n, r*r and r*d.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Adebangjo, A. and OIuyemi, JA (1981). Bllllet. ofAnim.Health and PrcxJ. jn Africa. 29:425-429.
    2. Alam, M5. et al. (1995). Bangladesh J. Anim. Sci. 24(1&2): 173·183.
    3. Barua, A. and Howlider. MAR (1991). IndianJ Anim. Sci.. 61:772-775.
    4. Barua, A. and Yoshimura, Y. (1997). World's POlllt. Sci. J. 53:388-394.
    5. Barua, A. et al. (1998). World's POlllt. Sci.. J. 54:279-286.
    6. Cahaner, A. et al. (1993). POlllt. Sci.: 72:767-775.
    7. Cowan, P.J. and Michie, W. (1978). Blit. POlllt. Sci.. 19(5):601-605.
    8. Gueye, EI Hadji Fallou (1998). World's POlllt. Sci. J, 54:73-86.
    9. Hanjl,. C.J. and Somes, Jr. RG. (1983). Poult. Sci.. 62: 934-941.
    10. Hanzl. C.J. and Somes, Jr. RG. (1983). Poult. Sci., 62:942-946.
    11. Haque, NA (1993). M.Sc. Thesis. Dept. of Poult. Sci.. BAU, Mymensingh
    12. Hermes, T.H. et al. (1984). Ann. Agril. Sci.. Ain-Shams-Universify, 29 281-298.
    13. Horst. P. (1989). Arch. Geflugelk,53:93-101.
    14. Howlider. MAR and Rose. S.P. (1987). World Poult. Sci. J. 43:228-237.
    15. Huque, Q.M.E.. (1996). World's Poult. Congress. New Delhi. India 2-5 Septem.. 1:47-60.
    16. Hussain. M.M. etal. (1991). Bangladesh Veterinarian 8 (1-2): 4-7.
    17. Joseph. J.K. et al. (1992). Bull. ofAnim. Health and PrcxJ. in Ahica. 40:97-102.
    18. Mafeni. Mase Joseph (1995). 1': I.D. thesis in Tropical Animal production. Prince Leopold Institute of Tropical Medicine nDepartment of Tropical Animal Production and Health. Antwerpen. Belgium.
    19. Mahapatra. C.M. et al. (1989). Indian J Anim. Sci. 59: 1562-1564.
    20. Obioha. F.J. et al. (1983). World Review ofAnimal PrcxJuctio{/.. 19:59-64
    21. Paul, B.P. etal. (1990). IndianJ Anim. Sci.. 60:866-868.
    22. Sharma. D. et al. (1995). Indian J Vet. Res. 4:36-43.
    23. Sharma, D.P. et al. (1971). Indian J Anim Sci., 41: 185-9i.
    24. Udaipur PI-480 final technical report (1974). Performance of desi bird and Crossbred progeny
    Published In
    Indian Journal of Animal Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 36 issue 1 (january to june 2002) : 35 - 38

      MEAT YIELD AND COOKED MEAT TASTE OF HYBRIDS FROM DIFFERENT GENETIC GROUPS IN A HOT-HUMID CLIMATE

      M
      M.A. Islam)
      G
      G. Seeland2
      S
      S.M. Bulbul
      M
      M.A.R. Howlider
      1Department of Poultry Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Islam) M.A., Seeland2 G., Bulbul S.M., Howlider M.A.R. (2025). MEAT YIELD AND COOKED MEAT TASTE OF HYBRIDS FROM DIFFERENT GENETIC GROUPS IN A HOT-HUMID CLIMATE. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 36(1): 35 - 38. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Sixty males and sixty one females day-old chicken belonging to 9 genetic groups, reared on littered floor were slaughtered at 8 weeks of age to compare meat yield traits. Organoleptic taste of their and shaver tropicbro broiler cooked meat were evaluated to compare the genetic groups on taste basis. The exotic purebreds, and exotic with indigenous crossbreds produced higher meat in winter than in summer. The exotic pure group r*r (392.4 g/bird), and r*n (285g/bird) produced the highest edible meat in both seasons. But r*n group was the best in terms of edible meat yield ratio. The edible meat yield ratio of r*n and r*r in both summer and winter were 34% and 32% respectively. The organoleptic taste value ranked the genetic groups sequentially as d*r, d*d, r*n, d*n, iv*iv, n*n, r*r and r*d.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Adebangjo, A. and OIuyemi, JA (1981). Bllllet. ofAnim.Health and PrcxJ. jn Africa. 29:425-429.
        2. Alam, M5. et al. (1995). Bangladesh J. Anim. Sci. 24(1&2): 173·183.
        3. Barua, A. and Howlider. MAR (1991). IndianJ Anim. Sci.. 61:772-775.
        4. Barua, A. and Yoshimura, Y. (1997). World's POlllt. Sci. J. 53:388-394.
        5. Barua, A. et al. (1998). World's POlllt. Sci.. J. 54:279-286.
        6. Cahaner, A. et al. (1993). POlllt. Sci.: 72:767-775.
        7. Cowan, P.J. and Michie, W. (1978). Blit. POlllt. Sci.. 19(5):601-605.
        8. Gueye, EI Hadji Fallou (1998). World's POlllt. Sci. J, 54:73-86.
        9. Hanjl,. C.J. and Somes, Jr. RG. (1983). Poult. Sci.. 62: 934-941.
        10. Hanzl. C.J. and Somes, Jr. RG. (1983). Poult. Sci., 62:942-946.
        11. Haque, NA (1993). M.Sc. Thesis. Dept. of Poult. Sci.. BAU, Mymensingh
        12. Hermes, T.H. et al. (1984). Ann. Agril. Sci.. Ain-Shams-Universify, 29 281-298.
        13. Horst. P. (1989). Arch. Geflugelk,53:93-101.
        14. Howlider. MAR and Rose. S.P. (1987). World Poult. Sci. J. 43:228-237.
        15. Huque, Q.M.E.. (1996). World's Poult. Congress. New Delhi. India 2-5 Septem.. 1:47-60.
        16. Hussain. M.M. etal. (1991). Bangladesh Veterinarian 8 (1-2): 4-7.
        17. Joseph. J.K. et al. (1992). Bull. ofAnim. Health and PrcxJ. in Ahica. 40:97-102.
        18. Mafeni. Mase Joseph (1995). 1': I.D. thesis in Tropical Animal production. Prince Leopold Institute of Tropical Medicine nDepartment of Tropical Animal Production and Health. Antwerpen. Belgium.
        19. Mahapatra. C.M. et al. (1989). Indian J Anim. Sci. 59: 1562-1564.
        20. Obioha. F.J. et al. (1983). World Review ofAnimal PrcxJuctio{/.. 19:59-64
        21. Paul, B.P. etal. (1990). IndianJ Anim. Sci.. 60:866-868.
        22. Sharma. D. et al. (1995). Indian J Vet. Res. 4:36-43.
        23. Sharma, D.P. et al. (1971). Indian J Anim Sci., 41: 185-9i.
        24. Udaipur PI-480 final technical report (1974). Performance of desi bird and Crossbred progeny
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Indian Journal of Animal Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)