Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak
Print ISSN 0367-6722
Online ISSN 0976-0555
NAAS Rating 6.50
SJR 0.263
Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :

Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)

Indexing Services :

Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 36 issue 1 (january to june 2002) : 12 - 16

GENETIC AND NON-GENETIC FACTORS AFFECTING .ltit GROWTH PERFORMANCE IN GOATS

Satbir Singh, Z.S. Rana, 0.5. Dalal

Affiliations

¹Department of Animal Breeding, CCSHaryana Agricultural University, Hisar· 125004, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Singh Satbir, Rana Z.S., Dalal 0.5. (2024). GENETIC AND NON-GENETIC FACTORS AFFECTING .ltit GROWTH PERFORMANCE IN GOATS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 36(1): 12 - 16. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Data on 616 kids of Beetal, Black Bengal and their reciprocal crosses were analysed to study the effect of genetic group, year, season, sex, type of birth and dam's weight at kidding on growth traits. The results revealed that Beetal breed was significantly (P0.01) superior in body weights and daily body weight gains and Black Bengal had minimum body weights at all ages. All the body weights were significantly influenced by genetic group, year, sex and type of brith. The dam's weight at kidding was also found to b significant for all the body weights suggesting the already established fact that the dams which are heavier during pregnancy and at kidding would deliver heavier kids. The effect of genetic group, year, season and sex were found to be significant for daily body weight gains.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Gracia, B.a. et al. (1996). Revista Caprinos la Facultad de Agronomia. Universidad del Zulia, 13: 443-455.
Harvey, W.R. (1987). Least squares analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers AR5- USDA.
Jagtap, 0.2. et al. (1990). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 60:739-742.
Kremer, CY. (1957). Biometrics 13:13-18.
Malik, C.P. eta!. (1986). Anim. Prod. 43:178-182.
Mathew, S. etal. (1994). Curro Res. Univ. Agric. Sci., 23 (7-8):84-86.
Mitial, J.P. and Pandey, M.D. (1978). Indian Vet. J. 55:470-474.
Rana, 2.S. (1980). Ani. Breed. Abstr., 48:6069.
Rana, 2.S. and Godara, P. (1991). Indian J. Anim. Prod. Mgmt. 7: 161.
Rasali, D.P. and Khanal, R.C. (1998). Lumle Agricultural Research Centre working paper - Lumle Agricultural Research Centre No.98fl, pp.9.
Raza, S.H. et al. (1998). Asian A us. J. Anim. Sci., 11(2): 152-154.
Singh, OK et al. (1990). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 60(3):375-377.
Sinha, NK (1982). In: Seminar on Meat Production Sheep and Goat held at Raymond Farm, Dhule, India from 12th to 14th June 1982.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

GENETIC AND NON-GENETIC FACTORS AFFECTING .ltit GROWTH PERFORMANCE IN GOATS

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board