Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak
Print ISSN 0367-6722
Online ISSN 0976-0555
NAAS Rating 6.50
SJR 0.263
Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :

Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)

Indexing Services :

Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 37 issue 2 (july to december 2003) : 89 - 92

SKIN FOLUCLES AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH WOOL CHARACTERISTICS OF NILGIRI, MERINO AND ITS CROSSES·

K. Suresh Kumar, S. Arunachalam, T. Sivakumar, V. Ramesh andM.R. Muralidharan

Affiliations

¹Department of Uvestock Production and Management, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai - 600 007, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Kumar Suresh K., Arunachalam S., Sivakumar T., Muralidharan andM.R. Ramesh V. (2024). SKIN FOLUCLES AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH WOOL CHARACTERISTICS OF NILGIRI, MERINO AND ITS CROSSES·. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 37(2): 89 - 92. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A study on skin follicles and its relationship with wool characteristics of Nilgiri, Merino and its crosses was carried out. Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant (P0.01) negative correlation between S/P ratio and fibre diameter in Nilgiri and Merino, but Nilgiri × Merino had a non-significant negative correlation. A highly significant (P.01) positive correlation was found between S/P ratio and fibre length and crimp. In Nilgiri, the total number of follicles had a non-significant negative correlation with fibe diameter, a highly significant (P0.01) positive correlation with crimp. The present study suggested that the selection of fine wool sheep at an earlier stage of post-natal life might be made based on the S/P ratio. It also suggested that the kin follicles and wool characteristics of Nilgiri × Merino were comparatively better than Nilgiri.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Ghanekar, V.M. and Soman BV (1971).lndianJ. Anim. Sci., 41: 675-680.
Hardy, M. and Lyne, A.G. (1956). Aust. J. Agric. Res., 9: 423-441.
Hynd, P.l.n et al. (1996). Wool Tech. Sheep Breed, 44: 167-177.
Jain, RK. eta/. (1989). Indian. J. Anim. Sci., 59: 881-883.
McGlorgy, C.E. (1997). Wool Tech. Sheep Breed, 45: 129-145.
Moore, G.P.M. et al. (1989). Genet. Res., 53: 57-62.
Ramchandran, K.N. and Yeri, PRo (1953).lndianJ. Vet. Sci., 23: 151-162.
Scobie, D.R and Young, S.R (2000). Proc. NZ Soc. Anim. Prod., 60: 162-165

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

SKIN FOLUCLES AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH WOOL CHARACTERISTICS OF NILGIRI, MERINO AND ITS CROSSES·

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board