Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Indian Journal of
Animal Research
Print ISSN: 0367-6722
Online ISSN: 0976-0555
NASS Rating
6.40
SJR
0.233
CiteScore
0.606

Chief Editor:
M. R. Saseendranath
Kerala Veterinary and Animal Science University, Mannuthy, Thrissur, INDIA
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, ...

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 38 issue 2 (july to december 2004) : 85 - 90

SUPPlEMENTATION OF PHYfASEAND CARBOHYDRASE TO PARBOILED RICE POLISH BASED DIET FOR THE GROWfH AND MEAT YIElD OF BROILERS

M.A. Islam!, G. Seeland2, M.A.R. Howlider
1Department of Poultry Science, Bangladesh Agricul!"' oral University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Islam! M.A., Seeland2 G., Howlider M.A.R. (2025). SUPPlEMENTATION OF PHYfASEAND CARBOHYDRASE TO PARBOILED RICE POLISH BASED DIET FOR THE GROWfH AND MEAT YIElD OF BROILERS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 38(2): 85 - 90. doi: .

ABSTRACT

One hundred ninety two day-old Arbor Acres broiler chicks were fed ad libitum of 16 isonitrogenous and isocaloric parboiled rice polish based diets with different combination levels of phytase (0, 740, 1000 and 1250 FYT/kg) and carbohydrase (0, 80, 100 and 120 ppm/kg) up to 42 days of age for, abundant use of parboiled rice polish (PRP) in broiler diet. The growth rate, feed conversion efficiency, survivability, meat yield and profitability were increased with the increased level of mixed enzymes in PRP based diets. Abundant PRP with maximum supplementation of phytase and carbohydrase enzymes showed the highest body weight, meat yield and profitability. Therefore, this study concluded that abundant PRP with phytase and carbohydrase combinations might be used in the diet to improve broiler performance and to have maximum benefit.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Annison, G. and Choct, M. (1991). World's Poult. Sci. J., 47: 232-242.
    2. Azam, G. and Howlider, MAR. (1998). J. Applied Anim. Res., 14: 181-186.
    3. Barbar, SK and Barbe, PK (1980). Poult. Sci., 59: 1012-1017.
    4. Bedford etal. (1995). Poult. Sci., 74: 1571-1577.
    5. Bolton, W. and Blair, R. (1986). Poult. Nutr. Bull. -174. 4th ed. Poult. Res. Centre, Midlothion, Edinburgh.
    6. Eshwaraiah, P.V. Rao and Reddy, C.v. (1986). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 21: 72-74.
    7. Eshwaraiah,P'v. Rao and Reddy, C.V. (1988). Indian J. Anim. Sci" 58: 377-381.
    8. Farrel et al. (1993). J. Anim. Phys. Anim. Nutr., 69: 278-286.
    9. Ferguson etal. (1998). Poult. Sci., 77: 1085-1093.
    10. Houston, D.F. and Kohler. G.O. (1969). National Academy of Science, Washington D.C., USA.
    11. 90 INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH
    12. Howlider, MAR. and Rose, S.P. (1989). British Poult. Sci., 30: 61-67.
    13. Islam et al. (1996). Progr. Agri., 7: 87-91.
    14. Kanaya et al. (1976). Rice Chemistry Technology. 2nd edn. American Association of Cereal Chemists. Inc. S1. Paul.
    15. Minnesota, USA.
    16. Pauda. LB. and Juliano, C.H. (1974). J. Nutr., 104: 2030-2038.
    17. Perreault, NA and Leeson, S. (1987). Poult. Missel., 3: 28-31.
    18. Preston et al. (2000). British Poult. Sci., 41: 324-331.
    19. Puzio, I. (1998). Asian-Austr. J. Anim. Sci., 8: 29-31.
    20. Scott et al. (1976). Nutrition of the chicken. 2nd edn. M.L. Scott Associates, Ithaca, New York.
    21. Singh, K.S. and Panda, B. (1992). Poultry Nutrition. Kalyani Publishers, 1/1, RajinderNagar, Ludhiana-141008,India.
    22. Shivaji et al. (1983). J. Sci. Food Agri., 34: 743-788.
    23. Warren, B.F. and Parrel, D.C. (1990). Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 27: 229-246.
    24. Wiseman, J. (1987). Feeding of Non-ruminar.t Uvestock, Butterworths, London. 10.
    25. Zyla et a:. (1999). J. Sci. Food Agric., 79: 1841-1848.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)