Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.5 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 38 issue 2 (july to december 2004) : 79·84

EFFECf OF CARRAGEENAN AND SODIUM ALGINATE ON PROCESSING AND SENSORY QUAlifY OF LOW-FAT GROUND PORK PATrIES

Manish Kumarl, B.D.Sharma, R.B.Sharmal, Sushi! Kumar2
1Division of Livestock Products Technology, NRI - Bareilly, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Kumarl Manish, B.D.Sharma, R.B.Sharmal, Kumar2 Sushi! (2024). EFFECf OF CARRAGEENAN AND SODIUM ALGINATE ON PROCESSING AND SENSORY QUAlifY OF LOW-FAT GROUND PORK PATrIES. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 38(2): 79·84. doi: .
Low-fat ground pork patties (10% total fat), formulated wth 15% water, 4% added fat, 1.5% salt and different combination of carrageenan and sodium alginate (group I carrageenan 0.75% + sodium alginate 0.1%; group II carrageenan 0.50% + sodium alginate 0.2%; group III carrageenan 0.25% + sodium alginate 0.3%), were evaluated for proximate composition, processing and sensory characteristics and compared with control patties with 15% added fat. The moisture content of raw and cooked lowfat patties was significantly (P0.05) higher than control patties. Cooking yield, fat and moisture retention improved significantly (p0.05) in all the three combination groups from the control product. The dimensions of low-fat pattieswere maintained better than high-fat patties. The shear force value of group I was comparable to control, however, it increased with increase in added level of sodium alginate in the formulation. The calorie content was reduced by 35–37% in low-fat patties. The flavour and texture sores followed a declining trend with increase in sodium alginate in the formulation. The sensory quality along with overall acceptability was highest for group I and comparable to high-fat control patties.
    1. AOAC (1995). Official Methods ofAnalysis. 16th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C.
    2. Beny, B.W and Stiffler, D.M. (1981) J Food Sci., 46: 1103-1106.
    3. Bioukas, J.G. et a/. (1997). J. Muscle Foods, 8: 68-78.
    4. Chowdhary, J. etal. (1994). IndianJ. Poultry Sci., 29: 204-206.
    5. El-Magoli, S.B. et a/. (1996). Meat Sci., 42: 179-193.
    6. Huffman, D.L. et aJ. (1992). Cereal Foods World, 37: 439-442.
    7. Keeton, J.T. (1994). Meat Sci., 36: 261-276.
    8. Un, K.W and Keeton, J.T. (1998,. J. Food Sci., 64: 571.
    9. Manish Kumar (2001). Ph.D. Thesis, IVRI, Bareilly.
    10. Means, WJ. et a/. (1987). J. Food Sci., 52: 252-262.
    11. Padda, G.S. et a/. (1985). J. Food Sci. Technol., 22: 362-365.
    12. Park, CK et a/. (2000). J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr., 29: 586-591.
    13. Reitmeier, CA (1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 849 (9), 3526
    14. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, WG. (1989). Statistical Methods, 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
    15. USDA (1973). Meat and Poultry Inspection Reguiation. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
    16. Wallingford, L.W and Labuza, T.P. (1983). J Food Science, 48: 1-5.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)