Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 41 issue 4 (december 2007) : 293-295

EFFECT OF FEEDING UREA TREATED WHEAT STRAW WITH OR WITHOUT SULPHUR ON NITROGEN UTILIZATION AND GROWTH RATE IN CROSSBRED HEIFERS

Lokesh Gupta1, P.C. Murdia
1Department of Animal Production, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur - 313 001, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Gupta1 Lokesh, Murdia P.C. (2024). EFFECT OF FEEDING UREA TREATED WHEAT STRAW WITH OR WITHOUT SULPHUR ON NITROGEN UTILIZATION AND GROWTH RATE IN CROSSBRED HEIFERS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 41(4): 293-295. doi: .
This experiment was conducted on twenty five crossbred heifers randomly divided into five
treatment groups of five animals each. The five treatments were: T1 (Wheat straw), T2 (1.5% urea
treated wheat straw), T3 (1.5% urea plus 0.5% single super phosphate treated wheat straw), T4 (4%
urea ammonia treated wheat straw) and T5 (4% urea ammonia plus 1.5% single super phosphate
treated wheat straw). The average daily nitrogen intake for treatments T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 was
82.82, 91.76, 102.89, 129.59 and 150.18 g/day/animal, respectively. The overall differences in
nitrogen intake between treatments were highly significant (P the difference was statistically significant (P cent of the total nitrogen intake was higher in treatment T5 and the difference was statistically significant (Psed diets has beneficial effect on nitrogen utilization and growth rate in crossbred heifers
    1. A.O.A.C. (1995). Official Methods of Analysis 16th Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C.
    2. Arora, S.P. (1997). Feeding of Dairy Cattle and Buffaloes. ICAR, New Delhi.
    3. Dahiya, S.S. et al. (1998). Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 15: 93-96.
    4. Das, M.M. and Kundu, S.S. (1995). Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 12: 241-244.
    5. Fron, M.J. et al. (1990). J. Anim. Sci., 68: 543-552.
    6. Marwaha, C.L. et al. (1990). Indian J. Dairy Sci., 43: 368-373.
    7. Misra, N.K. et al. (1999). Indian J. Amin. Nutr., 16: 149-154.
    8. Ranjhan, S.K. (1998). Nutrient Requirements of Livestock and Poultry. ICAR, New Delhi.
    9. Saijpaul, S. et al. (1998). Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 15: 179-182.
    10. Singh, M. and Taparia, A.L. (1997). Indian Vet. J., 14 Feb. 128-131.
    11. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1968). Statistical Methods, 6th edition, Oxford and IBH Publication Co., New Delhi.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)