Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 41 issue 2 (june 2007) : 151 - 152

CONNECTIVE TISSUE FIBER ARRANGEMENT OF SKIN IN RED KANDHARI COWS

M
M.B. Hole
N
N.S. Bhosle
P
P.J. Kapadnis
1College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, MAFSU, Parbhani - 431 402, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Hole M.B., Bhosle N.S., Kapadnis P.J. (2025). CONNECTIVE TISSUE FIBER ARRANGEMENT OF SKIN IN RED KANDHARI COWS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 41(2): 151 - 152. doi: .

ABSTRACT

For the present study fifteen female Red Kandhari cattle were used. The skin of the Red
Kandhari cow consisted of epidermis, dermis and hypodermis. The dermis was enmeshed with
collagen, elastic and reticular fibers. The collagen fibers were found thick, coarse and irregularly
distributed in all the three body regions. These fibers were loosely arranged in the papillary
layer but dense arrangement of large bundles of collagen fibers were commonly observed in the
reticular layer of the dermis. The collagen fibers were more developed in lactating cow as
compared to that of non lactating and pregnant Red Kandhari cow.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Amakiri, S.F. (1975). Nigerian Vet. Med. Assoc., 4(1): 21-28.
    2. Bhayni, D.M. and Vyas, K.N. (1991). Indian Vet. J., 68(4): 344-347.
    3. Calhoun, M.L. and Stinson, A.W. (1981). In: Text Book of Veterinary Histology. (Dellmann, H.D. and Brown, E.M.
    4. eds.) K.M. Varghese Company, Bombay, pp. 378-411.
    5. Dellmann, H.D. and Brown, E.M. (1987). Textbook of Veterinary Histology, 3rd Edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp. 382-415.
    6. Dyce, K.M. et al. (1996). Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy, 2nd Edn, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, pp. 349-366.
    7. Fazzini, U. and Peirone, S.M. (1985). Vet. Bull., 55(11): 7484.
    8. Govindaiah, M.G. and Nagaroenkar, R. (1983). Mysore J. Agric. Sci., 17: 371-377.
    9. Leeson, T.S. et al. (1988). Text Atlas of Histology. W.B. Saunder’s Co., Philadelphia, pp. 362-393.
    10. Mukharjee, K.L. (1992). Medical Laboratory Technology. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd., New Delhi, 3: 1157-1171.
    11. Panse, U.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1967). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, New Delhi.
    12. Shahjahan, M.A. et al. (1977). Bangladesh Vet. J., 11: 73-80, (Vet. Bull, 1980) 50: 435.
    13. Singh, U.B. and Sulochana (1997). Handbook of Histological and Histochemical Techniques. Premier Publishing House 5-1-8000, First floor, Kothi, Hyderabad, pp. 1-63.
    Published In
    Indian Journal of Animal Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 41 issue 2 (june 2007) : 151 - 152

      CONNECTIVE TISSUE FIBER ARRANGEMENT OF SKIN IN RED KANDHARI COWS

      M
      M.B. Hole
      N
      N.S. Bhosle
      P
      P.J. Kapadnis
      1College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, MAFSU, Parbhani - 431 402, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- Hole M.B., Bhosle N.S., Kapadnis P.J. (2025). CONNECTIVE TISSUE FIBER ARRANGEMENT OF SKIN IN RED KANDHARI COWS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 41(2): 151 - 152. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      For the present study fifteen female Red Kandhari cattle were used. The skin of the Red
      Kandhari cow consisted of epidermis, dermis and hypodermis. The dermis was enmeshed with
      collagen, elastic and reticular fibers. The collagen fibers were found thick, coarse and irregularly
      distributed in all the three body regions. These fibers were loosely arranged in the papillary
      layer but dense arrangement of large bundles of collagen fibers were commonly observed in the
      reticular layer of the dermis. The collagen fibers were more developed in lactating cow as
      compared to that of non lactating and pregnant Red Kandhari cow.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Amakiri, S.F. (1975). Nigerian Vet. Med. Assoc., 4(1): 21-28.
        2. Bhayni, D.M. and Vyas, K.N. (1991). Indian Vet. J., 68(4): 344-347.
        3. Calhoun, M.L. and Stinson, A.W. (1981). In: Text Book of Veterinary Histology. (Dellmann, H.D. and Brown, E.M.
        4. eds.) K.M. Varghese Company, Bombay, pp. 378-411.
        5. Dellmann, H.D. and Brown, E.M. (1987). Textbook of Veterinary Histology, 3rd Edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp. 382-415.
        6. Dyce, K.M. et al. (1996). Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy, 2nd Edn, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, pp. 349-366.
        7. Fazzini, U. and Peirone, S.M. (1985). Vet. Bull., 55(11): 7484.
        8. Govindaiah, M.G. and Nagaroenkar, R. (1983). Mysore J. Agric. Sci., 17: 371-377.
        9. Leeson, T.S. et al. (1988). Text Atlas of Histology. W.B. Saunder’s Co., Philadelphia, pp. 362-393.
        10. Mukharjee, K.L. (1992). Medical Laboratory Technology. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd., New Delhi, 3: 1157-1171.
        11. Panse, U.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1967). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, New Delhi.
        12. Shahjahan, M.A. et al. (1977). Bangladesh Vet. J., 11: 73-80, (Vet. Bull, 1980) 50: 435.
        13. Singh, U.B. and Sulochana (1997). Handbook of Histological and Histochemical Techniques. Premier Publishing House 5-1-8000, First floor, Kothi, Hyderabad, pp. 1-63.
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Indian Journal of Animal Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)