Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 41 issue 2 (june 2007) : 94 - 100

ASSESSING BUFFALOES COMFORT : EFFECTS OF TWO PROTEIN SOURCES ON PHYSIOLOGICAL REACTIONS AND FEEDING BEHAVIOR OF MALE GROWING BUFFALO CALVES

A.R. Yazdani
1Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Golestan Province, Iran

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Yazdani A.R. (2024). ASSESSING BUFFALOES COMFORT : EFFECTS OF TWO PROTEIN SOURCES ON PHYSIOLOGICAL REACTIONS AND FEEDING BEHAVIOR OF MALE GROWING BUFFALO CALVES. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 41(2): 94 - 100. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The objective of this research work was to assess the male buffalo calves performance
under two different feeding regimes. An experiment were conducted to study the feeding of
different sources of protein, viz., cotton seed meal (CSM) and Soya bean meal (SBM) in the
ration of male buffalo calves in Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources,
Gorgan. 25 male buffalo calves of 6-12 months of age were selected and after 21days of pre
adjustment period on feeding, 5 animals were discarded and the remaining 20 buffalo calves
were divided into 2 groups of 10 calves under each treatment. Observations were recorded on
the animal responses to physiological reactions, and feeding behavior for 120 days. The statistical
analysis was of complete randomized design (CRD). The housing systems for both the groups
were loose housing system. Physiological responses like respiration rate (count per minute) of
SBM group were significantly higher than that of the CSM group (P

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Alim, K.A. and Ahmad, I.A. (1956). Nature, London, 177: 900.
    2. Antil, I.S. (1988). M.Sc.Thesis, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.
    3. A.O.A.C. (1970).Official Methods of Analysis.11th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C.
    4. Askar, A.A. et al. (1952). Indian J. Dairy Sci., 5: 171-182.
    5. Bartocci, S. et al. (2002). Livest. Prod. Sci., 77: 45-58.
    6. Bidarkar, D.K. (1985). Ph.D.Thesis, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.
    7. Cockrill, W.R. (1980). World Anim. Rev., 33: 2-13.
    8. Fahimuddin, M. (1975). In: Domestic Water Buffalo. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, pp. 70.
    9. Findlay, J.D. (1950). Bull. Hannah Dairy Res. Inst. No. 9. (Cited by Mullick, 1960).
    10. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (1979). The Water Buffalo. FAO, Rome, Italy, pp. 282.
    11. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2000).The Husbandry and Health of the Domestic Buffalo. FAO, Rome, Italy.
    12. Fraser, D. (1995). Anim.Welfare, 4: 103-117.
    13. Fregonesi, J.A. and Leaver, J.D. (2001). Livest. Prod.Sci., 68: 205-216.
    14. Goswami, S.B. and Premnarayan (1962). Indian J. Vet. Sci. Anim. Husb., 32: 112-118.
    15. Grewal, S.S. (1980). M.Sc.Thesis, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.
    16. Hafez, E.S.E. et al. (1955). J. Agric. Sci., 46: 19-29.
    17. Johnston, J.E. et al. (1961). J. Dairy Sci., 44: 976.
    18. Mahadevan, P. (1978). World Anim. Rev., 25: 2-7.
    19. Misra, M.S. et al. (1963). Indian J. Dairy Sci., 16: 203.
    20. Mladenov, M. and Tomova, I. (1987). Nutr. Abstr. and Rev., 57: 1553.
    21. NRC (1988). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington.
    22. Pandey, M.D. and Ray, A. (1969). Brit. Vet. J., 125: 463-470.
    23. Radadia, N.S. (1979). Haryana Agric. J. Res., 10: 442-447.
    24. Razdan, M.N. et al. (1968). Indian J. Dairy Sci., 21: 82-91.
    25. Rosati, A. and Van Vleck, L.D. (2002). Livstock Prod. Sci., 74: 185-190.
    26. Sagoz, Y. et al. (2003). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 73(1): 104-106.
    27. Sen, K.C. and Ray, S.N. (1978). Nutritive Values of Indian Cattle Feeds and the Feeding of Animals. ICAR pub.
    28. Sharma, D.D. and Singh, M.P. (1988). Indian J. Anim. Prod. Mgmt., 4: 222-224.
    29. Singh, M.P. (1982). Ph.D Thesis, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.
    30. Soly, M.J. and Singh, S.V. (2003). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 74: 185-190.
    31. Thind, J.S. and Gill, R.S. (1986). Indian J. Dairy Sci., 39: 41-46.
    32. Thomas, C.K. et al. (1978). Indian J. Dairy Sci., 31: 128-134.
    33. Todekar, D.R. and Tomar, O.S. (1986). Indian J. Anim. Prod. Mgmt., 2: 2.
    34. Yadav, B.L. (1981). M.Sc.Thesis, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India.
    35. Yazdani, A.R. and Gupta, L.R. (1996a). In: National Symposium on Livestock Industry for Self / Gainful Employment, held at Department of Livestock Production and Management, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai - 600 007, from Sept. 18 to 20, India.
    36. Yazdani, A.R. and Gupta, L.R. (1996b). In: National Symposium on Livestock Industry for Self / Gainful Employment, held at Department of Livestock Production and Management, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai -600 007, from Sept. 18 to 20, India
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)