Banner

Chief Editor:
M. R. Saseendranath
Kerala Veterinary and Animal Science University, Mannuthy, Thrissur, INDIA
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, ...
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 41 issue 1 (march 2007) : 62 - 64

EFFICACY OF COPPER AS A MICRONUTRIENT FOR THE FINGERLINGS OF HETEROPNEUSTES FOSSILIS (BLOCH)

A.K. Gupta, C. Singh
1Department of Aquaculture, College of Fisheries, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur - 313 001, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Gupta A.K., Singh C. (2025). EFFICACY OF COPPER AS A MICRONUTRIENT FOR THE FINGERLINGS OF HETEROPNEUSTES FOSSILIS (BLOCH). Indian Journal of Animal Research. 41(1): 62 - 64. doi: .
Dietary copper requirement for the fingerlings of Heteropneustes fossilis was evaluated using
isocaloric purified diet, supplemented with graded levels of copper {i.e. 0 (control), 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9
mg/kg}. Significant growth parameters, viz., weight gain, specific growth rate (SGR) and gross
conversion efficiency (GCE) were noted with lowest food conversion ratio (FCR) at a level of 3 mg
Cu/kg diet. Fingerlings fed with Cu-deficient diet showed sign of sluggishness and poor growth with low specific growth rate, gross conversion efficiency and high food conversion ratio. Fingerlings fed with Cu-supplemented diets were found to improve protein, fat and carbohydrate contents. Significant RBC count in fingerlings was recorded at 3 mg Cu/kg diet.
    1. Baker, J.T.P. (1968). J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 26: 2785-2793.
    2. Cho, C. et al. (1976). J. Nutr., 106: 1547-1556.
    3. Collvin, L. (1984). Wat. Res., 18: 139-144.
    4. Collvin, L. (1985). J. Fish BioI., 27: 757-763.
    5. Crandall, C.A. and Goodnight, C.J. (1963). Trans. Am. Microscop. Soc., 82: 59-73.
    6. Gatlin, D.M. III and Wilson, R.P. (1984). Aquacult., 41: 31-36.
    7. Gatlin, D.M. III and Wilson, R.P. (1986). Aquacult., 54: 277-285.
    8. Julshamn, K. et al. (1988). Aquacult., 73: 143-155.
    9. Knox, D. et al. (1982). Aquacult., 27: 111-119.
    10. Knox, D. et al. (1984). Aquacult., 40: 199-207.
    11. Lett, P.F. et al. (1976). J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 33: 1335-1342.
    12. McKim, J.W. et al. (1970). J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 27: 1883-1889.
    13. Murai, T. et al. (1981). Aquacult., 22: 353-357.
    14. Ogino, C. and Yang, G-Y. (1978). Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish, 44: 1015-1018.
    15. Ogino, C. (1979). Lab. Fish Nutr. Tokyo, 11-18.
    16. Ogino, C. and Yang, G-Y. (1980). Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish, 46: 455-458.
    17. Passow, H. et al. (1961). Pharmacal. Rev., 13: 185-224.
    18. Snedecor, G.R.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1967). Statistical Methods, 6th edn., The Iowa State University Press, America, Iowa.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)