Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 41 issue 1 (march 2007) : 35 - 38

IMPACT OF GLYCYRRHIZA GLABRA LINN. AS GROWTH PROMOTER IN THE SUPPLEMENTARY FEED OF AN INDIAN MAJOR CARP CIRRHINUS MRIGALA (HAM.)

Raj Kumar, B.K. Sharma, L.L. Sharma
1Department of Limnology and Fisheries, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur - 313 001, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Kumar Raj, Sharma B.K., Sharma L.L. (2024). IMPACT OF GLYCYRRHIZA GLABRA LINN. AS GROWTH PROMOTER IN THE SUPPLEMENTARY FEED OF AN INDIAN MAJOR CARP CIRRHINUS MRIGALA (HAM.). Indian Journal of Animal Research. 41(1): 35 - 38. doi: .

ABSTRACT

In this experiment, the roots of a herb mulethi (Glycyrrhiza glabra Linn.) were mixed with the
supplementary diet (groundnut oil cake and rice bran in 1:1) of fish at three different levels and fed to the fingerlings of an Indian major carp Cirrhinus mrigala (Ham.) in the glass aquaria. Mulethi was mixed with the conventional diet @ 0.1% (T1), 0.2% (T2) and 0.3% (T3) and control diet was kept without mulethi. Experimental diets including control were fed @ 2 per cent body wt. of fish per day for 60 days. The fingerlings fed with diet T3 (containing mulethi @ 0.3%) gave the highest
growth (weight gain) of 24% where as fingerlings fed with diet T1, T2 and C (control) diets showed the weight gain of 18.52%, 20.37% and 12.77%, respectively. Analysis of variance indicated that the growth per day in per cent body weight, average wt. gain, food conversion ratio (FCR), gross conversion efficiency (GCE) and specific growth rate (SGR) were significantly higher (P

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. APHA (1989). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste water 12th ed. American Public Health Assoc. Washington, DC.
    2. Ashwani Kumar (2000). M.Sc. Thesis, Agriculture University, Udaipur.
    3. Benerjee, S.M. (1967). Indian J. Fish., 14(1 and 2): 115-144.
    4. Jhingran, V.G. (1983). Fish and Fisheries of India. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, Delhi, 666.
    5. Kavitha, K. (1996). M.Sc. Thesis, RAU, Bikaner.
    6. Kumar, S. (2000). M.Sc. Thesis, Rajasthan Agriculture University, Bikaner.
    7. Prinsloo, J.F. and Schoonbee, H.J. (1984). Observation on fish growth in polyculture during summer and autumn in
    8. fish ponds at the Umtater Dam. Fish Research Centre, Transkei, Part 1 : The use of pig manure with and
    9. without pelleted fish feed. Water S.A. 10(1): 15-23.
    10. Smitherman, R.O. and Boyd, C.E. (1974). In: Water Resources Utilization and Conservation in the Environment. (Blount, M.C. ed.), Fort. Valley State College, Fort Valley, Georgia, 152-166.
    11. Swingle, H.S. (1957). In: IX Proc. Sci. Congr., Bangkok, Thiland.
    12. Swingle, H.S. (1967). FAO Fish Rep., 44(4): 397-421.
    13. Trivedi, R.K. and Goel, P.K. (1986). Chemical and Biological Methods for Water Pollution Studies. Env. Publ.
    14. Karad, India.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)