Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 42 issue 4 (december 2008) : 248-252

GENETIC AND NON-GENETIC FACTORS AFFECTING THE CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS OF JAPANESE QUAILS* (COTURNIX COTURNIX JAPONICA)

B. Punya Kumari1, B. Ramesh Gupta, A. Rajasekhar Reddy2, M. Gnana Prakash, K. Sudhakar Reddy3
1Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Veterinary Science, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Kumari1 Punya B., Gupta Ramesh B., Reddy2 Rajasekhar A., Prakash Gnana M., Reddy3 Sudhakar K. (2024). GENETIC AND NON-GENETIC FACTORS AFFECTING THE CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS OF JAPANESE QUAILS* (COTURNIX COTURNIX JAPONICA). Indian Journal of Animal Research. 42(4): 248-252. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Data on 164 Japanese quails were utilized to study the effect of strains, hatches and sex of
chicks on pre-slaughter weight and weights of carcass after bleeding, dressed carcass, eviscerated
carcass, inedible and edible offals and various carcass cuts. The Black strain was superior to Brown
for all the characters except the breast weight. Significant hatch effect was observed for the preslaughter
weight, dressed weight, eviscerated carcass, inedible offals, heart and gizzard. The
sexual dimorphism was not evident for any of the characters studied, except pre-slaughter weight.
Majority of the carcass traits were medium to highly heritable.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Becker, W.A. (1985). Manual of Quantitative Genetics, Program in Genetics, Washington State University.
    2. Brah, G.S. et al. (1998). Indian J. Poultry Sci., 33:303-308.
    3. Damme, K and Aumann, J. (1992). Proc. 19th World Poultry Congress, 3:371-374.
    4. Dhaliwal, S.K. et al. (2004). Indian J. Poultry Sci., 39:112-119.
    5. El Full, E.A. (2000). Egyptian J. Poultry Sci., 20:649-661.
    6. Harvey, W.R. (1979). Least-square Analysis of Data with Unequal Sub-class Numbers. ARS, USDA, Washington, DC.
    7. Kawahara, T. and Saito, K. (1976). Poultry Sci., 55:1247-1252.
    8. Kirmizibayrak, T. and Altinel, A. (2001). British Poultry Sci., 41:41-45.
    9. Kramer, C.Y. (1957). Biometrics, 13:13-18.
    10. Table 2. Estimates of heritabilities of carcass characteristics of Black and Brown Japanese quails
    11. Black Brown
    12. Males Females Males Females
    13. h2 SE h2 SE h2 SE h2 SE
    14. Pre-slaughter weight @ - -0.09 - 0.35 0.07 -0.07 -
    15. Dressed carcass weight 0.86 0.10 $ - $ - @ -
    16. Total Inedible offals : 0.58 0.10 0.86 0.11 0.78 0.08 0.05 0.11
    17. Head 0.26 0.09 0.84 0.11 0.71 0.08 $ -
    18. Skin with feathers 0.79 0.10 0.47 0.10 0.34 0.07 0.15 0.12
    19. Feet 0.55 0.10 $ - 0.99 0.09 $ -
    20. Total Giblets : @ - $ - @ - $ -
    21. Heart 0.72 0.10 0.05 0.09 $ - 0.01 0.11
    22. Liver 0.36 0.09 0.88 0.11 $ - $ -
    23. Gizzard @ - $ - $ - $ -
    24. Carcass cuts :
    25. Wings 0.33 0.09 $ - $ - $ -
    26. Neck $ - 0.31 0.09 $ - $ -
    27. Legs 0.44 0.09 0.49 0.10 $ - $ -
    28. Thighs 0.51 0.09 0.44 0.10 $ - $ -
    29. Drumsticks 0.24 0.09 0.44 0.10 $ - $ -
    30. Breast $ - 0.39 0.10 $ - $ -
    31. Back $ - @ - $ - $ -
    32. @ More than unity
    33. $ Not estimable due to negative component of sire variance
    34. 252 INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH
    35. Mandal, K.G. et al. (1993). Indian J. Poultry Sci., 28:262-264.
    36. Minvielle, F. et al. (2000). British Poultry Sci., 41:41-45.
    37. Oguz, I. et al. (1996). British Poultry Sci., 37:579-588.
    38. Oguz, I. et al. (1999). J. Appl. Animal Res., 15:175-180.
    39. Prado-Gonzalez, E.A. et al. (2003). Livestock Res. Rural Dev., 15:1-7.
    40. Sreenivasulu, R. (1997). M.V.Sc. Thesis., Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad.
    41. Toelle, V.D. et al. (1991). Poultry Sci. 70:1679-1688.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)