Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 42 issue 2 (june 2008) : 128-130

GENETIC ANALYSIS OF GROWTH RATE IN A SYNTHETIC BROILER STRAIN

Vikram Singh, L.S. Jain
1Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur - 313 001, Rajasthan, India.
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Singh Vikram, Jain L.S. (2024). GENETIC ANALYSIS OF GROWTH RATE IN A SYNTHETIC BROILER STRAIN. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 42(2): 128-130. doi: .
615 Chicks were taken in the three hatches being the progeny of 96 females and 16 males. The
average per day body weight gain between 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, 6-8 and 0-8 weeks of age were 7.46±0.09,
14.89±0.14, 43.44±0.28, 61.40±0.32 and 31.83±0.08g, respectively. The effect of hatch was found
to be highly significant on growth traits except 4-6 week growth rate. The growth rate was significantly
higher in males than females. The heritability estimates were low (0.136±0.085) for 6-8 week
growth rate, moderate (0.237±0.117) and 0.385±0.160 for 0-8 week growth rate and 4-6 week
growth rate and higher at 0.401±0.165 and 0.695±0.239 for 0-2 week and 2-4 week growth rate
respectively. The genetic association of 0-2 week and 2-4 week with 6-8 week and 0-8 week were
positive and moderate. The phenotypic association of growth rate between 0-2, 2-4, 4-6 and 6-8
week had positive and significant with growth rate of 0-8 weeks of age. Most of the environmental
correlations among growth traits were low either positive or negative.
    1. Bhushan, B. et al. (1998). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 68: 1202-1204.
    2. Harvey, W.R. (1990). Mixed Model Least Square and Maximum likelihood computer programme user’s guide for LS ML MW and MIX MDL PC-2 version.
    3. Khan, A.G. et al. (1994). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 64: 1383-84.
    4. Parmar, S.N.S. et al. (2000). Indian Vet. Med. J., 24: 279-280.
    5. Robertson, A (1959). Biometrics, 15: 469-485.
    6. Snedecor, G.W and Cochran, W.G. (1968). Statistical Methods. 6th Ed. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi.
    7. Swiger, R.A. et al. (1964). Biometrics, 20: 818-826.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)