Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.43

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.5 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 47 issue 5 (october 2013) : 439-442


Chandan Kumar, M.L. Kamboj, A. Shyam Singh
1Division of Livestock Production Management National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal -132001, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Kumar Chandan, Kamboj M.L., Singh Shyam A. (2023). EFFECT OF FENCELINE FEEDING ON THE BEHAVIOUR AND PERFORMANCE OF LACTATING CROSSBRED COWS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 47(5): 439-442. doi: .
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of type of manger on the performance and behaviour of lactating crossbred cows. For this 18 crossbred (Karan-Fries) cows from their 1-3 parity were selected and divided randomly into three groups (control, treatment 1 and treatment 2) as per  their milk yield, body weight having six cows in each group. In control group cows were fed in the elevated manger i.e. 50 cm, above from the ground level, in treatment 1 cows were fed through fenceline consisting of post and rail without partition and in treatment 2 cows were fed though fenceline consisting of post and rail with partitions. Behaviour measured in terms of % aggressive index (AI) and % displacement index (DI) was found to be significantly higher (P
  1. Albright,J.L.,(1981) Behaviour and management of high yielding dairy cows. Dairy Sci. Handbook 14:343
  2. Batchelder, T. L., (2000) The impact of head gates and overcrowding on production and behavioural patterns of lactating dairy cows. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Dairy Housing and Equipment Systems: Managing and planning for profitability. NRAES - 129, Ithaca, Pages 325-330
  3. Beilharz,R.G and Zeeb,K.(1982) Social dominance in dairy cattle. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 8 ,79–97
  4. Bouissou, M. F., (1980) Social relationships in domestic cattle under modern management techniques. Bulletin of Zoology, 47,343–353
  5. DeVries,T.J and Keyserlingk, M.A.G.Von (2005) Time of feed delivery affects the feeding and lying patterns of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 88,625-631
  6. Gibbons, J.M.; Lawrence, A.B and Haskell, M.J (2009) Consistency of aggressive feeding behaviour in dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. (2009), doi:10.1016/J.applanim.2009.08.002
  7. Huzzey, J. M.; De Vries, T. J.; Valois, P and Keyserlingk, M.A.G. Von (2006) Stocking density and feed barrier design affect the feeding and social behaviour of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 89,126–133
  8. Manson, F.J and Appleby, M.C (1990) Spacing of dairy cows at a feed trough. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 26, 69–81
  9. Barroso, F.G.; Alados, C.L.; Boaz, J. (2000) Social hierarchy in the domestic goat: effects on food habit and production. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 69, 35-53
  10. Arave, C.W.; Bolinger,D.; Shipka,M.P and Albright,J.L (1996). Effect of extended lockup of lactating cows on milk production, feed intake and behaviour, J. Animal Sci. 74 (SuppI.1) 43
  11. DeVries, T.J.; Keyserlingk, M.A.G.Von.;Weary,D.M and Beauchemin, K.A.(2003) Measuring the feeding behaviour of lactating dairy cows in early to peak lactation. J.Dairy Sci. 86:3354-3361.

Editorial Board

View all (0)